Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Short Cervical Length by Ultrasound and Cerclage

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To determine whether gravidas with short cervical length on endovaginal ultrasound examination, not in preterm labor, who underwent cervical cerclage have better outcomes compared with those with no cerclage.

METHODS:

This is an observational study in which data were collected prospectively on women who had ultrasound endovaginal cervical length measurement and were not in preterm labor. The subgroup of women who were ≤26 weeks’ at cervical measurement was analyzed separately. Short cervix was defined as ≤30 mm. After delivery, charts were reviewed for management and outcomes, performed at the discretion of the attending obstetrician. Two study groups were defined: those with cerclage and those with no cerclage. Predictor variables were cerclage and cervical lengths. Outcome variables were birth weight, gestational age at delivery, and neonatal outcomes. Data were analyzed using the χ-squared, Fisher’s exact, and Student’s t-tests, a p value of <0.05 was considered to be significant.

RESULTS:

A total of 85 patients with cervical lengths of ≤30 mm were identified; of these 43 had cerclage, and 42 did not. The latter had bedrest, tocolytics, or no intervention. Indications for cervical length measurement were similar in both groups, as were age, insurance status, cervical measurements, preterm premature rupture of membranes, and mode of delivery. The mean gestational age at delivery and birth weight in the cerclage group (34.0 ± 5.4 weeks’; 2530 ± 905 gm) were greater than in the no cerclage group (32.0 ± 6.0 weeks’, 2084 ± 1085 gm, p values of <0.04 and <0.04, respectively). Analysis for the subgroup of women who were ≤26 weeks’ at first measurement revealed similar results. The relative risk for delivering at <30 weeks’ gestation, for incrementally shorter cervices, was less in the cerclage group.

CONCLUSION: Cerclage in gravidas with short cervix measured by endovaginal ultrasound, not in preterm labor, may be associated with neonates of greater gestational age and birth weight, with fewer of these parturients delivering before 30 weeks’ gestation. A prospective randomized trial of treatment modalities for asymptomatic shortened cervix is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judith U Hibbard MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hibbard, J., Snow, J. & Moawad, A. Short Cervical Length by Ultrasound and Cerclage. J Perinatol 20, 161–165 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200333

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200333

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links