Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Were Archean continental geothermal gradients much steeper than those of today?

Abstract

ARCHEAN geothermal gradients have often been supposed to be much steeper than those of today1 –6. Because heat generation from the decay of radioactive nuclides in the Earth was then much greater4,7,8, extra heat, if it escaped by conduction, must have been carried along steeper thermal gradients. Significant measurements of terrestrial conductive thermal gradients are very difficult to obtain, and estimates of thermal gradients in the past are even harder to make. Estimates made from igneous and metamorphic rock occurrences are of limited value both because igneous rocks occur at levels in the earth shallower by unknown amounts than those at which they form and because nearly all igneous and metamorphic rocks are formed at plate boundaries where thermal gradients are much steeper than within plates. In plate margin areas, advective and convective processes dominate so that the normal conductive gradient of the lithosphere can only be measured or estimated in areas away from plate boundaries. We show here that the rocks of the Superior Province (formed roughly in the interval 3,100–2,500 Myr ago) were not subjected to steep regional geothermal gradients after their assembly into a continent by lateral accretion of island arcs8, and hence that the extra Archean heat escaped the Earth in some way other than by conduction through the continent. We suggest that this escape was mainly by cooling of the ocean floor as a boundary conduction layer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fyfe, W. S. Phil. Trans. R. Soc., Lond. A 273, 315 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baer, A. J. PreCambrian Res. 5, 249 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Strong, D. F. & Stevens, R. K. Nature 249, 545 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lambert, R. St. J. in The Early History of the Earth 363 (ed. Windley, B. F. Wiley, London, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Windley, B. F. in The Evolving Continents 62 (Wiley, London, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lubimova, E. A. Monog. Am. geophys. Un. 13, 63 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, W. H. K. thesis, Univ. California.

  8. Burke, K., Dewey, J. F. & Kidd, W. S. F. in The Early History of the Earth 113 (ed. Windley, B. F. Wiley, London, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goodwin, A. M. Geol. Assoc. Can. Spec. Paper 11 527 (1972)

  10. Wise, D. U. in The Geology of Continental Margins 83 (eds Burk, C. A. & Drake, C. L. (Springer, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hall, D. H. Geol. Ass. Can. Spec. Paper 9 137 (1971).

  12. Harris, P. G., Kennedy, W. Q. & Scarfe, C. M. Geol. J. Spec. Issue 2, 187 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dewey, J. F. & Burke, K. J. Geol. 81, 683–692 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Clark, S. P. & Ringwood, A. E., Rev. Geophys. 2, 35 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brooks, C. & Hart, S. R. Geology 2, 107 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McKenzie, D. P. & Weiss, N. O. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 42, 131 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BURKE, K., KIDD, W. Were Archean continental geothermal gradients much steeper than those of today?. Nature 272, 240–241 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/272240a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/272240a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing