Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Electrical Conductivity of Proteins

Abstract

THERE has been considerable speculation in recent years on the nature of the current carriers in electrical conductivity of proteins. Up to 1943, the prevailing opinion was that the conductivity of proteins with adsorbed water was ionic. Then Baxter1 suggested that his results were more consistent with an electronic conduction mechanism both in the dry and wet states. From their theoretical work, Evans and Gergely2 concluded that dry proteins should be electronic semi-conductors with an interband gap of about 3.0 eV. Proteins, in the dry and wet states, are indeed semiconductors, but with activation energies less than 3.0 eV. More recent experiments by King and Medley3 on very wet proteins (> 15 per cent adsorbed water) have shown that the passage of a d.c. current produces hydrogen by an electrolytic process in quantitative agreement with theory, Riehl4 has suggested that the conductivity of wet proteins is due to oriented water in an ice-like configuration. Cardew and Eley5 believe that dry proteins are electronic semi-conductors, and that in wet proteins the current carriers are probably protons.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baxter, S., Farad. Soc. Trans., 39, 207 (1943).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Evans, M. G., and Gergely, J., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 3, 188 (1949).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. King, G., and Medley, J. A., J. Colloid Sci., 4, 1 (1949).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Riehl, N., Kolloid Z., 151, 66 (1957); Naturwiss., 43, 145 (1956).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cardew, M. H., and Eley, D. D., Farad. Soc. Disc., 27, 115 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. See Taylor, P., Farad. Soc. Disc., 27, 239 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ROSENBERG, B. Electrical Conductivity of Proteins. Nature 193, 364–365 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1038/193364a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/193364a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing