Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Peculiarities of binary galaxies

Abstract

A recent analysis of a sample of close binary galaxies1 by White and Valdes2 has revealed some peculiar features: in particular, they tend to be brighter than field galaxies. Binary galaxies are important because the relative simplicity of the two-body problem in dynamics should make it possible to obtain good estimates of the masses of paired galaxies. This would help in determining whether there are massive haloes of dark, unseen matter, and in the problem area of galaxy formation. Much effort has therefore been expended (ref. 3 and refs therein), but conclusions about the existence of massive haloes and about the mass-to-light ratios have varied. Because we do not have complete information, various statistical assumptions must be made in these analyses. Detailed arguments2 suggest that one of these assumptions has been in error in previous work. We present a test which supports this claim. (The sample used here and in ref. 2 seems to be the only set of paired galaxies with quantitative selection criteria and velocity information for an unbiased subsample.) Furthermore, it was shown2 that binary galaxies are drawn from a luminosity function which has a characteristic luminosity brighter than that for field galaxies by almost one whole magnitude. We discuss one of the possible explanations and some suggestive evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Turner, E. L. Astrophys. J. 208, 20 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. White, S. D. M. & Valdes, F. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. (in the press).

  3. Turner, E. L. Astrophys. J. 208, 304 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Peterson, S. D. thesis, Cornell Univ. (1978).

  5. Noerdlinger, P. D. Astrophys. J. 229, 877 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmidt, M. Astrophys. J. 151, 393 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. White, S. D. M. & Sharp, N. A. Nature 269, 395 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sharp, N. A., Lin, D. N. C. & White, S. D. M. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 187, 287 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Larson, R. B. & Tinsley, B. M. Astrophys. J. 219, 46 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Holmberg, E. Medd Lund. Astr. Obs. Ser II, No. 136 (1958).

  11. White, S. D. M. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 184, 185 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gott, J. R. III & Turner, E. L. Astrophys. J. Lett. 232, L79 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharp, N., Jones, B. Peculiarities of binary galaxies. Nature 283, 275–277 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/283275a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/283275a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing