Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Laterality Effects in Dichotic Listening

Abstract

THE hypothesis of a laterality effect in dichotic listening (D-L) has been challenged by Oxbury, Oxbury and Gardiner1. The authors concluded that the right ear superiority may have been the result of an attentional bias toward the right ear when free recall methods are used. This argument is based on the following data. When different half-spans of digits are presented in simultaneous pairs to each ear through stereo headphones, and at rapid rates, Ss tend to recall the messages (under free recall) by an ear order of report rather than by a temporal order of report2. Furthermore, information presented to the ear reported first (perceptual channel) is more accurately recalled than information presented to the ear reported second (delayed or storage channel). If therefore Ss, under free recall, tend to report more often from the right ear first, an ear asymmetry in favour of the right ear would be expected because of the failure to control for a bias in the order in which messages are reported. This hypothesis also assumes that the right ear superiority should disappear when the order of report is controlled1,3.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oxbury, S., Oxbury, J., and Gardiner, J., Nature, 214, 742 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Broadbent, D. E., J. Exp. Psychol., 47, 191 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Inglis, J., Acta Otolaryngol., Stockholm, 60, 231 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bryden, M. P., Canad. J. Psychol., 16, 291 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bryden, M. P., Acta Otolaryngol., 63, 595 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kimura, D., Canad. J. Psychol., 16, 18 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bartz, W., Satz, P., Fennell, E., and Lally, J. R., J. Exp. Psychol., 74, 132 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bartz, W., Satz, P., and Fennell, E., Proc. Amer. Psychol. Assoc., 2, 17 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bartz, W., Satz, P., and Fennell, E., J. Exp. Psychol., 73, 204 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Broadbent, D. E., and Gregory, M., Quart. J. Exp. Psychol., 16, 309 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bryden, M. P., J. Exp. Psychol., 65, 103 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper, A., Achenbach, K., Satz, P., and Levy, C. M., Psychon. Sci., 9, 97 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Satz, P., Achenbach, K., Pattishall, E., and Fennell, E., Cortex, 1, 377 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Borkowski, J., Spreen, O., and Stutz, J. Z., Psychon. Sci., 3, 547 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Satz, P., Achenbach, K., and Fennell, E., Neuropsychology, 5, 295 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dirks, D., Acta Otolaryngol., Stockholm, 58, 73 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Palmer, R. D., J. Psychol., 58, 157 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shaukweiler, D., and Studdert-Kennedy, M., Quart. J. Exp. Psychol., 19, 59 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kimura, D., Quart. J. Exp. Psychol., 16, 355 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shankweiler, D., J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 62, 115 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Roberts, L., in Handbook of Clinical Neurology (edit. by Vinken, P. J., and Bruyn, G. W.) (in the press).

  22. Tunturi, A. R., Amer. J. Physiol., 147, 311 (1946).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosenzweig, M. R., Amer. J. Physiol., 167, 147 (1951).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bocca, E., Calearo, C., Cassinari, V., and Migliavacca, F., Acta Otolaryngol., Stockholm, 45, 289 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kimura, D., Canad. J. Psychol., 15, 166 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Milner, B., in Interhemispheric Relations and Cerebral Dominance (edit. by Mountcastle, V. B.), 177 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SATZ, P. Laterality Effects in Dichotic Listening. Nature 218, 277–278 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1038/218277a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/218277a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing