Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Is the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) effective for preterm infants with intrauterine growth restriction?

Abstract

Objective:

This study investigates the effectiveness of the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) on neurobehavioral and electrophysiological functioning of preterm infants with severe intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR).

Study Design:

Thirty IUGR infants, 28 to 33 weeks gestational age, randomized to standard care (control/C=18), or NIDCAP (experimental/E=12), were assessed at 2 weeks corrected age (2wCA) and 9 months corrected age (9mCA) in regard to health, anthropometrics, and neurobehavior, and additionally at 2wCA in regard to electrophysiology (EEG).

Result:

The two groups were comparable in health and anthropometrics at 2wCA and 9mCA. The E-group at 2wCA showed significantly better autonomic, motor, and self-regulation functioning, improved motility, intensity and response thresholds, and reduced EEG connectivity among several adjacent brain regions. At 9mCA, the E-group showed significantly better mental performance.

Conclusion:

This is the first study to show NIDCAP effectiveness for IUGR preterm infants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin J, Hamilton B, Sutton P . Births: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2007; 56: 1–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Behrman RE, Stith Butler A . Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention. The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Als H . Program Guide—Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP): An Education and Training Program for Health Care Professionals. Unpublished Manuscript. Boston: Copyright, NIDCAP Federation International 1986 rev 2009.

  4. Maguire CM, Walther FJ, van Zwieten PHT, Le Cessie S, Wit JM, Veen S et al. Follow-up outcomes at 1 and 2 years of infants born less than 32 weeks after Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program. Pediatrics 2009; 123: 1081–1087.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Als H, Lawhon G, Duffy FH, McAnulty GB, Gibes-Grossman R, Blickman JG . Individualized developmental care for the very low birthweight preterm infant: medical and neurofunctional effects. JAMA 1994; 272: 853–858.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fleisher BF, VandenBerg KA, Constantinou J, Heller C, Benitz WE, Johnson A et al. Individualized developmental care for very-low-birth-weight premature infants. Clin Pediatr 1995; 34: 523–529.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Westrup B, Kleberg A, von Eichwald K, Stjernqvist K, Lagercrantz H . A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program in a Swedish setting. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 66–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kleberg A, Westrup B, Stjernqvist K, Lagercrantz H . Indications of improved cognitive development at one year of age among infants born very prematurely who received care based on the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP). Early Hum Dev 2002; 68: 83–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Als H, Gilkerson L, Duffy FH, McAnulty GB, Buehler DM, VandenBerg KA et al. A three-center randomized controlled trial of individualized developmental care for very low birth weight preterm infants: medical, neurodevelopmental, parenting and caregiving effects. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2003; 24: 399–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Buehler DM, Als H, Duffy FH, McAnulty GB, Liederman J . Effectiveness of individualized developmental care for low-risk preterm infants: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Pediatrics 1995; 96: 923–932.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Als H . Individualized developmental care for preterm infants. Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development. Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development Website, 2004, pp http://www.excellence-earlychildhood.ca/liste_theme.asp.

  12. Peters K, Rosychuk R, Hendson L, Cote J, McPherson C, Tyebkhan J . Improvement of short- and long-term outcomes for very low birth weight infants: the Edmonton NIDCAP trial. Pediatrics 2009; 124: 1009–1020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ballard JL . A simplified assessment of gestational age. Pediatr Res 1977; 11: 374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gairdner D, Pearson J . A growth chart for premature and other infants. Arch Dis Child 1971; 46: 783–787.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Als H . Manual for the naturalistic observation of the newborn (preterm and fullterm). Unpublished manuscript. Boston: Children's Hospital; 1981, rev. 1995. Report No.: 3rd revision.

  16. Als H . Toward a synactive theory of development: promise for the assessment of infant individuality. Inf Mental Health J 1982; 3: 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Als H . Reading the premature infant. In: Goldson E (ed). Developmental Interventions in the Neonatal Intensive Care Nursery. Oxford University Press: New York, 1999, pp 18–85.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Als H, Duffy F, McAnulty GB, Rivkin MJ, Vajapeyam S, Mulkern RV et al. Early experience alters brain function and structure. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 846–857.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Als H, Lester BM, Tronick EZ, Brazelton TB . Manual for the assessment of preterm infants' behavior (APIB). In: Fitzgerald HE, Lester BM, Yogman MW (eds). Theory and Research in Behavioral Pediatrics. vol. 1. Plenum Press: New York, 1982, pp 65–132.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Duffy FH, Als H, McAnulty GB . Infant EEG spectral coherence data during quiet sleep: unrestricted principal components analysis—relation of factors to gestational age, medical risk, and neurobehavioral status. Clin Electroencephalogr 2003; 34: 54–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Prechtl H, Beintema D . The Neurological Examination of the Full-Term Newborn Infant; A Manual for Clinical Use. Spastics Society Medical Education and Information Unit: London, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nunez PL, Pilgreen KL . The spline-Laplacian in clinical neurophysiology: a method to improve EEG spatial resolution. J Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 8: 397–413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bayley N . Bayley Scales of Infant Development, 2nd edn. The Psychological Corporation: San Antonio, Texas, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dixon WJ . BMDP Statistical Software Manual. University of California Press: Berkeley, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rao CR . Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometric Research. Hafner Press: New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lachenbruch PA . Discriminant Analysis. Hafner Press: New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lachenbruch P, Mickey RM . Estimation of error rates in discriminant analysis. Technometrics 1968; 10: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cooley WW, Lohnes PR . Multivariate Data Analysis. J. Wiley and Sons: New York, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Prechtl HFR . The Neurological Examination of the Full-term Infant: A Manual for Clinical Use, 2nd edn. Lippincott: Philadelphia, 1977 68pp.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Anand KJS, Scalzo FM . Can adverse neonatal experiences alter brain development and subsequent behavior? Biol Neonat 2000; 77: 69–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Limperopoulos C, Gauvreau K, O'Leary H, Moore M, Bassan H, Eichenwald E et al. Cerebral hemodynamic changes during intensive care of preterm infants. Pediatrics 2008; 122: 1006–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hüppi PS, Zimine S, Borradori-Tolsa C, Lazeyras F . Microstructural changes in brain development in premature infants with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR): a voxel-based analysis of diffusion tensor imaging. Pediatr Res 2004; 55: 582A (3303).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sizonenko S, Borradori-Tolsa C, Vauthay D, Lodygensky G, Lazeyras F, Huppi P . Impact of intrauterine growth restriction and glucocorticoids on brain development: insights using advanced magnetic resonance imaging. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2006; 254–255: 163–171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sizonenko SV, Borradori-Tolsa C, Hüppi PS . Intrauterine growth restriction: impact on brain development and function. Rev Med Suisse 2008; 4: 509–514.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. The changing concept of sudden infant death syndrome: diagnostic coding shifts, controversies regarding the sleeping environment, and new variables to consider in reducing risk Policy Statement. Pediatrics 2005; 1245–1255.

  36. Hedlund R, Tatarka M . The Infant Behavioral Assessment Training Manual. Washington Research Institute: Seattle, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Koldewijn K, Wolf M, van Wassenaer A, Beelen A, de Groot I, Hedlund R . The infant behavioral assessment and intervention program to support preterm infants after hospital discharge: a pilot study. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005; 47: 105–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Koldewijn K, van Hus J, van Wassenaer A, Jeukens M, Kok J, Nollet F et al. A neurobehavioral intervention and assessment program in very low birth weight infants: outcome at 24 months. J Pediatr 2010; 156 (3): 359–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr J Connolly, REEGT for expert EEG data acquisition; Ms M Cummings, RN, MSN, Nurse Manager and Ms Mazzawi, RN MSN, Assistant Nurse Manager, BWH NICU for their unflagging confidence in their staff; the nurses and neonatologists for their support of the study; and the families and infants for their participation and commitment. The study was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant RO1HD3826, US Department of Education grants HO23C970032; R305T990294 and an Irving Harris Foundation grant to H. Als; as well as NIH grant P30HD18655 to S. Pomeroy. The study is registered as a clinical trial. The trial registration number is NCT00914108.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H Als.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Journal of Perinatology website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Als, H., Duffy, F., McAnulty, G. et al. Is the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) effective for preterm infants with intrauterine growth restriction?. J Perinatol 31, 130–136 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2010.81

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2010.81

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links