Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Experimental Oncology
  • Published:

High frequency of chromosome 9 deletion in ovarian cancer: evidence for three tumour-suppressor loci

Abstract

We have screened 33 ovarian tumours of various grades and stages for the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of markers on chromosome 9. LOH was detected in 26 cases (79%). Eleven tumours (33%) showed LOH of all informative markers. The remaining 15 cases had partial deletions. Of these, six (18%) had losses on 9p only, three (9%) had LOH confined to 9q and six (18%) had losses on both chromosome arms, four of which had a retention of hetereozygosity in between. There was no association between tumour grade stage or histopathology and any losses. High-density deletion mapping was carried out in 12 selected cases that had partial deletions of 9p and/or 9q. The deleted region on 9p included the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2 (CDKN2) locus and one tumour was found to have a homozygous deletion of CDKN2. LOH on 9q extended over a larger region. We found evidence for two regions of deletion on 9q, one at 9q34 and the other encompassing the nevoid basal cell carcinoma (Gorlin) syndrome locus on proximal 9q.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Devlin, J., Elder, P., Gabra, H. et al. High frequency of chromosome 9 deletion in ovarian cancer: evidence for three tumour-suppressor loci. Br J Cancer 73, 420–423 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.75

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.75

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links