Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Specificity of T-cell clones illustrates altered self hypothesis

Abstract

Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) recognize foreign antigens in the context of self major histocompatibility antigens. In the mouse this phenomenon is called H–2 restriction as H–2 is the major histocompatibility complex. Two theories have been proposed to explain the dual requirement for CTLs to kill specifically target cells: (1) the two-receptor hypothesis proposes that T cells have an anti-self H–2 receptor and a distinct anti-foreign (anti-X) receptor1,2; (2) the altered self hypothesis proposes that T cells recognize complex antigens or interaction antigens created by the physical interaction of self H–2 molecules and X in the target cell membrane3,4. Here we report the isolation of CTL clones which recognize H–2k-plus-X and cross-react with H–2d-plus-Y. Because the clones recognize two pairs of antigens and not any combination, for example, H–2k-plus-Y, they support very strongly the principle of altered self recognition, that is, that only the complex of H–2 and foreign antigen is recognized and not either component independently.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Katz, D. H., Hamaoka, T. & Benacerraf, B. J. exp. Med. 137, 1405–1418 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenthal, A. S. & Shevach, E. M. J. exp. Med. 138, 1194–1212 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Zinkernagel, R. M. & Doherty, P. C. Nature 251, 547–548 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Doherty, P. C., Blanden, R. V. & Zinkernagel, R. M. Transplantn Rev. 29, 89–124 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bevan, M. J. Nature 269, 417–418 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fink, P. J. & Bevan, M. J. J. exp. Med. 148, 766–775 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zinkernagel, R. M. et al. J. exp. Med. 147, 897–911 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bailey, D. W. Immunogenetics 2, 249–256 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Snell, G. D., Dausset, J. & Nathenson, S. Histocompatibility, 401 (Academic, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schmitt-Verhulst, A.-M., Pettinelli, C. B., Henkart, P. A., Lunney, J. K. & Shearer, G. M. J. exp. Med. 147, 352–367 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ballas, Z. K. & Henney, C. S. J. Immun. 123, 1696–1704 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hunig, T. & Bevan, M. J. (in preparation).

  13. Bevan, M. J. & Fink, P. J. Immun. Rev. 42, 3–19 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kappler, J. W., Skidmore, B., White, J. & Marrack, P. J. exp. Med. 153, 1198–1214 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Raulet, D. H., Gottlieb, P. D. & Bevan, M. J. J. Immun. 125, 1136–1143 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Glasebrook, A. L. & Fitch, F. W. J. exp. Med. 151, 876–894 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hünig, T., Bevan, M. Specificity of T-cell clones illustrates altered self hypothesis. Nature 294, 460–462 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/294460a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/294460a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing