Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Magnetospheric flux erosion events are flux transfer events

Abstract

Recent results have shown that magnetic reconnection at the Earth's dayside magnetopause manifests itself most frequently as an impulsive process. Haerendel et al.1, using data from the HEOS 2 spacecraft, were the first to notice short time scale magnetic field perturbations inside the magnetopause, which they interpreted as flux erosion events resulting from transient reconnection in the polar cusp regions. Using higher time resolution data from the ISEE 1 and 2 satellite pair, Russell and Elphic2 subsequently discovered certain characteristic magnetic field signatures in the magnetosheath, which they termed flux transfer events (FTEs). They also interpreted these events in terms of transient, localized reconnection. It has often been suggested3–7 that Haerendel et al.'s flux erosion events and Russell and Elphic's FTEs have a close physical connection, but proof of this has so far been lacking. Here we show that flux erosion events and flux transfer events are indeed the same physical phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haerendel, G., Paschmann, G., Sckopke, N., Rosenbauer, H. & Hedgecock, P. C. J. geophys. Res. 83, 3195–3216 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Russell, C. T. & Elphic, R. C. Space Sci. Rev. 22, 681–715 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cowley, S. W. H. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 20, 531–565 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Saunders, M. A. J. Geophys. 52, 190–198 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Russell, C. T. in Dynamics of the Magnetosphere (ed. Akasofu, S.-I.) 3–21 (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Paschmann, G. et al. J. geophys. Res. 87, 2159–2168 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Haerendel, G. & Paschmann, G. in Magnetospheric Plasma Physics (ed. Nishida, A.) 49–142 (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1982).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Dungey, J. W. Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 47–48 (1961).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Burch, J. L. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 12, 363–378 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cowley, S. W. H. in High Latitude Space Plasma Physics (eds Hultqvist, B. & Hagfors, T.) 225–249 (Plenum, New York, 1983).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Paschmann, G. et al. Nature 282, 243–246 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sonnerup, B. U. Ö et al. J. geophys. Res. 86, 10049–10067 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gosling, J. T. et al. J. geophys. Res. 87, 2147–2158 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sonnerup, B. U. Ö in Physics of Solar Planetary Environments (ed. Williams, D. J.) 541–557 (American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Formisano, V., Domingo, V. & Wenzel, K. P. Planet. Space Sci. 27, 1137–1149 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rijnbeek, R. P., Cowley, S. W. H., Southwood, D. J. & Russell, C. T. J. geophys. Res., 89, 786–800 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cowling, T. G. in Magnetohydrodynamics, 8–10 (Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1976).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Daly, P. W., Saunders, M. A., Rijnbeek, R. P., Sckopke, N. & Russell, C. T. J. geophys. Res. (in the press).

  19. Rijnbeek, R. P., Cowley, S. W. H., Southwood, D. J. & Russell, C. T. Nature 300, 23–26 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cowley, S. W. H., Southwood, D. J. & Saunders, M. A. Planet. Space Sci. 31, 1237–1258 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Saunders, M. A., Russell, C. T. & Sckopke, N. Geophys. Res. Lett., 11, 131–134 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Berchem, J. & Russell, C. T. J. geophys. Res. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rijnbeek, R., Cowley, S. Magnetospheric flux erosion events are flux transfer events. Nature 309, 135–138 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/309135a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/309135a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing