Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Charge-transfer dynamics and nonlocal dielectric permittivity tuned with metamaterial structures as solvent analogues

Abstract

Charge transfer (CT) is a fundamental and ubiquitous mechanism in biology, physics and chemistry. Here, we evidence that CT dynamics can be altered by multi-layered hyperbolic metamaterial (HMM) substrates. Taking triphenylene:perylene diimide dyad supramolecular self-assemblies as a model system, we reveal longer-lived CT states in the presence of HMM structures, with both charge separation and recombination characteristic times increased by factors of 2.4 and 1.7—that is, relative variations of 140 and 73%, respectively. To rationalize these experimental results in terms of driving force, we successfully introduce image dipole interactions in Marcus theory. The non-local effect herein demonstrated is directly linked to the number of metal–dielectric pairs, can be formalized in the dielectric permittivity, and is presented as a solid analogue to local solvent polarity effects. This model and extra PH3T:PC60BM results show the generality of this non-local phenomenon and that a wide range of kinetic tailoring opportunities can arise from substrate engineering. This work paves the way toward the design of artificial substrates to control CT dynamics of interest for applications in optoelectronics and chemistry.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: System under investigation.
Figure 2: Transient absorption measurements of annealed dyad molecule thin films.
Figure 3: Quantitative TA analysis.
Figure 4: Calculated non-local dielectric permittivity manipulated by HMM image dipole interactions.
Figure 5: Modelling and schematics.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marcus, R. A. Electron transfer reations in chemistry. Theory and experiment. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 599–610 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Marcus, R. A. Electron transfer theory and its inception. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 13729–13730 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Perrin, M. L. et al. Large tunable image-charge effects in single-molecule junctions. Nat. Nanotech. 8, 282–287 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jailaubekov, A. E. et al. Hot charge-transfer excitons set the time limit for charge separation at donor/acceptor interfaces in organic photovoltaics. Nat. Mater. 12, 66–73 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lunkenheimer, P. et al. Multiferroicity in an organic charge-transfer salt that is suggestive of electric-dipole-driven magnetism. Nat. Mater. 11, 755–758 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lambert, N. et al. Quantum biology. Nat. Phys. 9, 10–18 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Canaguier-Durand, A. et al. Thermodynamics of molecules strongly coupled to the vacuum field. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 10533–10536 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clavero, C. Plasmon-induced hot-electron generation at nanoparticle/metal-oxide interfaces for photovoltaic and photocatalytic devices. Nat. Photon. 8, 95–103 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kavarnos, G. J. & Turro, N. J. Photosensitization by reversible electron transfer: theories, experimental evidence, and examples. Chem. Rev. 86, 401–449 (1986).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Oevering, H. et al. Long-range photoinduced through-bond electron transfer and radiative recombination via rigid nonconjugated bridges: distance and solvent dependence. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 3258–3269 (1987).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosspeintner, A. & Vauthey, E. Bimolecular photoinduced electron transfer reactions in liquids under the gaze of ultrafast spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 25741–25754 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Coropceanu, V. et al. Charge transport in organic semiconductors. Chem. Rev. 107, 926–952 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sokolov, A. N. et al. From computational discovery to experimental characterization of a high hole mobility organic crystal. Nat. Commun. 2, 437–445 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ribierre, J. C. et al. Hybrid organic-inorganic liquid bistable memory devices. Org. Electron. 12, 1800–1805 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gorczak, N. et al. Different mechanisms for hole and electron transfer along identical molecular bridges: the importance of the initial state delocalization. J. Phys. Chem. A 118, 3891–3898 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dimitrov, S. D. & Durrant, J. R. Materials design considerations for charge generation in organic solar cells. Chem. Mater. 26, 616–630 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, R. H. et al. Non-volatile organic memory with sub-millimetre bending radius. Nat. Commun. 5, 3583–3595 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Muhieddine, K. et al. All solution-processed, hybrid light emitting field-effect transistors. Adv. Mater. 26, 6410–6415 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. La, O. V. C. et al. Elucidating the role of disorder and free-carrier recombination kinetics in CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite films. Nat. Commun. 6, 7903–7910 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hirata, S. et al. Highly efficient blue electroluminescence based on thermally activated delayed fluorescence. Nat. Mater. 14, 330–336 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Howells, C. T. et al. Enhanced organic solar cells efficiency through electronic and electro-optic effects resulting from charge transfers in polymer hole transport blends. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 4252–4263 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Orgiu, E. et al. Conductivity in organic semiconductors hybridized with the vacuum field. Nat. Mater. 14, 1123–1129 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hutchison, J. A. et al. Modifying chemical landscapes by coupling to vacuum fields. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 1592–1596 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Feist, J. & Garcia-Vidal, F. J. Extraordinary exciton conductance induced by strong coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 196402 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dai, S. et al. Graphene on hexagonal boron nitride as a tunable hyperbolic metamaterial. Nat. Nanotech. 10, 682–686 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Krishnamoorthy, H. N. et al. Topological transitions in metamaterials. Science 336, 205–209 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Poddubny, A. et al. Hyperbolic metamaterials. Nat. Photon. 7, 948–957 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kildishev, A. V. et al. Planar photonics with metasurfaces. Science 339, 1232009 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhukovsky, S. V. et al. Physical nature of volume plasmon polaritons in hyperbolic metamaterials. Opt. Express 21, 14982–14987 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lu, D. & Liu, Z. Hyperlenses and metalenses for far-field super-resolution imaging. Nat. Commun. 3, 1205–1214 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hunt, J. et al. Metamaterial apertures for computational imaging. Science 339, 310–313 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Shitrit, N. et al. Spin-optical metamaterial route to spin-controlled photonics. Science 340, 724–726 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee, Y. U. & Wu, J. W. Control of optical spin Hall shift in phase-discontinuity metasurface by weak value measurement post-selection. Sci. Rep. 5, 13900 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kauranen, M. & Zayats, A. V. Nonlinear plasmonics. Nat. Photon. 6, 737–748 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zheng, G. et al. Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency. Nat. Nanotech. 10, 308–312 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sondergaard, T. et al. Plasmonic black gold by adiabatic nanofocusing and absorption of light in ultra-sharp convex grooves. Nat. Commun. 3, 969 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hu, H. et al. Rainbow trapping in hyperbolic metamaterial waveguide. Sci. Rep. 3, 1249 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Esfandyarpour, M. et al. Metamaterial mirrors in optoelectronic devices. Nat. Nanotech. 9, 542–547 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ni, X. et al. Effect of metallic and hyperbolic metamaterial surfaces on electric and magnetic dipole emission transitions. Appl. Phys. B 103, 553–558 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Noginova, N. et al. Modification of electric and magnetic dipole emission in anisotropic plasmonic systems. Opt. Express 21, 23087–23096 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Noginov, M. A. et al. Controlling spontaneous emission with metamaterials. Opt. Lett. 35, 1863–1865 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tumkur, T. et al. Control of spontaneous emission in a volume of functionalized hyperbolic metamaterial. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 151115 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kim, J. et al. Improving the radiative decay rate for dye molecules with hyperbolic metamaterials. Opt. Express 20, 8100–8116 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lu, D. et al. Enhancing spontaneous emission rates of molecules using nanopatterned multilayer hyperbolic metamaterials. Nat. Nanotech. 9, 48–53 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Peters, V. N. et al. Control of a chemical reaction (photodegradation of the p3ht polymer) with nonlocal dielectric environments. Sci. Rep. 5, 14620 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Cortes, C. L. et al. Quantum nanophotonics using hyperbolic metamaterials. J. Opt. 14, 063001 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schilling, J. Uniaxial metallo-dielectric metamaterials with scalar positive permeability. Phys. Rev. E 74, 046618 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Elemans, J. A. A. W. et al. Molecular materials by self-assembly of porphyrins, phthalocyanines, and perylenes. Adv. Mater. 18, 1251–1266 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Hayashi, H. et al. Segregated donor-acceptor columns in liquid crystals that exhibit highly efficient ambipolar charge transport. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 10736–10739 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Schwartz, P. O. et al. Perylenediimide-based donor-acceptor dyads and triads: impact of molecular architecture on self-assembling properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 5981–5992 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Squillaci, M. A. et al. Self-assembly of an amphiphilic pi-conjugated dyad into fibers: ultrafast and ultrasensitive humidity sensor. Adv. Mater. 27, 3170–3174 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhao, K. Q. et al. Highly segregated lamello-columnar mesophase organizations and fast charge carrier mobility in new discotic donor-acceptor triads. Chem. Eur. J. A 21, 10379–10390 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Xiao, Y. et al. Chemical engineering of donor-acceptor liquid crystalline dyads and triads for the controlled nanostructuration of organic semiconductors. CrystEngComm. 18, 4787–4798 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Lee, K. J. et al. Structure–charge transfer property relationship in self-assembled discotic liquid-crystalline donor–acceptor dyad and triad thin films. RSC Adv. 6, 57811–57819 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhu, X. Y. How to draw energy level diagrams in excitonic solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 2283–2288 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Chen, L. X. et al. Dynamics of photoinduced electron transfer in a molecular donor-acceptor quartet. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 11730–11738 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Roland, T. et al. Sub-100 fs charge transfer in a novel donor-acceptor-donor triad organized in a smectic film. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 273–279 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Sartin, M. M. et al. Nonlinear optical pulse suppression via ultrafast photoinduced electron transfer in an aggregated perylene diimide/oligothiophene molecular triad. J. Phys. Chem. A 118, 110–121 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been carried out in the framework of CNRS International Associated Laboratory ‘Functional nanostructures: morphology, nanoelectronics and ultrafast optics’ (LIA NANOFUNC). K.J.L., Y.X., J.H.W., E.K., J.-C.R., J.W.W. and P.A. were supported by funding of the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Korea (201000453, 2015001948, 2014M3A6B3063706). P.A. would like to thank the Canon Foundation in Europe for supporting his Fellowship. The authors also acknowledge the International Research Network (GDRI, CNRS) on ‘Functional Materials for Organic Optics, Electronics and Devices’ (FUNMOOD). The authors are also grateful to J.-Y. Bigot, M. Vomir, M. Barthelemy and O. Cregut for their contributions in setting up and optimizing the femtosecond pump–probe set-up used in this study. The authors thank Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (PAL) in South Korea for giving us the opportunity to perform the GIXS measurements in the frame of the proposal number ‘2014-1st-9A-015’. The authors are grateful to MEST and POSTECH for supporting the GIXS experiments, to T. J. Shin and H. Ahn as well as other staff members from 9A U-SAXS beamline for assistance with adjustments and help. B. Heinrich is warmly acknowledged for his contributions to the GIXS measurements and data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.J.L., J.-C.R., J.W.W. and P.A. designed the experiments; Y.X. synthesized the dyad molecules under the supervision of F.M., D.K. and A.-J.A.; Y.X., BH and F.M. completed the GIXS measurements. K.J.L. completed the transient measurements and analysis with some assistance from J.H.W. and E.K., and with feedback from P.A.; K.J.L., J.W.W. and P.A. developed the model used to describe the system and discussed the results. K.J.L. completed all the numerical calculations. K.J.L. and P.A. prepared the figures. P.A. wrote the manuscript and Supplementary Information, except the GIXS and dyad preparation. K.J.L., J.-C.R., J.W.W. and P.A. replied to the reviewer comments and altered the manuscript accordingly. All the authors commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jean-Charles Ribierre, Jeong Weon Wu or Pascal André.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 1537 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, K., Xiao, Y., Woo, J. et al. Charge-transfer dynamics and nonlocal dielectric permittivity tuned with metamaterial structures as solvent analogues. Nature Mater 16, 722–729 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4907

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4907

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing