Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Inverted BMI rather than BMI is a better predictor of DEXA determined body fatness in children

Abstract

This study compared body mass index (BMI) and inverted BMI (iBMI) as predictors of body fatness in 177 Portuguese children (149 girls and 96 boys) aged 7–16 years. Participants undertook measures of height and body mass from which BMI (kg/m2) and iBMI (cm2/kg) were determined. Maturation was determined via self-report and fat mass index (FMI, kg/m2) via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Significant relationships were evident between BMI and iBMI and FMI (both P=0.0001). BMI was not normally distributed (P=0.0001) but iBMI was (P>0.05). Analysis of covariance identified that BMI and iBMI, controlling for maturation, were both significant predictors of FMI (both P=0.0001) but that iBMI predicted a slightly greater amount of the variance (adjusted R2=0.970) compared with BMI (adjusted R2=0.968). This study suggests that iBMI is a similar proxy for body fatness compared with BMI in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

References

  1. Nevill AM, Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou A, Metsios GS, Koutedakis Y, Holder RL, Kitas GD et al. Inverted BMI rather than BMI is a better proxy for percentage body fat. Ann Hum Biol 2011; 36: 681–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nevill AM, Metsios GS, Jackson AS, Wang J, Thornton J, Gallagher D . Can we use the Jackson and Pollock equations to predict body density/fat of obese individuals in the 21st century? Int J Body Comp Res 2008; 6: 115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH . Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 2000; 320: 1240–1243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Abbott RA, Ball EJ, O’Connor J, Steinbeck KS, Wishart C, Gaskin KJ et al. The use of body mass index to predict body composition in children. Ann Hum Biol 2002; 29: 619–626.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rothman KJ . BMI-related errors in the measurement of obesity. Int J Obes 2008; 32 (Suppl 3), S56–S59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jackson AS, Stanforth PR, Gagnon J, Rankinen T, Leon AS, Rao DC et al. The effect of sex, age and race on estimating percentage body fat from body mass index: the Heritage Family Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Dis 2002; 26: 789–796.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dinsdale H, Ridler C, Ells L . A Simple Guide to Classifying Body Mass Index in Children. National Obesity Observatory: Oxford, UK, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duncan MJ, Nevill A, Woodfield L, Al-Nakeeb Y . The relationship between pedometer-determined physical activity, body mass index and lean body mass index in children. Int J Pediatr Obes 2010; 5: 445–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nevill AM, Holder RL . Body mass index: a measure of fatness or leanness? Br J Nutr 1995; 73: 507–516.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Murphy MH, Donnelly P, Shibli S, Foster C, Nevill AM . Physical activity, walking and leanness: an analysis of the Northern Ireland Sport and Physical Activity Survey (SAPAS). Prev Med 2012; 54: 140–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Duncan MJ, James L, Griffiths L . The relationship between resting blood pressure, body mass index and lean body mass index in British children. Ann Hum Biol 2011; 38: 324–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Duncan MJ, Mota J, Vale S, Santos MP, Ribeiro JC . Comparisons between inverted body mass index and body mass index as proxies for body fatness and risk factors for metabolic risk and cardiorespiratory fitness in Portuguese adolescents. Am J Hum Biol 2012; 24: 618–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. VanItallie TB, Yang MU, Heymsfield SB, Funk RC, Boileau RA . Height-normalized indices of the body's fat-free mass and fat mass: potentially useful indicators of nutritional status. Am J Clin Nutr 1990; 52: 953–959.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanner JM . Growth at Adolescence. Blackwell Scientific: Oxford, UK, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mota J, Guerra S, Leandro C, Pinto A, Ribeiro JC, Duarte JA . Association of maturation, sex, and body fat in cardiorespiratory fitness. Am J Hum Biol 2002; 14: 707–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by the Grant FCT/PEST-OE/SAL/UI0617/2011.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M J Duncan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duncan, M., Martins, C., Silva, G. et al. Inverted BMI rather than BMI is a better predictor of DEXA determined body fatness in children. Eur J Clin Nutr 68, 638–640 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2013.285

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2013.285

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links