Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Rhodopsin content and electroretinographic sensitivity in light-damaged rat retina

Abstract

EXPOSURE of rats to continuous illumination leads to cellular deterioration within the retina and a concurrent reduction of electroretinogram (ERG) responses1,2. Grignolo et al.3 showed that at early stages, this ‘damage’ due to light is hypertrophic in that tubules and vesciculae appear in receptor cell outer segments. They surmised that losses in retinal functioning are initially due to disorganisation rather than degeneration. But, experiments on recovery from light damage2 indicate that ERG sensitivity returns as the rhodopsin-containing disks of the outer segments are regenerated even though their original lamellar structure is not restored. It is thereby implied that as long as visual pigment is present at functional sites, the normal structure of the outer segments may not be crucial to ERG responsivity. Here we describe an experiment which quantitatively examines the role of visual pigment remaining in the albino rat retina which has been exposed to continuous low-intensity light. The ERG sensitivity, rhodopsin content and morphological state of the retina were assessed for various exposure durations. Our findings indicate that reductions in visual pigment levels due to constant light persist indefinitely in the dark. Furthermore, the log ERG (b wave) sensitivity varied directly with the rhodopsin content of exposed retinas even as progressive deterioration was apparent. With respect to this log–lienar relationship, light damage resembles ‘normal’ light adaptation due to short term bleaching exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Noell, W. K., Walker, V. S., Kang, B. S. & Berman, S., Invest. Ophthalmol. 5, 450–473 (1966).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuwabara, T., Am. J. Opthamol. 70, 187–198 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grignolo, A., Orzalesi, N., Castellazzo, R. & Vittone, P., Ophthalmologica 157, 43–49 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuwabara, T. & Gorn, R. A., Arch. Ophth. 79, 69–78 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dowling, J. E., J. gen. Physiol. 46, 1287–1301 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weinstein, G. W., Hobson, R. R. & Dowling, J. E., Nature 215, 134–138 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dowling, J. E. & Wald, G., Proc natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 46, 587–608 (1960).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller, R. F. & Dowling, J. E., J. Neurophysiol. 33, 323–341 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

RAPP, L., WILLIAMS, T. Rhodopsin content and electroretinographic sensitivity in light-damaged rat retina. Nature 267, 835–836 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/267835a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/267835a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing