Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Short Communication
  • Published:

Comparison of nutrient intakes from two selected diet plans considered healthful versus the cutoff points for green lights as defined by the UK’s multiple traffic light scheme

Abstract

This study compared nutrient intakes from 7-day menus for the US MyPlate and DASH Eating Plan versus the cutoff points for green lights defined by the UK’s multiple traffic light (MTL) scheme. For both diets, the foods achieved green lights for saturated fat and salt, and for beverages for total fat, saturated fat and salt. The other nutrients achieved amber lights but were within the range of the two diets. By contrast, the MTL threshold for salt in beverages was outside the range of the diets. The values for salt in beverages in the MyPlate and Dash diet plans were 0.06±0.07 and 0.19±0.01 (s.d.) g/100 ml, which are both considerably lower compared with the cutoff of 0.3 g/100 ml for an MTL green light. Adjusting the green MTL threshold values to the median values for a healthful diet could help make MTL labelling a more valid way of helping consumers choose a healthful diet.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014 2014, Available at http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/148114/1/9789241564854_eng.pdf?ua=1 (accessed on 12 February 2015).

  2. UK Government. Guide to creating a front of pack (FoP) nutrition label for pre-packed products sold through retail outlets 2013, Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/300886/2902158_FoP_Nutrition_2014.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2015).

  3. Townsend MS . Where is the science? What will it take to show that nutrient profiling systems work? Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 91: 1109S–1115S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Scarborough P, Boxer A, Rayner M, Stockley L . Testing nutrient profile models using data from a survey of nutrition professionals. Public Health Nutr 2007; 10: 337–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. US Department of Agriculture. Sample Menus for a 2000 Calorie Food Pattern. Available at http://www.choosemyplate.gov/food-groups/downloads/Sample_Menus-2000Cals-DG2010.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2015).

  6. NHLBI, NIH. Your Guide to Lowering Your Blood Pressure with DASH—A Week with the DASH Eating Plan 2015, Available at http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/resources/heart/hbp-dash-week-dash-html (accessed on 12 February 2015).

  7. US Department of Agriculture. National Nutrient Database for Standard References (Release 27) 2015, Available at http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/search/list (accessed on 15 May 2015).

  8. Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003, (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 916).

  9. US Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Scientific Report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. Available at http://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015-scientific-report/ (accessed on 15 May 2015).

  10. Ledikwe JH, Blanck HM, Kettel Khan L, Serdula MK, Seymour JD, Tohill BC et al. Dietary energy density is associated with energy intake and weight status in US adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 83: 1362–1368.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H Green.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors are, or have been, employed by Nestlé SA, Vevey, Switzerland.

Additional information

Author contributions

HG conceived and carried out the study, performed data analysis and drafted the manuscript. EF carried out the study, performed data analysis and helped draft the manuscript. Both authors approved the final version of the article including authorship.

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on European Journal of Clinical Nutrition website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Green, H., Fern, E. Comparison of nutrient intakes from two selected diet plans considered healthful versus the cutoff points for green lights as defined by the UK’s multiple traffic light scheme. Eur J Clin Nutr 70, 277–279 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2015.125

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2015.125

Search

Quick links