Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Cytophotometric factors causing apparent differences between Feulgen DNA contents of different leukocyte types

Abstract

A CENTRAL issue in the study of both metazoan differentiation and the control of cellular activity is the validity or otherwise of the hypothesis1,2 that nonreplicating nuclei of a given higher organism contain a constant amount of DNA per haploid set of chromosomes. Differential elimination or increase of DNA has been demonstrated in dipteran polytene chromosomes3, and in the oocytes of Acheta and amphibia4, but apart from these possibly special cases the most studied apparent exception to the constancy rule is probably provided by mammalian leukocytes5–11. Most workers in this field have found the apparent DNA content of the relatively large nuclei of monocytes, as assessed by Feulgen cytophotometry, to be between 5% and 20% higher than that of the smaller, more darkly stained nuclei of lymphocytes and polymorphonuclear leukocytes. The consensus of opinion seems to be that the measured differences are probably due to nonstoichiometry of staining rather than to genuine differences in the amounts of DNA present. But work published to date has in general been performed without certain technical refinements which have recently become available, and we have now investigated the possibility that systematic cytophotometric errors may have been responsible for at least some of the reported differences between cell types.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boivin, A., Vendrely, R., and Vendrely, C., C.r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris, 226, 1061 (1948).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mirsky, A. E., and Ris, H., Nature, 163, 666 (1949).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rudkin, G. T., Genetics, Suppl. 61, 1 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lima-de-Faria, A., in Handbook of Molecular Cytology (edit. by Lima-de-Faria, A.), 277 (North-Holland, Amsterdam and London, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hale, A. J., J. Path. Bact., 85, 311 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Garcia, A. M., Acta Histochem., 17, 230 (1964).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Deitch, D. A., Wagner, D., and Richart, R. M., J. Histochem. Cytochem., 16, 371 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mayall, B. H., J. Histochem. Cytochem., 17, 249 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sullivan, P. A., and Garcia, M., Acta Cytol., 14, 104 (1970).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gottlieb-Rosenkrantz, P., and O'Brien, R., J. Histochem. Cytochem., 19, 232 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. James, J., Acta Cytol., 17, 15 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pearse, A. G. E., Histochemistry, (Churchill, London, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldstein, D. J., J. Microsc., 92, 1 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldstein, D. J., J. Microsc., 93, 15 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BEDI, K., GOLDSTEIN, D. Cytophotometric factors causing apparent differences between Feulgen DNA contents of different leukocyte types. Nature 251, 439–440 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1038/251439a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/251439a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing