Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Drift of Net Assimilation Rate in Plants

Abstract

IN reply to the letter from R. F. Williams1, may I say that I much regret not having mentioned his paper2 and that of Ballard and Petrie3 in my note on the effect of age on net assimilation and relative growth-rates in the cotton plant4, but I have just seen them for the first time. In stating that the absence of general trend of net assimilation rate up to time of flowering in my experiments was not proved, I was merely mentioning an inherent characteristic of the statistical test of significance. In testing the significance of a linear regression coefficient, the hypothesis is made that its true value is zero. This hypothesis may be disproved, at a given level of significance, in which case a significant general trend is shown, but it can never be finally proved. My results were clearly consistent with the hypothesis that the linear regression of net assimilation rate on time up to first flowering was zero, that is, that there was no general rise or fall, and it would seem, therefore, that to claim that my data confirmed the findings of Gregory5 for barley was justifiable. Furthermore, mzy results agreed with those obtained for cotton by Crowther6 in the Sudan, although no rigid statistical test was in the latter case applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams, R. F., NATURE, 140, 1099 (Dec. 25, 1937).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Williams, R. F., Austral. J. Exp. Biol., 14, 165 (1936).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ballard, L. A. T., and Petrie, A. H. K., Austral. J. Exp. Biol. 14, 135 (1936).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heath, O. V. S., Ann. Bot., N.S., 1, 565 (1937).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gregory, F. G., Ann. Bot., 40, 1 (1926).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Crowther, F., Ann. Bot., 48, 877 (1934).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Portsmouth, G. B., Ann. Bot., N.S., 1, 277 (1937).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HEATH, O. Drift of Net Assimilation Rate in Plants. Nature 141, 288–289 (1938). https://doi.org/10.1038/141288b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/141288b0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing