Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Further evidence for a random transition in the cell cycle

Abstract

SEVERAL proposals have been advanced to explain how cell cycle duration (and hence proliferation rates) is governed1–3. It is important to establish which (if any) of these models is correct as they imply differing biological mechanisms of cell-cycle control. The transition probability hypothesis divides the cell cycle into two phases A and B, the transition from A to B occurring at random3. As a consequence a graph of the logarithm of the percentage of undivided cells (αt) against time after mitosis (the α curve) shows two components since αt will be 100% for times up to the minimum cycle time TB (the duration of B phase) and decay exponentially thereafter. This model has been criticised on the grounds that other models of the cell cycle can generate similar α curves and on the basis of the α curve it is difficult to tell these models apart4. In what follows the exponential nature of the distribution of differences of sister cell cycle times (the β curve) is shown to be a unique property of cell cycle models containing an exponentially distributed phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kubitschek, H. E. Expl cell. Res. 26, 439–450 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmid, P. Expl cell. Res. 45, 471–486 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith, J. A. & Martin, L. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70, 1263–1267 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wheals, A. E. Nature 267, 647 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Minor, P. D. & Smith, J. A. Nature 248, 241–243 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shields, R. & Smith, J. A. J. cell. Physiol. 91, 345–356 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shields, R. Nature 267, 704–707 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, J. A. & Martin, L. in Cell Cycle Controls (eds Padilla, G. M., Cameron, I. L. & Zimmerman, A.) 43–60 (Academic, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson, L. H. & Suit, H. D. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 15, 347–362 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SHIELDS, R. Further evidence for a random transition in the cell cycle. Nature 273, 755–758 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/273755a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/273755a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing