Abstract
Dramatic supraglacial lake drainage events in Greenland and Antarctica are enabled by rapid hydrofracture propagation through ice over 1 km thick. Here we present a slower mode of hydrofracture, where hairline surface fractures intersect supraglacial streams, and hypothesize that penetration depth is critically limited by water supply and englacial refreezing. We develop a model of stream-fed hydrofracture, and find that under most conditions in Greenland, 2-cm-wide fractures can penetrate hundreds of metres before freezing closed. Conditions for full-depth hydrofracture are more restricted, requiring larger meltwater channels and/or warm englacial conditions. Given the abundance of streams and surface fractures across Greenland and Antarctica’s expanding ablation zones, we propose that stream-driven hydrofractures are ubiquitous—even where distant from supraglacial lakes and crevasse fields. This intriguing process remains undetectable by current satellite remote sensing, yet has two major impacts that warrant further investigation. First, by driving widespread cryohydrologic warming at depths far greater than surface crevassing, it explains a consistent cold bias in modelled englacial thermal profiles. Second, the associated reduction in ice viscosity and increased damage accumulation act to enhance the vulnerability of ice sheets and shelves to dynamic instability as supraglacial drainage networks expand inland to higher elevations.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
MAR v3.11.2 data were downloaded from ftp://ftp.climato.be/fettweis/.MARv3.11.2/ (last access: 24 June 2022).
Code availability
Python scripts for the fracture propagation model are available at https://github.com/davemchandler/SupraglacialStreamFractures or on request from the corresponding author.
References
Das, S. B. et al. Fracture propagation to the base of the Greenland Ice Sheet during supraglacial lake drainage. Science 320, 778–781 (2008).
Doyle, S. H. et al. Ice tectonic deformation during the rapid in situ drainage of a supraglacial lake on the Greenland Ice Sheet. Cryosphere 7, 129–140 (2013).
Tedesco, M. et al. Ice dynamic response to two modes of surface lake drainage on the Greenland ice sheet. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 034007 (2013).
Scambos, T. et al. Ice shelf disintegration by plate bending and hydro-fracture: satellite observations and model results of the 2008 Wilkins ice shelf break-ups. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 280, 51–60 (2009).
Arthur, J. F., Stokes, C., Jamieson, S. S. R., Carr, J. R. & Leeson, A. A. Recent understanding of Antarctic supraglacial lakes using satellite remote sensing. Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ. 44, 837–869 (2020).
Christoffersen, P. et al. Cascading lake drainage on the Greenland Ice Sheet triggered by tensile shock and fracture. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–12 (2018).
Doyle, S. H. et al. Persistent flow acceleration within the interior of the Greenland ice sheet. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 899–905 (2014).
Flowers, G. E. Hydrology and the future of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–4 (2018).
Williams, J. J., Gourmelen, N. & Nienow, P. Complex multi-decadal ice dynamical change inland of marine-terminating glaciers on the Greenland Ice Sheet. J. Glaciol. 67, 833–846 (2021).
Leeson, A. A., Forster, E., Rice, A., Gourmelen, N. & van Wessem, J. M. Evolution of supraglacial lakes on the Larsen B Ice Shelf in the decades before it collapsed. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL085591 (2020).
Scambos, T., Bohlander, J., Shuman, C. & Skvarca, P. Glacier acceleration and thinning after ice shelf collapse in the Larsen B embayment, Antarctica. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L18402 (2004).
Chandler, D. M. et al. Evolution of the subglacial drainage system beneath the Greenland Ice Sheet revealed by tracers. Nat. Geosci. 6, 195–198 (2013).
Chandler, D. M. et al. Rapid development and persistence of efficient subglacial drainage under 900 m-thick ice in Greenland. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 566, 116982 (2021).
Jones, C., Ryan, J., Holt, T. & Hubbard, A. Structural glaciology of Isunguata Sermia West Greenland. J. Maps 14, 517–527 (2018).
Phillips, T., Rajaram, H. & Steffen, K. Cryo-hydrologic warming: a potential mechanism for rapid thermal response of ice sheets. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L20503 (2010).
Phillips, T., Rajaram, H., Colgan, W., Steffen, K. & Abdalati, W. Evaluation of cryo-hydrologic warming as an explanation for increased ice velocities in the wet snow zone, Sermeq Avannarleq, West Greenland. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 118, 1241–1256 (2013).
Lüthi, M. P. et al. Heat sources within the Greenland Ice Sheet: dissipation, temperate paleo-firn and cryo-hydrologic warming. Cryosphere 9, 245–253 (2015).
Seguinot, J. et al. Englacial warming indicates deep crevassing in Bowdoin Glacier, Greenland. Front. Earth Sci. 8, 65 (2020).
Albrecht, T. & Levermann, A. Fracture-induced softening for large-scale ice dynamics. Cryosphere 8, 587–605 (2014).
Krug, J., Weiss, J., Gagliardini, O. & Durand, G. Combining damage and fracture mechanics to model calving. Cryosphere 8, 2101–2117 (2014).
Banwell, A. F. et al. Supraglacial lakes on the Larsen B ice shelf, Antarctica, and at Paakitsoq, West Greenland: a comparative study. Ann. Glaciol. 55, 1–8 (2014).
Fitzpatrick, A. A. W. et al. A decade (2002–2012) of supraglacial lake volume estimates across Russell Glacier, West Greenland. Cryosphere 8, 107–121 (2014).
Pope, A. et al. Estimating supraglacial lake depth in West Greenland using Landsat 8 and comparison with other multispectral methods. Cryosphere 10, 15–27 (2016).
Weertman, J. Dislocation Based Fracture Mechanics (World Scientific, 1996).
van der Veen, C. J. Fracture mechanics approach to penetration of surface crevasses on glaciers. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 27, 31–47 (1998).
Alley, R. B., Dupont, T. K., Parizek, B. R. & Anandakrishnan, S. Access of surface meltwater to beds of sub-freezing glaciers: preliminary insights. Ann. Glaciol. 40, 8–14 (2005).
Clason, C., Mair, D. W. F., Burgess, D. O. & Nienow, P. W. Modelling the delivery of supraglacial meltwater to the ice/bed interface: application to southwest Devon Ice Cap, Nunavut, Canada. J. Glaciol. 58, 361–374 (2012).
Duddu, R., Bassis, J. N. & Waisman, H. A numerical investigation of surface crevasse propagation in glaciers using nonlocal continuum damage mechanics. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 3064–3068 (2013).
Kreyzsig, E. Advanced Engineering Mathematics 5th edition (John Wiley & Sons, 1983).
Smith, L. C. et al. Supraglacial river forcing of subglacial water storage and diurnal ice sheet motion. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL091418 (2021).
Hambrey, M. J. et al. Structure and changing dynamics of a polythermal valley glacier on a centennial timescale: Midre Lovénbreen, Svalbard. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 110, F01006 (2005).
Krawczynski, M. J., Behn, M. D., Das, S. B. & Joughin, I. Constraints on the lake volume required for hydro-fracture through ice sheets. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L10501 (2009).
van der Veen, C. J. Fracture mechanics approach to penetration of bottom crevasses on glaciers. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 27, 213–223 (1998).
McDowell, I. E., Humphrey, N. F., Harper, J. T. & Meierbachtol, T. W. The cooling signature of basal crevasses in a hard-bedded region of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Cryosphere 15, 897–907 (2021).
Everett, A. et al. Annual down-glacier drainage of lakes and water-filled crevasses at Helheim Glacier, southeast Greenland. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 121, 1819–1833 (2016).
Walder, J. S. Stability of sheet flow of water beneath temperate glaciers and implications for glacier surging. J. Glaciol. 28, 273–293 (1982).
Harrington, J. A., Humphrey, N. F. & Harper, J. T. Temperature distribution and thermal anomalies along a flowline of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Ann. Glaciol. 56, 98–104 (2015).
Colgan, W. et al. Glacier crevasses: observations, models, and mass balance implications. Rev. Geophys. 54, 119–161 (2016).
Poinar, K., Joughin, I., Lenaerts, J. T. M. & Van Den Broeke, M. R. Englacial latent-heat transfer has limited influence on seaward ice flux in western Greenland. J. Glaciol. 63, 1–16 (2017).
Pollard, D., DeConto, R. M. & Alley, R. B. Potential Antarctic Ice Sheet retreat driven by hydrofracturing and ice cliff failure. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 412, 112–121 (2015).
Langley, E. S., Leeson, A. A., Stokes, C. R. & Jamieson, S. S. R. Seasonal evolution of supraglacial lakes on an East Antarctic outlet glacier. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 8563–8571 (2016).
Kingslake, J., Ely, J. C., Das, I. & Bell, R. E. Widespread movement of meltwater onto and across Antarctic ice shelves. Nature 544, 349–352 (2017).
Corr, D., Leeson, A., McMillan, M., Zhang, C. & Barnes, T. An inventory of supraglacial lakes and channels across the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 14, 209–228 (2022).
Bell, R. E. et al. Antarctic ice shelf potentially stabilized by export of meltwater in surface river. Nature 544, 344–348 (2017).
Sundal, A. V. et al. Evolution of supra-glacial lakes across the Greenland Ice Sheet. Remote Sens. Environ. 113, 2164–2171 (2009).
Selmes, N., Murray, T. & James, T. D. Fast draining lakes on the Greenland Ice Sheet. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L15501 (2011).
Doyle, S. H. et al. Physical conditions of fast glacier flow: 1. Measurements from boreholes drilled to the bed of Store Glacier, West Greenland. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 123, 324–348 (2018).
Hubbard, B. et al. Borehole-based characterization of deep mixed-mode crevasses at a Greenlandic outlet glacier. AGU Adv. 2, e2020AV000291 (2021).
Iken, A., Echelmeyer, K., Harrison, W. & Funk, M. Mechanisms of fast flow in Jakobshavns Isbræ, West Greenland: Part I. Measurements of temperature and water level in deep boreholes. J. Glaciol. 39, 15–25 (1993).
Colosio, P., Tedesco, M., Ranzi, R. & Fettweis, X. Surface melting over the Greenland ice sheet derived from enhanced resolution passive microwave brightness temperatures (1979–2019). Cryosphere 15, 2623–2646 (2021).
Hersbach, H. et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorolog. Soc. 146, 1999–2049 (2020).
Rivalta, E., Taisne, B., Bunger, A. P. & Katz, R. F. A review of mechanical models of dike propagation: schools of thought, results and future directions. Tectonophysics 638, 1–42 (2015).
Van Der Veen, C. J. & Whillans, I. M. Force budget: I. Theory and numerical methods. J. Glaciol. 35, 53–60 (1989).
Broek, D. Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics 4th edition (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1986).
van der Veen, C. J. Fracture propagation as means of rapidly transferring surface meltwater to the base of glaciers. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L01501 (2007).
Weertman, J. Can a water-filled crevasse reach the bottom surface of a glacier?. IASH.Publ. 95, 135–139 (1973).
Franchini, M. & Lanza, L. Use of Torricelli’s equation for describing leakages in pipes of different elastic materials, diameters and orifice shape and dimensions. Procedia Eng. 89, 290–297 (2014).
De Marchis, M. & Milici, B. Leakage estimation in water distribution network: effect of the shape and size cracks. Water Resour. Manage. 33, 1167–1183 (2019).
Rubin, A. M. Propagation of magma-filled cracks. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 23, 287–336 (1995).
Bartholomew, I. et al. Short-term variability in Greenland Ice Sheet motion forced by time-varying meltwater drainage: implications for the relationship between subglacial drainage system behavior and ice velocity. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 117, F03002 (2012).
Lindbäck, K. et al. High-resolution ice thickness and bed topography of a land-terminating section of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 6, 331–338 (2014).
Booth, A. et al. Thin-layer effects in glaciological seismic amplitude-versus-angle (AVA) analysis: implications for characterising a subglacial till unit, Russell Glacier, West Greenland. Cryosphere 6, 909–922 (2012).
Acknowledgements
D.C. acknowledges support for fieldwork from UK NERC grant NE/H023879/1. A.H. gratefully acknowledges an Arctic Five Chair, funding from the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence scheme (CAGE & IC3 - Grants 223259 & 332635), The University of Oulu - Arctic Interactions and the Academy of Finland PROFI4 initative (Grant 318930). Field observations were kindly supported by The Royal Geographical Society (Walters Kundert Fellowship), the Greenland Analogue Project (GAP-SPB), Lars Ostenfeld/Caspar Haarløv (‘Into the Ice’) and James Reed/Ted Giffords (BBC ‘Frozen Planet II’).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.C. developed the model; both authors contributed to writing the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Geoscience thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Active hydrofracture and moulin genesis where surface fractures intersected a supraglacial river.
This site is on the K-Transect, West Greenland (67.124∘N 49.298∘W, ice thickness ~ 1265 m61,62). The site is close to Isunguata Sermia (labeled IS S5 in Fig. 1). Left: photo taken on 18 July 2019 when the fracture was observed to open with the onset of moulin formation and active stream interception. Right: photo taken on 25 July 2019, when the moulin had fully developed, and captured all supraglacial river discharge in an act of rapid glaciofluvial piracy. Red dashes show the approximate orientation of the surface fractures. Although this specific case is for a channel larger than the maximum considered in our model experiments, it nevertheless demonstrates that full depth hydrofracture is possible from supraglacial stream interception even through thick ( > 1200 m) ice - consistent with a tendency towards increasing likelihood as channel radius rc increases in Fig. 4. The rate of development also demonstrates that enlargement of the fracture below the stream by viscous heat dissipation - as considered in our ’fast’ model - is a potent process that rapidly accelerates stream capture.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Fracture zone and moulin development at Leverett Catchment site L41 (ice thickness ~ 800 to 900 m).
The site is close to Isunguata Sermia (labeled IS S5 in Fig. 1). Here a period of audible fracturing commenced on 3 June 2012, associated with seasonal ice flow acceleration as described by Chandler et al.13. Left: The fracture zone developed on 3 June and extended over 1 km across-flow. Photo taken 23 June 2012; auger is ~ 1 m tall. Right: Moulin L41A, which developed on the same fracture zone. Photo taken 13 June 2012, approximately 10 days after fracturing. Diurnal variations in stream discharge were typically 3 to 8 m3 s−113.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Stream capture and moulin development close to the margin in the Leverett catchment (ice thickness ~ 400 m).
Here stream capture lead to the development of moulin L7 used for tracing experiments in 201112. The photo was taken 8 June 2011, one day after the fracture opened. The hose width is approximately 25 mm.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Schematic showing how water leakage is calculated in Eqs. (6) to (8).
The total leak q from the channel into the fracture is treated as the sum of many small leaks δq (Eq. (7)). Each small leak is calculated using Toricelli’s equation (Eq. (6)); these are integrated around the curved perimeter of the channel cross section from ϕ = 0 to ϕ = π (Eq. (8)). In the ’slow’ model, the fracture width wfc just below the channel is fixed at a constant wfc = wf (as shown in Fig. 2). In the ’fast’ model, wfc increases with time close to the channel because turbulent heat transfer melts the ice where water is entering the fracture (see Eq. (13)), but remains fixed at wf elsewhere. Additional symbols are the parameter C in Toricelli’s equation, water depth h(ϕ), and channel radius rc.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Temporal evolution of fracture propagation and ice accretion.
This is the same as Fig. 3, except that diurnal changes in channel water level are included. The lower edge of the shading shows the fracture depth, and the water level is shown by the grey solid line. Shading indicates the thickness of ice accretion on to the fracture walls (Eq. (9)), with stippling and hatching indicating where total ice accretion is sufficient to close fractures of width 1 or 3 cm, respectively, before they reach the bed. These examples used Lf = 250 m, rc = 1.0 m based on observations in SW Greenland13, and the measured borehole temperature profiles shown in Fig. 1. Note that propagation rate is independent of fracture width wf (see Methods). The main changes from Fig. 3 are the longer propagation times, which allow thicker ice accretion and a more restricted range of conditions for full-depth hydrofracture.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Maximum ice accretion thickness in fractures propagating to the bed.
This is the same as Fig. 4, except that diurnal changes in channel water level are included. Maximum ice accretion is an indication of the minimum fracture width needed to enable full-depth hydrofracture propagation; thinner fractures will terminate before reaching the bed. Shading indicates the thickness of ice accretion (Eq. (9)), with stippling and hatching indicating where total ice accretion is sufficient to close fractures of width of 1 or 3 cm, respectively. These examples used the measured borehole temperature profiles shown in Fig. 1.
Extended Data Fig. 7 Theoretical estimates of fracture widths.
(a) Fracture width profiles calculated following Krawczynski et al.32 (Eq. (10)) for partially-filled fractures that have propagated to zd = 800 m. This shows how predicted fracture widths are very sensitive to water level za; it also shows the development of the constriction in the upper part of the fracture, once water level starts to drop below the surface (za/zd just above zero), which prevents us applying their model to partially-filled fractures in our study. Qualitatively similar profiles are found for other reasonable values of zd and \(\sigma {{\prime} }_{x}\). (b) Estimates of fracture widths at the surface, for completely water-filled fractures, again following Krawczynski et al.32 (Eq. (10); blue lines). For comparison, the black line represents the observed ~ 2 cm-wide fractures considered in this study (grey shaded range 1 to 3 cm). Calculations used plausible tensile far-field deviatoric stresses of 50, 100 and 200 kPa (dashes, solid, dotted lines, respectively). Although such wide surface fractures are observed following lake drainage events1,2 they are well beyond the range of widths that we have observed to be associated with supraglacial stream capture.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chandler, D.M., Hubbard, A. Widespread partial-depth hydrofractures in ice sheets driven by supraglacial streams. Nat. Geosci. 16, 605–611 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01208-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01208-0