Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

The emotional counting Stroop: a task for assessing emotional interference during brain imaging

Abstract

The emotional counting Stroop (ecStroop) is an emotional variant of the counting Stroop. Both of these tasks require a motor response instead of a spoken response for the purpose of minimizing head movement during functional MRI (fMRI). During this task, subjects report, by button press, the number of words (1–4) that appear on a screen, regardless of word meaning. Neutral word-control trials contain common words (e.g., 'cabinet' written three times), while interference trials contain emotional words (e.g., 'murder' written three times). The degree to which this task represents a true 'Stroop' interference task, in the sense that emotional words will increase motor-response times compared with neutral words, depends upon the subjects of the study and the words that are presented. Much research on the emotional Stroop task demonstrates that interference effects are observed in psychopathological groups in response to words that are specific to their disorder, and in normal subjects when the words are related to current concerns endorsed by them. The ecStroop task described here will produce reaction time-interference effects that are comparable to the traditional color-naming emotional Stroop. This protocol can be completed in 20 min per subject. The protocol described here employs neutral words and emotional words that include general-negative words, as well as words specific to combat-related trauma. However, this protocol is amenable to any emotional word lists.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Examples of single trials for the three types of stimulus.
Figure 2: Words used in a study of combat veterans with and without PTSD7.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stroop, J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Exp. Psychol. 18, 643–662 (1935).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mathews, A.M. & MacLeod, C. Cognitive approaches to emotion and emotional disorders. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 45, 25–50 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McNally, R.J. et al. Selective processing of threat cues in posttraumatic stress disorder. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 99, 398–402 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Whalen, P.J. et al. The emotional counting Stroop paradigm: a functional magnetic resonance imaging probe of the anterior cingulate affective division. Biol. Psychiatry 44, 1219–1228 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bush, G., Luu, P. & Posner, M.I. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 215–222 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams, J.M.G., Mathews, A. & MacLeod, C. The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychol. Bull. 120, 3–24 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Donaldson, D.I. & Buckner, R.L. in Functional MRI: An Introduction to Methods (eds. Jezzard, P., Mathews, P.M. & Smith, S.M.) 177–195 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ollinger, J.M., Corbetta, M. & Shulman, G.L. Separating processes within a trial in event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 13, 210–217 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaspi, S.P., McNally, R.J. & Amir, H. Cognitive processing of emotional information in posttraumatic stress disorder. Cognit. Ther. Res. 19, 319–330 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zarahn, E., Agguire, G. & D'Esposito, M. A trial-based experimental design for fMRI. Neuroimage 6, 122–138 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Oldfield, R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsycholgia 9, 97–113 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shin, L.M. et al. An fMRI study of anterior cingulate function in posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 50, 932–942 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chemtob, C.M. et al. The Honolulu posttraumatic stress disorder stimulus set. J. Trauma. Stress 10, 337–343 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McNally, R.J. et al. Sensitivity to stress-relevant stimuli in posttraumatic stress disorder. J. Anxiety Disord. 1, 105–116 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Devinsky, O., Morrell, M.J. & Vogt, B.A. Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. Brain 118, 279–306 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vogt, B.A., Finch, D.M. & Olson, C.R. Functional heterogeneity in cingulate cortex: the anterior executive and posterior evaluative regions [review]. Cereb. Cortex 2, 435–443 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bush, G. et al. The counting Stroop: an interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging — validation study with functional MRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 6, 270–282 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by NIMH (16259 and 01215) and NARSAD. Preparation of this manuscript was supported by NIMH (069315).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul J Whalen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whalen, P., Bush, G., Shin, L. et al. The emotional counting Stroop: a task for assessing emotional interference during brain imaging. Nat Protoc 1, 293–296 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.45

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.45

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing