Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Differential Markers for Regionalization

Journal of Perinatology volume 20, pages 366–372 (2000)Cite this article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To examine the site of delivery for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants and infants with major congenital malformations (MCM) within an established system of perinatal regionalization.

STUDY DESIGN:

A retrospective study of site of delivery for VLBW infants and infants born with MCM (tracheoesophageal fistula/esophageal atresia, diaphragmatic hernia, or gastroschisis/omphalocele) from 1990 through 1995 in Ohio.

RESULTS:

A total of 59.8% of VLBW infants and 36.1% of MCM infants were born in a level III hospital. There was a significant trend toward a decrease in VLBW infants (p < 0.01) and an increase in MCM infants (p < 0.05) born in a level III hospital between 1990 and 1995. There were significant regional variations among the six perinatal regions in Ohio in the proportion of both VLBW and MCM infants born in a tertiary center.

CONCLUSION: Using the traditional marker of VLBW to assess regionalization in one state, we found significant variation in site of delivery among the perinatal regions and over the time course of the study. The delivery of infants with MCM at level III centers may be an alternative measure of regionalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Health Policy and Clinical Effectiveness (S. M., H. D. A., P. J. S., P. H. P., U. R. K.), Cincinnati, OH

    Sanjeev Mehta BA, Harry D Atherton BSE E MS, Pamela J Schoettker MS, Paul H Perlstein MD & Uma R Kotagal MBBS MSc

  2. Division of Neonatology (P. H. P., Department of Pediatrics, U. R. K.), Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH

    Paul H Perlstein MD & Uma R Kotagal MBBS MSc

  3. Institute of Health Policy and Health Services Research (R. W. H., U. R. K.), University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH

    Richard W Hornung DrPH & Uma R Kotagal MBBS MSc

Authors
  1. Sanjeev Mehta BA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Harry D Atherton BSE E MS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pamela J Schoettker MS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Richard W Hornung DrPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Paul H Perlstein MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Uma R Kotagal MBBS MSc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uma R Kotagal MBBS MSc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehta, S., Atherton, H., Schoettker, P. et al. Differential Markers for Regionalization. J Perinatol 20, 366–372 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200391

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200391

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links