Abstract
Purpose To clinically evaluate the random dot stereoacuity cards developed by Birch and Salomao on a population of infants within the first 12 months of life and to generate baseline normative data.
Methods Random dot stereoacuity cards were constructed using vectographic vertical bar stimuli with cross disparities ranging from 45 to 1735 seconds of arc (1.65 to 3.2 log seconds of arc). Wearing polarising goggles, infants were assessed using a two-alternative forced choice preferential looking staircase procedure. Success rate and stereoacuity values for performance as a function of age were evaluated.
Results One hundred and seventy-seven tests were completed on 41 infants with ages ranging from 5 to 56 weeks. The random dot stereoacuity procedure was successful in 128 (72.3%) infants, success being dependent upon age. At 0-8 weeks of age, none of the infants produced a fixation preferance towards even the coarsest stereogram. The success rate increased to 50% at 9-16 weeks, 97% at 17-24 weeks, 93% at 25-36 weeks, dropping to 69% at 37-56 weeks due to increasing intolerance to the goggles. Stereopsis was not demonstrable in infants under 8 weeks of age. By 9-16 weeks the mean stereoacuity level was 2.91 log seconds of arc, further increasing to 2.53 at 17-24 weeks, reducing slightly to 2.65 at 25-36 weeks. At 37-56 weeks the mean stereoacuity value was recorded as 2.53 log seconds of arc.
Conclusion Our results indicate that the infant random dot stereoacuity cards provide a simple, quick and portable test for the clinical assessment of stereopsis in infants aged between 17 and 36 weeks, and should prove to be a useful clinical tool to monitor infants at risk of binocular vision disorders.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Teller DY, McDonald MA, Preston K, Sebris SL, Dobson V . Assessment of visual acuity in infants and children: the acuity card procedure. Dev Med Child Neurol 1986;28:779–89.
Tyler CW, Apkarian P, Levi DM, Nakayama K . Rapid assessment of visual function: an electronic sweep technique for the pattern visual evoked potential. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1979;18:703–13.
Wright KW, Edelman PM, McVey JH, Terry AP, Lin M . High grade stereoacuity after early surgery for congenital esotropia. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:913–9.
Birch EE, Swanson WH, Stager DR, Woody M, Everett M . Outcome after very early treatment of dense congenital unilateral cataract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:3687–99.
Lloyd IC, Dowler JG, Kriss A, Speedwell L, Thompson DA, Russell-Eggitt I, Taylor D . Modulation of amblyopia therapy following early surgery for unilateral congenital cataracts. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:802–6.
Julesz B . Binocular depth perception of computer generated patterns. Bell Syst Tech J 1960;39:1125.
Simons K . Stereoacuity norms in young children. Arch Ophthalmol 1981;99:439–45.
Birch EE, Gwiazda J, Held R . Stereoacuity development for crossed and uncrossed disparities in human infants. Vision Res 1982;22:507–13.
Atkinson J, Braddick O . Stereoscopic discrimination in infants. Perception 1976;5:29–38.
Archer S, Helveston E, Miller K, Ellis F . Stereopsis in normal infants and infants with congenital esotropia. Am J Ophthalmol 1986;101:591–6.
Birch EE, Salomao S . Random dot stereoacuity cards. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1998;35:86–90.
Birch EE, Hale LA . Operant assessment of stereoacuity. Clin Vision Sci 1989;4:295–300.
Gwiazda J . Binocular functions in human infants: correlation of stereoptic and fusion rivalry discrimination. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1989;26:128–33.
Held R, et al. Stereoacuity in human infants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1980;77:5572.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Presented in part at the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, 10-15 May 1998
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Calloway, S., Lloyd, I. & Henson, D. A clinical evaluation of random dot stereoacuity cards in infants. Eye 15, 629–634 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2001.198
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2001.198