Abstract
THE hypothesis of a laterality effect in dichotic listening (D-L) has been challenged by Oxbury, Oxbury and Gardiner1. The authors concluded that the right ear superiority may have been the result of an attentional bias toward the right ear when free recall methods are used. This argument is based on the following data. When different half-spans of digits are presented in simultaneous pairs to each ear through stereo headphones, and at rapid rates, Ss tend to recall the messages (under free recall) by an ear order of report rather than by a temporal order of report2. Furthermore, information presented to the ear reported first (perceptual channel) is more accurately recalled than information presented to the ear reported second (delayed or storage channel). If therefore Ss, under free recall, tend to report more often from the right ear first, an ear asymmetry in favour of the right ear would be expected because of the failure to control for a bias in the order in which messages are reported. This hypothesis also assumes that the right ear superiority should disappear when the order of report is controlled1,3.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Oxbury, S., Oxbury, J., and Gardiner, J., Nature, 214, 742 (1967).
Broadbent, D. E., J. Exp. Psychol., 47, 191 (1954).
Inglis, J., Acta Otolaryngol., Stockholm, 60, 231 (1965).
Bryden, M. P., Canad. J. Psychol., 16, 291 (1962).
Bryden, M. P., Acta Otolaryngol., 63, 595 (1967).
Kimura, D., Canad. J. Psychol., 16, 18 (1961).
Bartz, W., Satz, P., Fennell, E., and Lally, J. R., J. Exp. Psychol., 74, 132 (1967).
Bartz, W., Satz, P., and Fennell, E., Proc. Amer. Psychol. Assoc., 2, 17 (1966).
Bartz, W., Satz, P., and Fennell, E., J. Exp. Psychol., 73, 204 (1967).
Broadbent, D. E., and Gregory, M., Quart. J. Exp. Psychol., 16, 309 (1964).
Bryden, M. P., J. Exp. Psychol., 65, 103 (1963).
Cooper, A., Achenbach, K., Satz, P., and Levy, C. M., Psychon. Sci., 9, 97 (1967).
Satz, P., Achenbach, K., Pattishall, E., and Fennell, E., Cortex, 1, 377 (1965).
Borkowski, J., Spreen, O., and Stutz, J. Z., Psychon. Sci., 3, 547 (1965).
Satz, P., Achenbach, K., and Fennell, E., Neuropsychology, 5, 295 (1967).
Dirks, D., Acta Otolaryngol., Stockholm, 58, 73 (1964).
Palmer, R. D., J. Psychol., 58, 157 (1964).
Shaukweiler, D., and Studdert-Kennedy, M., Quart. J. Exp. Psychol., 19, 59 (1967).
Kimura, D., Quart. J. Exp. Psychol., 16, 355 (1964).
Shankweiler, D., J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 62, 115 (1966).
Roberts, L., in Handbook of Clinical Neurology (edit. by Vinken, P. J., and Bruyn, G. W.) (in the press).
Tunturi, A. R., Amer. J. Physiol., 147, 311 (1946).
Rosenzweig, M. R., Amer. J. Physiol., 167, 147 (1951).
Bocca, E., Calearo, C., Cassinari, V., and Migliavacca, F., Acta Otolaryngol., Stockholm, 45, 289 (1955).
Kimura, D., Canad. J. Psychol., 15, 166 (1961).
Milner, B., in Interhemispheric Relations and Cerebral Dominance (edit. by Mountcastle, V. B.), 177 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1962).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SATZ, P. Laterality Effects in Dichotic Listening. Nature 218, 277–278 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1038/218277a0
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/218277a0
This article is cited by
-
Lateralization of hand-movements in patients with affective psychoses during an interview situation: An attempt at a physiological interpretation
Psychological Research (1980)
-
Auditory and visual perception of simultaneous verbal and nonverbal stimuli
Experientia (1977)
-
Dichotic listening with related tasks for dyslexics—differential use of strategies
Bulletin of the Orton Society (1975)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.