Abstract
The American Urological Association has published guidelines for the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis in the prevention of surgical site infection. The guidelines recommend that antimicrobial prophylaxis is required for most urologic operations, including transurethral endoscopic, open and laparoscopic procedures. By contrast, the guidelines published by the European Association of Urology recommend that no procedures require antimicrobial prophylaxis, except surgery that involves the use of bowel segments. The main reason for these differences is that both guidelines are largely based on data from general surgery, because few well-controlled, randomized studies of urologic surgery have been reported. Controversies have arisen because of differing views regarding the applicability of evidence from general to urologic surgery. Particularly controversial are the guidelines for clean-contaminated procedures, such as entering the urinary tract and using bowel segments. This commentary discusses the practical application of these new guidelines by considering previously published recommendations.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Mangram AJ et al. (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20: 250–278
Naber KG et al. (2001) EAU guidelines for the management of urinary and male genital tract infections. Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Working Group of the Health Care Office (HCO) of the European Association of Urology (EAU). Eur Urol 40: 576–588
Grabe M (2004) Controversies in antibiotic prophylaxis in urology. Int J Antimicrob Agents 23 (Suppl 1): S17–S23
Matsumoto T et al. (2007) Japanese guidelines for prevention of perioperative infections in urological field. Int J Urol 14: 890–909
Wolf JS Jr et al. (2008) Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol 179: 1379–1390
Matsukawa M et al. (2001) Staphylococcus aureus bacteriuria and surgical site infections by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Int J Antimicrob Agents 17: 327–329
Yamamoto S et al. (2005) Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in urology: a multi-center prospective study. J Chemother 17: 189–197
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank members of the Japanese Society of UTI Cooperative Study Group for their critical comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yamamoto, S., Shima, H. Controversies in antimicrobial prophylaxis for urologic surgery: more up-to-date evidence is needed. Nat Rev Urol 5, 588–589 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1230
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1230