Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Bottlenose dolphins perceive object features through echolocation

Abstract

How organisms (including people) recognize distant objects is a fundamental question1. The correspondence between object characteristics (distal stimuli), like visual shape, and sensory characteristics (proximal stimuli), like retinal projection, is ambiguous. The view that sensory systems are ‘designed’ to ‘pick up’ ecologically useful information is vague about how such mechanisms might work2. In echolocating dolphins, which are studied as models for object recognition sonar systems, the correspondence between echo characteristics and object characteristics is less clear3. Many cognitive scientists assume that object characteristics are extracted from proximal stimuli, but evidence for this remains ambiguous. For example, a dolphin may store ‘sound templates’ in its brain and identify whole objects by listening for a particular sound. Alternatively, a dolphin's brain may contain algorithms, derived through natural endowments or experience or both, which allow it to identify object characteristics based on sounds. The standard method used to address this question in many species4,5,6,7 is indirect and has led to equivocal results with dolphins8,9,10. Here we outline an appropriate method and test it to show that dolphins extract object characteristics directly from echoes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Examples of stimulus objects.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldstein, E. B. (ed.) Blackwell Handbook of Perception (Blackwell, Oxford, 2001)

  2. Gibson, J. J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Au, W. W. L. The Sonar of Dolphins (Springer, New York, 1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Garbin, C. P. Visual-haptic perceptual nonequivalence of shape information and its impact upon cross-modal performance. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 14, 547–553 (1988)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Davenport, R. K. in Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech (eds Harnad, S. R., Steklis, H. D. & Lancaster, J.). Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 280, 143–149 (1976).

  6. Gunderson, V. M., Rose, S. A. & Grant-Webster, K. S. Cross-modal transfer in high- and low-risk infant pigtailed macaque monkeys. Dev. Psychol. 26, 576–581 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weiskrantz, L. & Cowey, A. Cross-modal matching in the rhesus monkey using a single pair of stimuli. Neuropsychology 13, 257–261 (1975)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harley, H. E., Roitblat, H. L. & Nachtigall, P. E. Object representation in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): Integration of visual and echoic information. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 22, 164–174 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pack, A. A. & Herman, L. M. Sensory integration in the bottlenosed dolphin: Immediate recognition of complex shapes across the senses of echolocation and vision. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 722–733 (1995)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Herman, L. M., Pack, A. A. & Hoffman-Kuhnt, M. Seeing through sound: Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) perceive the spatial structure of objects through echolocation. J. Comp. Psychol. 112, 292–305 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Evans, W. E. Echolocation by marine delphinids and one species of fresh-water dolphin. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54, 191–199 (1973)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Au, W. W. L., Schusterman, R. J. & Kersting, D. A. in Animal Sonar Systems (eds Busnel, R. G. & Fish, J. F.) 859–862 (Plenum Press, New York, 1980)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Nachtigall, P. E., Murchison, A. E. & Au, W. W. L. in Animal Sonar Systems (eds Busnel, R. G. & Fish, J. F.) 945–947 (Plenum Press, New York, 1980)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Roitblat, H. L., Penner, R. H. & Nachtigall, P. E. Matching-to-sample by an echolocating dolphin. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 16, 85–95 (1990)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Xitco, M. J. Jr & Roitblat, H. L. Object recognition through eavesdropping: Passive echolocation in bottlenose dolphins. Anim. Learn. Behav. 24, 355–365 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Au, W. W. L. & Pawloski, D. A. Cylinder wall thickness discrimination by an echolocating dolphin. J. Comp. Physiol. A 172, 41–47 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Walt Disney Company's Animal Programs, New College of Florida and the University of South Florida. All experimental procedures were evaluated and approved according to animal welfare regulations specified under National Institutes of Health guidelines. We thank: G. Bauer, J. Gory, A. Stamper, W. Fellner and J. Orth for discussion and manuscript review; D. Clark, D. Bickel, W. Fellner and K. Yannessa for research session and data management; J. Davis, A. Stamper, T. Hopkins, B. Stevens, J. Ogden and J. Mellen for administrative support; and M. Muraco, M. Barringer, B. Cavanaugh, L. Davis, D. Feuerbach, C. Goonen, L. Larsen-Plott, K. Odell and C. Litz for training the dolphin.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heidi E. Harley.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

41586_2003_BFnature01846_MOESM1_ESM.jpg

Supplementary Figure SI1: Figures SI1 – SI6. Fifty-four “junk” objects were presented in six groups that each contained three 3-object problems. In Groups 1, 3, and 5, the sample was presented echoically and the alternatives, visually. In Groups 2, 4, and 6, the sample was presented visually and the alternatives, echoically. Boxed objects were arbitrarily paired. (JPG 49 kb)

Supplementary Figure SI2 (JPG 42 kb)

Supplementary Figure SI3 (JPG 40 kb)

Supplementary Figure SI4 (JPG 43 kb)

Supplementary Figure SI5 (JPG 44 kb)

Supplementary Figure SI6 (JPG 45 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harley, H., Putman, E. & Roitblat, H. Bottlenose dolphins perceive object features through echolocation. Nature 424, 667–669 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01846

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01846

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing