ABSTRACT
Six human embryonic stem cell lines were established from surplus blastocysts. The cell lines expressed alkaline phosphatase and molecules typical of primate embryonic stem cells, including Oct-4, Nanog, TDGF1, Sox2, EBAF, Thy-1, FGF4, Rex-1, SSEA-3, SSEA-4, TRA-1-60 and TRA-1–81. Five of the six lines formed embryoid bodies that expressed markers of a variety of cell types; four of them formed teratomas with tissue types representative of all three embryonic germ layers. These human embryonic stem cells are capable of producing clones of undifferentiated morphology, and one of them was propagated to become a subline. Human embryonic stem cell lines from the Chinese population should facilitate stem cell research and may be valuable in studies of population genetics and ecology.
Similar content being viewed by others
INTRODUCTION
Since first reported in 1998 1, additional human embryonic stem (hES) cell lines have been established 2, 3, 4, 5. Although all hES cell lines can be propagated in an undifferentiated state, they vary significantly in other biological properties such as proliferation speed, cloning efficiency and tendency to differentiate spontaneously in culture 1, 6, 7. Thus, it is strongly recommended that more hES cell lines should be derived and studied, in order to better understand the mechanisms of variability and to screen cell lines suitable for various applications in regenerative medicine 8. For these reasons, six hES cell lines were established from the Chinese population and characterized in a comparative way.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
hES cell culture
Human embryos were produced for clinical purposes using an in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedure. Surplus embryos were used to derive hES cells. The protocols used for IVF and for hES cell derivation were in accordance with the stem cell guidelines issued by the Ministry of Science and Technology and the Ministry of Health, and were approved by the Ethical Committee of Xinhua Hospital.
From each blastocyst used, the inner cell mass (ICM) was isolated manually and cultured on irradiated mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) at a density of 25,000 cells/cm2. The culture medium consisted of 78% DMEM/F-12, 20% KnockOut serum replacement (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 2 mM L-glutamine, 1% non-essential amino acids, 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol, and 4-8 ng/ml human recombinant bFGF. Ten to fourteen days after initial plating, the outgrowth of the ICM was transferred to a dish with fresh feeders. Passaging of hES cells was performed by a combination of enzyme digestion (0.05% trypsin) and manual dissociation 9. hES cells were cryo-preserved in media consisting of 45% KnockOut serum replacement, 45% DMEM/F12 and 10% DMSO.
To determine the population doubling (PD) time, small sized colonies were marked, photographed once every 24 h, and the cell number in each colony was counted. PD values were calculated by the following formula: PD (h) = total time/Log2(N1/N2).
Cell cloning
hES colonies were dissociated into single cell using 0.05% trypsin. A total of 1 × 106 cells per cell line were seeded in the culture dish. Ten days later, the colonies were counted and their cloning efficiencies were calculated with the following formula: cloning efficiency = (number of colonies/100,000) × 100. To derive subclones from a cell line, individual cells were manually picked and placed in a 96-well culture plate.
in vitro differentiation
hES cells were harvested as large clumps and cultured in 78% DMEM, 20% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1% non-essential amino acids, and 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol, in a non-adherent Petri dish for 4-6 d to form embryoid bodies (EBs) 10. For further differentiation, EBs were transferred to gelatin coated culture dishes. After approximately 3 wks, a variety of morphologically distinct cells grew from the EBs. Total RNA extracted from these cells was analyzed for the expression of Neurofilament, Nestin, (ectoderm), Bone morphologic protein 4 (BMP4), Myoglobin, (mesoderm), α-fetoprotein and Albumin (endoderm) using the following primer sets:
Neurofilament: 5′-ACCCGACTCAGTTTCACCA, 5′-TTCTT CACCTTCACCTCCTTC
Nestin: 5′-GAGGACCAGAGTATTGTGAGAC, 5′-CACAGT GGTGCTTGAGTTTC
BMP4: 5′-TTTGTTCAAGATTGGCTGTC, 5′-AGATCCCGC ATGTAGTCC
Myoglobin: 5′-GCCACCAAGCACAAGATC, 5′-CTGCCCAC CTCTACTAAACA
α-fetoprotein: 5′-CTTTGGGCTGCTCGCTATGA, 5′-TGGCT TGGAAAGTTCGGGTC
Albumin: 5′-ATGCGCTATTAGTTCGTTA, 5′-TGTCACTT ACTGGCGTTTT
Teratoma formation
Approximately 2-5×106 morphologically undifferentiated hES cells were injected into the thigh muscles of 4-w-old NOD-SCID mice (from Shanghai Laboratory Animal Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences). After tumor formation, which was usually a period of 10 to 12 wks, the teratomas were dissected, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and examined histologically after hematoxylin and eosin staining.
RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from hES cells using Trizol® (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and then treated with DNase I at 37°C for 20 min. First strand synthesis was performed using Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI) and random Primers (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Primer sequences are listed in Tab. 1. PCR reactions were conducted using the following parameters: denaturation at 94°C for 4 min followed by 35 amplification cycles, denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 40 s. The cycles were followed by a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. Annealing temperatures were as follows: 55°C for Oct-4, TDGF1, Thy-1, FGF4; 60°C for Nanog, Sox2, EBAF; and 65°C for Rex1. Samples without reverse transcriptase, at the reverse transcription step, were used as the control for genomic DNA contamination. β-actin was used as an internal standard.
Immunocytochemistry
The immunocytochemical procedure was performed using protocols recommended by the manufacturer of the reagents. In brief, after washing with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), hES cell colonies were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature (RT). Colonies were washed twice (5-10 min each) in TBST buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20), treated with 0.1% Triton X-100/PBS for 10 min, washed twice (5-10 min each) in TBST buffer and incubated in 3% BSA/PBS (blocking solution) for 1 h. The primary antibodies used were against SSEA-1, SSEA-3, SSEA-4, TRA-1-60 and TRA-1-81 from Chemicon (Temecula, CA) and OCT-4 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). All antibodies were diluted in PBS and incubated with samples overnight at 4°C. Next day, colonies were washed thrice with TBST buffer and incubated with secondary antibodies at RT for 1 h. The secondary antibodies used were FITC-conjugated donkey anti-goat IgG, FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG + IgM, FITC-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG, and FITC-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG + IgM (Jackson, West Grove, PA). Fluorescent signals were visualized with a confocal microscope (Olympus).
To detect alkaline phosphatase activity, hES cell colonies were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at RT, rinsed in a Tris buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM MgCl2, pH9.5), and reacted with NBT/BCIP in darkness for approximately 15 min. The reaction was stopped when the color had developed sufficiently.
Karyotyping
hES cells were incubated with colcemid (40 μg/ml) for 3 h at 37°C 5% CO2. Cells were trypsinized and pelleted at 1,200 rpm for 5 min in an eppendorf centrifuge (5810 R), resuspended in 4 ml of hypotonic solution (KCl 0.56 g/100 ml H2O + sodium citrate 0.5 g/100 ml H2O), incubated at 37°C for 30 min, mixed with 2 ml of fixative (acetic acid:methanol = 1:3, added dropwise) and incubated at RT for 5 min. Cells were centrifuged at 1,200 rpm for 5 min, and then resuspended in 2 ml of fixer. The centrifugation and fixing steps were repeated three times. On the last repeat, cells were kept in the fixative and dropped onto pre-chilled glass slides. Chromosome spreads were placed at RT for 2 d, baked at 65°C for 4 h, digested with 0.1% trypsin (in 0.8% NaCl) at 37°C for 5 min, stained with 1% Giemsa solution for 15 min and photographed. At least 20 metaphase spreads were counted and five Giemsa banded karyotypes were analyzed for each hES cell line.
HLA type analysis
The HLA allele was determined using PEL-FREEZ ABC SSP UNITRAY II kits and PEL-FREEZ DR/DQ3T SSP UNITRAY kits (PEL-FREEZ® Biotechnology, Beijing, China), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
RESULTS
Derivation and long term culture of hES cells
ICM was placed on MEF for approximately 2 wks. The expanded ICM was transferred to new dishes with fresh feeders. Six cell lines were established from a total of forty-two blastocysts. hES cells grew as a monolayer with a high nuclear-to-cytoplasm ratio and prominent nucleoli. At early passages, some lines grew as cell clusters without a defined border. However, in prolonged culture, all colonies from the six lines (SH4, SH28, SH35, SH38, SH39, SH42) developed clear edges (Fig. 1). PD values were calculated using the H1 line 1 as the control, which showed a PD time of approximately 30 h in our culture. The six newly established cell lines showed PD values that ranged from 30 to 39 h (Tab. 2). At present, SH4, SH28, SH35, SH38, SH39, SH42 have reached approximately 279, 268, 200, 210, 172, 198 PD, respectively. Karyotypes of the six cell lines, SH4 at PD 171, SH28 at PD 124, SH35 at PD 80, SH38 at PD 90, SH39 at PD 75, and SH42 at PD 80, were analyzed by Giemsa banding. All had normal karyotypes of 46, with SH4, SH28, SH35 and SH38 as XX, and SH39 and SH42 as XY (Fig. 2). These results demonstrate that the cell lines can be cultured for prolonged periods without compromising their chromosomal stability.
Marker expression by hES cell lines
The cell lines were analyzed for expression of Class I markers 11 using the RT-PCR method. As shown in Fig. 3, each of the lines examined expressed a full panel of class I transcripts, including Oct-4, Nanog, TDGF1, Sox2, EBAF, Thy-1, FGF4, and Rex1. Expression of OCT-4 and Class II antigens by the cell lines was examined using specific antibodies. As shown in Fig. 4, all six lines were positively labeled with antibodies against OCT-4, SSEA-3, SSEA-4, TRA-1-60 and TRA-1-81, but not with the antibody against SSEA-1 (data not shown). These lines also expressed a high level of alkaline phosphatase activity (Fig. 4).
Cloning efficiency and derivation of a cloned subline
The cloning efficiencies of the hES cell lines were evaluated using the H1 cell line as a control. hES cell colonies were dissociated into individual cells using a trypsin digestion (0.05%, 37°C for 8 min) and plated on MEF in the standard medium for hES cells. In our culture, the H1 line gave a cloning efficiency of 0.413%. All six newly established cell lines yielded undifferentiated cell colonies. Four lines showed cloning efficiencies close to the H1 line, one line showed a particularly low cloning efficiency (SH39, 0.138%), and one line showed a particularly high cloning efficiency (SH35, 1.143%; see Tab. 2).
A cloned subline (SH35a) was established from the SH35 line. The SH35a line had a PD value of 33 h. It formed EBs and differentiated into a variety of cell types, in a manner similar to the parent line (Fig. 5). These results demonstrate that the SH35 line is capable of generating equipotent subclones.
Differentiation in vitro
EBs, which are cellular aggregates with round and smooth surfaces, were formed from all of the hES cell lines (Fig. 6A, C-F), with the exception of the SH28 line. For further differentiation, EBs from five hES cell lines were plated onto the surface of the culture dish. Differentiated cells grown out of the EBs were highly heterogeneous in morphology (Fig. 6B). Marker analyses with primers specific for Neurofilament, Nestin (ectoderm), BMP4, Myoglobin (mesoderm), α-fetoprotein and Albumin (endoderm) showed that differentiated cells from the five hES cell lines expressed markers representative of all three germ layers (Fig. 5) 12. In contrast to other hES cell lines, cell clumps from the SH28 line remained as clumps with irregular surfaces. Only a few SH28 cell clumps attached to the surface of the culture dish. In these clumps, we observed much less outgrowths of differentiated cells in comparison with other 5 cell lines (Fig. 6G). In high density culture, cell clumps from the SH28 line lost cells, while those at the bottom of the dish remained as a monolayer with morphological characteristics similar to undifferentiated hES cells (Fig. 6H).
Differentiation in vivo
The differentiation potentials of the six lines were further evaluated by observing teratoma formation. Dissociated hES cells were injected into the thigh muscles of NOD-SCID mice. Teratomas developed from cells of the SH35, SH38, SH39 and SH42 lines. These teratomas contained multi-differentiated tissues, such as keratinized stratified squamous epithelium, neural epithelium, pigment epithelium (ectoderm), bone, cartilage (mesoderm) and gut epithelium, as well as pseudostratified ciliated columnar epithelium (endoderm; see Fig. 7). The SH4 and SH28 lines did not produce teratomas, despite repeated injections into the thigh muscles.
HLA typing
Compatibility between the donor and recipient HLA genes is a critical factor in the success of cell or organ transplantation 13. The HLA type of a cell line is also important for the interpretation of experimental results related to immune responses. To facilitate future research using hES cells, we determined the HLA types of the six cell lines and presented the results in Tab. 3.
DISCUSSION
We established six hES cell lines from the Chinese population. All six cell lines had morphological characteristics typical of hES cells, and all six lines expressed class I and class II markers that are characteristic of hES cells. These lines were propagated for many generations in culture; the lines remained undifferentiated, and retained normal karyotypes. Five of the six lines (SH4, SH35, SH38, SH39, and SH42) were capable of forming EBs and four of them (SH35, SH38, SH39, and SH42) formed teratomas.
As previously reported for other cell lines 14, we observed variations among the six cell lines in proliferation speed, cloning efficiency, and the capacity to form teratomas. It is surprising that cells of the SH28 line expressed most of the markers of undifferentiated hES cells, but differentiated poorly. The reason for this observation needs to be further investigated.
Variability among hES cell lines may arise from properties of the founder cells as well as differences in culture conditions. hES cells are derived from the ICM of blastocysts, which consists of a transient cell population in a continuous process of differentiation into epiblasts and then into three primary germ layers 15. The procedure used to isolate hES cells is, in essence, a process of selection for cells that have acquired the ability to proliferate in response to the culture environment. Therefore, cell line characteristics may reflect the differentiation state of its founder cell(s). As more hES cell lines are established and analyzed, we may obtain additional detailed information regarding the differentiation process of the ICM.
References
Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 1998; 282:1145–7.
Stem Cell Information. National Institutes of Health. http://stemcells.nih.gov/research/registry/
Hovatta O, Mikkola M, Gertow K, et al. A culture system using human foreskin fibroblasts as feeder cells allows production of human embryonic stem cells. Hum Reprod 2003; 18:1404–9.
Zeng X, Miura T, Luo Y, et al. Properties of pluripotent human embryonic stem cells BG01 and BG02. Stem Cells 2004; 22:292–312.
Suss-Toby E, Gerecht-Nir S, Amit M, Manor D, Itskovitz-Eldor J . Derivation of a diploid human embryonic stem cell line from a mononuclear zygote. Hum Reprod 2004; 19:670 – 5.
Cowan CA, Klimanskaya I, McMahon J, et al. Derivation of embryonic stem-cell lines from human blastocysts. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1353–6.
Reubinoff BE, Pera MF, Fong CY, Trounson A, Bongso A . Embryonic stem cell lines from human blastocysts: somatic differentiation in vitro. Nat Biotechnol 2000; 18:399–404.
Gearhart J . New human embryonic stem-cell lines - more is better. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1275–6.
Hwang WS, Ryu YJ, Park JH, et al. Evidence of a pluripotent human embryonic stem cell line derived from a cloned blastocyst. Science 2004; 303:1669–74.
Amit M, Shariki C, Margulets V, Itskovitz-Eldor J . Feeder layer- and serum-free culture of human embryonic stem cells. Biol Reprod 2004; 70:837–45.
Brivanlou AH, Gage FH, Jaenisch R, et al. Setting standards for human embryonic stem cells. Science 2003; 300:913–6.
Itskovitz-Eldor J, Schuldiner M, Karsenti D, et al. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into embryoid bodies compromising the three embryonic germ layers. Mol Med 2000; 6:88–95.
Drukker M, Benvenisty N . The immunogenicity of human embryonic stem-derived cells. Trends Biotechnol 2004; 22:136–41.
Heins N, Englund MC, Sjoblom C, et al. Derivation, characterization, and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2004; 22:367–76.
Smith A . Embryonic stem cells. In: Marshak DR, Gardner RL, Gottlieb D, eds. Stem cell biology. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York 2001:205.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr. Su Chun ZHANG for discussion and guidance in stem cell biology. We thank Prof. Jian Xin CHU for technical assistance in histological analysis of teratomas sections, Tian Long GAO for confocal microscopic imaging, Qian WANG for support in immunochemical staining and PD calculation, Yong LU for the karyotyping protocol, You Ming ZHU for providing feeders, Aditi KARANDIKAR for help in manuscript preparation and Li An FAN for HLA typing.
This work was supported by grants from National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (No: 001CB509903, 001CB509904), Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China (973 Program) (No: 2001A A216121, 2004AA205010), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 30040003), Science and Technology Committee of Shanghai Municipality (No: 99DJ14002, 00DJ1 4033, 01DJ14003, 03DJ14017), Chinese Academy of Science (No: KSCX-2-3-08), Shanghai Municipal Education Commission and Shanghai Second Medical University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
FANG, Z., JIN, F., GAI, H. et al. Human embryonic stem cell lines derived from the Chinese population. Cell Res 15, 394–400 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cr.7290307
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cr.7290307
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
From Stem Cells to Oligodendrocytes: Prospects for Brain Therapy
Stem Cell Reviews (2007)