Abstract
Fisher1 produced the first general argument that a random-mating sexually-reproducing population should devote equal reproductive resources to the production of male and female offspring, while Hamilton2 considered several unusual situations in which the expenditure of reproductive resources should be biased towards one sex or the other. His ‘host’ model has been widely cited3–6 and at least three factors proposed as the cause of the sex ratio bias: local mate competition, sib-mating and inbreeding. The problem of which of these factors is the real cause of the biased sex ratio seems important in view of the large number of apparently different but often closely related sex ratio models which are now being proposed. It would be useful to have ways of classifying them according to the presence of different factors which affect the equilibrium sex ratio. Here, I present a general equation (equation (2)) for differential change in fitness which exhibits the equilibrium sex ratio as achieving a balance between the factor contained in Fisher's standard grandchild argument1 and a second factor resulting from intra-sex sibling interactions over reproductive resources. In particular, I analyse Hamilton's host model2 for the presence of these different factors.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Oxford University Press, 1929).
Hamilton, W. D. Science 156, 477–488 (1967).
Trivers, R. L. & Hare, H. Science 191, 249–263 (1976).
Stenseth, N. C. Oikos 30, 83–89 (1978).
Maynard Smith, J. The Evolution of Sex (Cambridge University Press, 1978).
Taylor, P. D. & Bulmer, M. G. J. theor. Biol. 86, 409–419 (1980).
Clark, A. B. Science 201, 163–165 (1978).
MacDonald, D. W. Nature 282, 69–71 (1979).
Emlen, S. T. in Behavioural Ecology (eds Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.) 245–281 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1978).
Bertram, B. C. R. in Behavioural Ecology (eds Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.) 64–96 (Blackwell, Oxford (1978).
Pickering, J. Nature 283, 291–292 (1980).
Benford, F. A. J. theor. Biol. 72, 701–727 (1978).
Bulmer, M. G. & Taylor, P. D. Heredity (in the press).
Charnov, E. L. Mar. Biol. Lett. 1, 269–272 (1980).
Fischer, E. A. Am. Nat. 17, 64–82 (1981).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor, P. Intra-sex and inter-sex sibling interactions as sex ratio determinants. Nature 291, 64–66 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/291064a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/291064a0
This article is cited by
-
Pollinating fig wasps’ simple solutions to complex sex ratio problems: a review
Frontiers in Zoology (2022)
-
Mating behavior and reproductive morphology predict macroevolution of sex allocation in hermaphroditic flatworms
BMC Biology (2022)
-
Caste development and sex ratio of the Ryukyu drywood termite Neotermes sugioi and its potential mechanisms
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Development of microsatellite markers and estimation of inbreeding frequency in the parasitoid wasp Melittobia
Scientific Reports (2017)
-
Effects of biotic and abiotic factors on phenotypic partitioning of wing morphology and development in Sclerodermus pupariae (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae)
Scientific Reports (2016)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.