Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Relationship between reward-enhancing and stereotypical effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs

Nature volume 264, pages 57–59 (1976)Cite this article

Abstract

BLEULER has described stereotyped behaviour as “one of the most striking external manifestations of schizophrenia”1. Schizophrenic stereotyped behaviour has been found in the spheres of movement, action, posture, speech, writing, thought aid desire1. Abuse of the psychomotor stimulant drugs, such as the amphetamines, methylphenidate, cocaine and pipradrol, can cause a psychosis which is clinically indistinguishable from paranoid schizophrenia2, and which contains stereotyped components2,3. In animals, acute doses of the stimulants can induce stereotyped behaviour which is apparently under minimal situational control, and which can disrupt normal activity4. In contrast, low doses of the stimulants can apparently improve learning and performance in a variety of situations, in both animals5 and man6. This paper demonstrates a relationship between these two apparently diverse actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bleuler, E., Dementia Praecox, 185–190 and 454–455 (International Universities, New York, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Snyder, S. H., Arch. gen. Psychiat., 27, 169–179 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rylander, G., in Correlation of Adverse Effects in Man with Observations in Animals (edit. by Baker, S.), 28–31 (Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Randrup, A., and Munkvad, I., J. psychiat. Res., 11, 1–10 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lyon, M., and Robbins, T. W., in Current Developments in Psychopharmacology, 2 (edit. by Essman, W., and Valzelli, L.), 79–163 (Spectrum, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weiss, B., and Laties, V. G., Pharmac. Rev., 14, 1–36 (1962).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stein, L., in Animal Behaviour and Drug Action (edit. by Steinberg, H., de Reuck, A. V. S., and Knight, J.), 91–118 (Churchill, London, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hill, R. T., in Amphetamine and Related Compounds (edit. by Costa, E., and Garattini, S.), 781–795 (Raven, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robbins, T. W., Psychopharmacologia, 45, 103–114 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Berlyne, D. E., in Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (edit. by Levine, D.), 1–110 (Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dews, P. B., J. Pharmac. exp. Ther., 122, 137–147 (1958).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mackintosh, N. J., The Psychology of Animal Learning (Academic, London, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Winer, B. J., Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 399 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kiernan, C. C., Psychopharmacologia, 8, 23–31 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Longstreth, L. E., in Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (edit. by Cole, J. K.), 38–80 (Univ. Nebraska, Lincoln, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ellinwood, E. H., Psychopharmacologia, 21, 131–138 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hutt, C., and Hutt, S. J., in Behaviour Studies in Psychiatry (edit. by Hutt, S. J., and Hutt, C.), 175–200 (Pergamon, Oxford, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Henderson, D., and Gillespie, R. D., Textbook of Psychiatry, tenth ed. (revised by Batchelor, I.R.C.), 277–278 (Oxford, London, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychological Laboratory, Downing St, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK

    T. W. ROBBINS

Authors
  1. T. W. ROBBINS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ROBBINS, T. Relationship between reward-enhancing and stereotypical effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs. Nature 264, 57–59 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/264057a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/264057a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing