Abstract
Background/Purpose The new Biovision B-Scan Probe has greater resolution than its predecessors because of its posteriorly placed focus (25 mm inside the eye) and the consequent reduction in size of the sound field. We investigated the accuracy, reproducibility and test-retest variability of two-dimensional optic cup measurements using this new-generation B-scanner.
Methods One randomly selected eye of 20 patients underwent five repeated measurements of vertical (VOCD) and horizontal optic cup diameters (HOCD), and optic cup depth, using confocal scanning laser tomography (Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph) and high-resolution ultrasound (Biovision, Chiron Vision, UK) on two separate occasions. There was one operator per instrument who was masked to all clinical data and previous measurements. Accuracy of ultrasound readings was quantified by comparing the results with those of Heidelberg Retinal Tomography (HRT).
Results The 95% confidence interval for the bias of echographic vertical and horizontal cup diameter measurements was -95 ± 48 µm and -19 ± 72 µm respectively, and -87 ± 328 µm for cup depth readings. The indices of reproducibility (mean coefficient of repeatability ± SD) were: VOCD: 177 ± 105 µm [B-scan], 209 ± 100 µm [HRT]; HOCD: 179 ± 61 µm [B-scan], 205 ± 101 µm [HRT]; cup depth: 206 ± 63 µm [B-scan], 204 ± 124 µm [HRT]. Ninety-five per cent limits of agreements between initial and retest values for ultrasound were 18 ± 136 µm [VOCD], 2 ± 144 µm [HOCD] and 4 ± 156 µm [cup depth], compared with 1 ± 104 µm [VOCD], 20 ± 102 µm [HOCD] and 3 ± 168 µm [cup depth] for scanning laser tomography.
Conclusion The results demonstrate that measurements of optic cup diameter and depth using ultrasound correlate strongly with corresponding HRT readings. These echographic measurements are reproducible, and not subject to clinically meaningful test-retest variability. This technique of measuring two-dimensional cup parameters does not require expensive specialist equipment and has many potential clinical applications which are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Rohrschneider K, Burk RO, Kruse F, Volcker HE . Reproducibility of the optic nerve head topography with a new laser tomographic scanning device. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1044–9.
Weinreb RN, Dreher AW . Reproducibility and accuracy of topographic measurements of the optic nerve head with the laser tomographic scanner. In: Nasemann JE, Burke ROW, editors. Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and tomography. Munich: Quntessenz, 1990.
Dreher AW, Weinreb RN . Accuracy of topographic measurements in a model eye with the laser tomographic scanner. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:2992–6.
Bland M . An introduction to medical statistics, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Read R, Spaeth GL . Practical clinical appraisal of the optic disc in glaucoma: the natural history of glaucomatous cupping. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1974;78:255.
Scimeca HA . Optic disc changes in glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1979;19:127–54.
Armaly MF . Cup/disc ratio in early open angle glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 1969;26:526.
Schwartz B . Cupping and pallor of the optic disc. Arch Ophthalmol 1973;89:272.
Spencer AF, Vernon SA . Optic disc height measurements with the Zeiss 4-mirror contact lens and 78 dioptre lens compared. Eye 1996;10:371–6.
Littman H . The determination of the true size of objects in the background of the living eye. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1982;180:286–9.
Lichter PR . Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1976;74:524–32.
Balazi AG, Drance SM, Schulzer M, Douglas GR . Neuroretinal rim area in suspected glaucoma and early chronic open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:1011–4.
Bengtsson B . The variation and covariation of cup and disc diameters. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1976;54:804–18.
Takamoto T, Schwartz B . Reproducibility of photogrammetric optic disc cup measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985;26:814–7.
Hee MR, Izatt JA, Swanson EA, Huang D, Schuman JS, Lin CP, et at. Optical coherence tomography of the human retina. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:325–32.
Chauhan BC, Le Blanc RP, McCormick TA, Rogers JB . Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects. Am J Ophthalmol 1994;118:9–15.
Brigatti L, Weitzman M, Caprioli J . Regional test-retest variability of confocal scanning laser tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;120:433–40.
Janknecht P, Funk J . Optic nerve head analyser and Heidelberg retina tomograph: accuracy and reproducibility of topographic measurements in a model eye and in a volunteer. Br J Ophthalmol 1994;78:760–8.
Brigatti L, Caprioli J . Correlation of visual field with scanning confocal laser optic disc measurements in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:1191–4.
Cohen JS, Stone RD, Hetherington J, Bullock J . Glaucomatous optic cupping of the optic disc by ultrasonography. Am J Ophthalmol 1976;82:24–6.
Darnley-Fisch DA, Frazier Byrne S, Hughes JR, Parrish RKII, Feuer WJ . Contact B-scan echography in the assessment of optic nerve cupping. Am J Ophthalmol 1990;109:55–61.
Winder S, Atta HR . Ultrasonography of the optic disc cup in discs of various sizes. Eye 1996;10:732–6.
Funk J, Bornscheuer C, Grehn F . Neuroretinal rim area and visual field in glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1988;226:431–4.
Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GO . Optic disk morphometry in chronic primary open-angle glaucoma. II. Correlation of the intrapapillary morphometric data to visual field indices. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1988;226:531–8.
Aireksinen PJ, Tuulonen A, Alanko HI . Rate and pattern of neuroretinal rim area decrease in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:20610.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in any of the instruments described in the article
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beatty, S., Good, P., McLaughlin, J. et al. Evaluation of optic disc cupping using high-resolution ocular ultrasound. Eye 12, 54–60 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1998.10
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1998.10