Abstract
Purpose: Pre-operative keratometry was performed on 32 eyes of 32 patients undergoing extracapsular cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation, for calculation of intraocular lens power. In an additional 20 eyes of 20 patients post-operative keratometry was performed to guide selective suture removal. Readings from a manual keratometer and an automated handheld keratometer were compared.
Methods: Pre-operative measurements were repeated three times on each subject to assess the repeatability of each machine. Mean-difference plots were performed to define the limits of agreement of the two machines.
Results: Repeatability was higher using manual keratometry (MK) than automated keratometry (AK). There was broad agreement between the two machines in pre-operative and post-operative assessment, although clinically significant differences are likely to occur in some cases.
Conclusions: MK should continue to be used for routine pre-operative keratometry, with the AK providing a useful alternative when MK is not possible. AK is sufficiently accurate to allow its use in post-operative assessment of suture-induced astigmatism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Sanders DR, Retzlaff J, Kraff MC . Comparison of the SRK II formula and other second generation formulae. J Cataract Refract Surg 1988;14:136–41.
Misson GP . Keratometry and post-operative astigmatism. Eye 1992;6:63–5.
Sunderraj P . Clinical comparison of automated and manual keratometry in pre-operative ocular biometry. Eye 1992;6:60–2.
Bland JM, Altman DG . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10.
Harvey EM, Miller JM, Dobson V . Reproducibility of corneal astigmatism measurements with a handheld keratometer in pre-school children. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:983–90.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leyland, M., Benjamin, L. Clinical assessment of a hand-held automated keratometer in cataract surgery. Eye 11, 854–857 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1997.219
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1997.219