Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

Controversies in antimicrobial prophylaxis for urologic surgery: more up-to-date evidence is needed

Abstract

The American Urological Association has published guidelines for the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis in the prevention of surgical site infection. The guidelines recommend that antimicrobial prophylaxis is required for most urologic operations, including transurethral endoscopic, open and laparoscopic procedures. By contrast, the guidelines published by the European Association of Urology recommend that no procedures require antimicrobial prophylaxis, except surgery that involves the use of bowel segments. The main reason for these differences is that both guidelines are largely based on data from general surgery, because few well-controlled, randomized studies of urologic surgery have been reported. Controversies have arisen because of differing views regarding the applicability of evidence from general to urologic surgery. Particularly controversial are the guidelines for clean-contaminated procedures, such as entering the urinary tract and using bowel segments. This commentary discusses the practical application of these new guidelines by considering previously published recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Mangram AJ et al. (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20: 250–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Naber KG et al. (2001) EAU guidelines for the management of urinary and male genital tract infections. Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Working Group of the Health Care Office (HCO) of the European Association of Urology (EAU). Eur Urol 40: 576–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grabe M (2004) Controversies in antibiotic prophylaxis in urology. Int J Antimicrob Agents 23 (Suppl 1): S17–S23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Matsumoto T et al. (2007) Japanese guidelines for prevention of perioperative infections in urological field. Int J Urol 14: 890–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolf JS Jr et al. (2008) Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol 179: 1379–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Matsukawa M et al. (2001) Staphylococcus aureus bacteriuria and surgical site infections by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Int J Antimicrob Agents 17: 327–329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamamoto S et al. (2005) Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in urology: a multi-center prospective study. J Chemother 17: 189–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank members of the Japanese Society of UTI Cooperative Study Group for their critical comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shingo Yamamoto.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamamoto, S., Shima, H. Controversies in antimicrobial prophylaxis for urologic surgery: more up-to-date evidence is needed. Nat Rev Urol 5, 588–589 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1230

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1230

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing