Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Inequality in mutation rates of the two strands of DNA

Abstract

As the mechanisms for replicating the two strands of duplex DNA differ1 it is, in principle, possible for the mutation rates to differ depending on which strand is being copied. In the absence of selection this would lead to a difference in the measured rate of a particular base substitution, such as T to C, depending on which DNA strand was analysed to determine the rate. Thus a change such as T to C on one DNA strand results from either a direct T-to-C mutation on that strand or an A-to-G mutation on the complementary strand; for the other strand the situation is reversed, and it can be seen that different processes are responsible for the two cases, allowing for asymmetry in substitution rate. We have tested whether such asymmetry indeed occurs by studying equivalent sequences from the β-globin complexes of six species of primate. Our results reveal an asymmetry in substitution rates consistent with predictions based on strand-inequalities in mutation rates. Our sequence comparisons also allow us to make predictions about the positions of replication origins and the replication error rates of one strand relative to the other.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 1. Lewin, B. Genes (Wiley, New York, 1985). 2. Razin, A. & Riggs, A. D. Science 210, 604–610 (1980). 3. Koop, B. F., Goodman, M., Xu, P., Chan, K. & Slightom, J. L. Nature 319,234–238 (1986). 4. Maeda, N., Bliska, J. B. & Smithies, O. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 5012–5016 (1983). 5. Maeda, N., Wu, C. I., Bliska, J. B. & Reneke, J. Molec. Biol. Evol (submitted). 6. Fitch, W. M. Syst. ZooL 20, 406–416 (1971). 7. Gojobori, T., Li, W. H. & Graur, D. / molec. Evol. 18, 360–369 (1982). 8. Lu, W. H., Wu, C. I. & Luo, C. C. /. molec. Evol. 21, 58–71 (1984). 9. Tajima, F. & Nei, M. /. molec. Evol 18, 115–120 (1982). 10. Topal, M. D. & Fresco, J. R. Nature 263, 285–293 (1976). 11. Fersht, A. R. & Knill–Jones, J. W. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 4251–4255 (1981).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, CI., Maeda, N. Inequality in mutation rates of the two strands of DNA. Nature 327, 169–170 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/327169a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/327169a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing