Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Epidemiology and Population Health

Relations between body mass index, laryngeal fat pads, and laryngeal airway configuration in adult men population

Abstract

Background

The impact of body mass index (BMI) on pharyngeal fat pads has been well studied, yet no study has assessed its associations on laryngeal morphology.

Objectives

To study the associations of BMI differences on laryngeal morphology in adult males using computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans.

Methods

All adult male patients who underwent head and neck CTAs between 2011 and 2018 were initially included and categorized according to their BMI: (1) BMI < 20; (2) 20 ≤ BMI < 25; (3) 25 ≤ BMI < 30; (4) 30 ≤ BMI < 35; and (5) BMI ≥ 35. Anatomical measurements included pre-epiglottic and paraglottic fat-pad dimensions, airway width at the epiglottis tip and base, and epiglottis angle. For statistical analysis, BMI was regarded both as a categorical and continuous variable.

Results

One hundred and five scans were included. BMI ranged from 15.90 to 44.40 kg/m2. Significant differences were found in pre-epiglottic and paraglottic fat measurements between BMI subgroups 1–5 (Pre-epiglottic fat depth: 17.75, 17.74, 19.04, 20.73, and 21.09 mm, respectively, P = 0.005, correlation 0.343, and P < 0.001 in continuous measurement; Paraglottic space average width: 3.5, 5.4, 5.46, 6.85, and 7.38 mm, P < 0.001, correlation 0.532, and P < 0.001 in continuous measurement). As BMI increased, the epiglottis-hard-palate angle increased (56.4°, 55.3°, 65.2°, 64°, and 68.4°, P = 0.001, correlation 0.354, and P < 0.001 in continuous measurement). No significant difference was found in airway width between subgroups at the epiglottis tip or base. Yet, in continuous variables analysis, a significant negative correlation was found between BMI scores and the airway width at the epiglottis base (−0.226, P = 0.02).

Conclusions

In adult males, BMI is correlated with laryngeal fat-pad volume, affecting its morphology and airway width. Clinical implications regarding obstructive sleep apnea and voice quality should be further investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Anatomic measurements of the study.
Fig. 2: Comparison of the study’s measurements divided into the BMI subgroups.
Fig. 3: Association of BMI with anatomic measurements of the study—continuous variable analysis.
Fig. 4: Impact of body mass index (BMI) on the epiglottis-hard-palate angle.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ciscar MA, Juan G, Martínez V, Ramón M, Lloret T, Mínguez J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pharynx in OSA patients and healthy subjects. Eur Respir J. 2001;17:79–86. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.01.17100790.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Whittle AT, Marshall I, Mortimore IL, Wraith PK, Sellar RJ, Douglas NJ. Neck soft tissue and fat distribution: comparison between normal men and women by magnetic resonance imaging. Thorax. 1999;54:323–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.54.4.323.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Welch KC, Foster GD, Ritter CT, Wadden TA, Arens R, Maislin G, et al. A novel volumetric magnetic resonance imaging paradigm to study upper airway anatomy. Sleep. 2002;25:530–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/25.5.530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yiu Y, Tibbetts KM, Simpson CB, Matrka LA. Shar Pei larynx: supraglottic and postcricoid mucosal redundancy and its association with medical comorbidities. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019;128:121–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Da Cunha MGB, Passerotti GH, Weber R, Zilberstein B, Cecconello I. Voice feature characteristic in morbid obese population. Obes Surg. 2011;21:340–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9959-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamdan AL, Safadi B, Chamseddine G, Kasty M, Turfe ZA, Ziade G. Effect of weight loss on voice after bariatric surgery. J Voice. 2014;28:618–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.03.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. WHO expert consultation. Public health appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363:157–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dedhia RC, Rosen CA, Soose RJ. What is the role of the larynx in adult obstructive sleep apnea? Laryngoscope. 2014;124:1029–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamashiro Y, Kryger M. Is laryngeal descent associated with increased risk for obstructive sleep apnea?. Chest. 2012;141:1407–13. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.10-3238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kezirian EJ, White DP, Malhotra A, Ma W, McCulloch CE, Goldberg AN. Interrater reliability of drug-induced sleep endoscopy. Arch Otolaryngol. 2010;136:393–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2010.26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Solomon NP, Helou LB, Dietrich-Burns K, Stojadinovic A. Do obesity and weight loss affect vocal function? Semin Speech Lang. 2011;32:31–42. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1271973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamdan AL, Al-Barazi R, Tabri D, Saade R, Kutkut I, Sinno S, et al. Relationship between acoustic parameters and body mass analysis in young males. J Voice. 2012;26:144–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.01.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Friedman AD. Adiposity, estrogen, and voice: the opera has just begun. Menopause. 2011;18:723–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/gme.0b013e31821f7ee9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yanagisawa E, Estill J, Mambrino LTD. Supraglottic contributions to pitch raising. Videoendoscopic study with spectroanalysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1991;100:19–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roers F, Mürbe D, Sundberg J. Voice classification and vocal tract of singers: a study of x-ray images and morphology. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009;125:503–12. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3026326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oded Cohen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lahav, Y., Adi, M., Arberboy, E. et al. Relations between body mass index, laryngeal fat pads, and laryngeal airway configuration in adult men population. Int J Obes 45, 288–295 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-0631-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-0631-6

Search

Quick links