Correction to: Neuropsychopharmacology https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-019-0434-4, published online 11 June 2019

The original version of this Article was updated shortly after publication to correct all references of numbers (such as 2167, 2168, 2165, 2162 etc.) as seen in Table 1 so as to include a comma after the 2. The comma was placed there to indicate two separate groups of numbers, 2 and 168 etc., rather than indicating a large number.

Below are the exact locations of the changes needed, and the numbers listed in red text need a comma after the “2” to indicate two separate groups of numbers rather than a large number:

Table 1—all 4-digit numbers within the ‘df' column

Under the Results section—Accuracy (calculated as d’) did not differ between groups (F(2167) = 1.603, p = .204). For median reaction time (RT), main effects of condition (F(2167) = 5.962, p = .003; WM > Control trials), and group (F(2167) = 141.431, p < .001) were detected.. The group x condition interaction was not significant (F(2167) = 0.135, p = .874).

Encoding. A one-way ANOVA revealed significant group effects in the FEF (F(2168) = 8.160, p < .001), SPL (F(2168) = 12.088, p < .001) and IPS (F(2168) = 8.758, p < .001)

During the late delay period, the FEF and IPS showed significant differences between groups (F(2168) = 10.721, p < .001 and F(2168) = 6.721

Legend for Figure 1—There was a significant difference in reaction time for both WM (F(2168) = 3.55, p < .05) and CTL conditions (F(2168) = 5.01, p < .01).

This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.