Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Resorbing bone is chemotactic for monocytes

Abstract

MONOCYTES are often found adjacent to bone-resorbing surfaces. Their function at these sites is unknown, although they have been shown in vitro to have the ability to resorb bone1,2. There is also strong circumstantial evidence that circulating monocytes are precursors for the major bone-resorbing cell, the osteoclast3–7. The mechanism by which circulating monocytes are attracted to sites of bone remodelling are unknown. We have examined the products of resorbing bone for chemotactic effects on circulating human monocytes and found that organ cultures of resorbing fetal rat long bones produced factors which were chemotactic for human peripheral blood monocytes, but not for neutrophils or lymphocytes. The chemotactic effect of resorbing bones occurred independent of the humoral mediator of bone resorption. The mechanisms by which monocytes are attracted to bone surfaces may be of fundamental importance to our understanding of bone cell dynamics and bone resorption.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mundy, G. R., Altman, A. J., Gondek, M. D. & Bandelin, J. G. Science 196, 1109–1111 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kahn, A. J., Stewart, C. C. & Tietelbaum, S. L. Science 199, 988–990 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fischman, D. A. & Hay, E. D. Anat. Rec. 143, 329–334 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jee, W. S. S. & Nolan, T. D. Nature 200, 225–227 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Walker, D. G. Endocrinology 91, 916 (1972); Science 190, 784–785; 785–786 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gothlin, G. & Ericsson, J. L. E. Virchows Arch B. 12, 318–329 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Buring, K. Clin. Orthopaed. Rel. Res. 110, 293–302 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Raisz, L. G. J. clin Invest. 44, 103–116 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Trummel, C. L., Mundy, G. R. & Raisz, L. G. J. Lab. clin. Med. 85, 1001–1007 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ward, P. A., Cochrane, C. G. & Müller-Eberhard, H. J. J. exp. Med. 122, 327–346 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson, R. D., Simmons, R. L. & Quie, P. D. in In Vitro Methods in Cell-Mediated and Tumor Immunity (eds Bloom, B. R. & David, J. R.) 663 (Academic, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Postlewaite, A. E. & Kang, A. H. J. exp. Med. 143, 1299–1307 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohn, Z. A. & Morse, S. I. J. exp. Med. 110, 419–443 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MUNDY, G., VARANI, J., ORR, W. et al. Resorbing bone is chemotactic for monocytes. Nature 275, 132–135 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/275132a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/275132a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing