Why Your Highness Needs the People
Comparing the Absolute and Relative Representation of Power in Vertical Space
Abstract
Earlier research (Schubert, 2005) showed that power is represented in vertical space: powerful = up and powerless = down. We propose that power is not simply structured in space in absolute terms, but that relational differences in power moderate the vertical representation of the powerful above the powerless. Two studies reveal that, when power differences are present (vs. absent), the vertical representation of power increases reliably. Power-related words were positioned higher in vertical space (Experiments 1A and 1B), and translated above guessing average by the upper higher one of two Chinese ideographs (Experiments 2A and 2B) when power was manipulated within rather than between participants in an experimental task. These studies support the view that power relations constitute an important aspect of the vertical representation of power.
References
(1975). The locus of the semantic congruity effect in comparative judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 104, 35–47.
(2008). Grounding symbolic operations in the brain’s modal systems. In , Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 9–42). New York: Cambridge University Press.
(2007). Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31, 733–764.
(2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1–28.
(1971). Semantics in the perception of verticality. British Journal of Psychology, 62, 311–326.
(1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 76, 387–404.
(1973). Space, time, semantics and the child. In , Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.
(2009). Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism. Cognition, 110, 412–431.
(1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689–723.
(2002). Structure mapping in spatial reasoning. Cognitive Development, 17, 1157–1183.
(1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.
(2007). High in the hierarchy: How vertical location and judgments of leaders’ power are interrelated. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104, 30–44.
(2008). Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 905–919.
(1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In , Universals of grammar (pp. 73–113). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
(1994). Mental representation of social relationships: Dimensions, laws, or categories? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 575–584.
(2009). Weight as an embodiment of importance. Psychological Science, 20, 1169–1174.
(in press). But for the bad, there would not be good: Grounding valence in brightness through shared relational structures. Manuscript submitted for publication.
(2011). The sound of time: Cross-modal convergence in the spatial structuring of time. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 437–443.
(1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
(1994). Spatial attention and the apprehension of spatial relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1015–1036.
(2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102, 59–70.
(2004). Why the sunny side is up. Psychological Science, 15, 243–247.
(2007). What’s “up” with God? Vertical space as a representation of the divine. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 699–710.
(1996). On metaphoric representation. Cognition, 60, 173–204.
(2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27, 767–780.
(2001). “Language is spatial”: Experimental evidence for image schemas of concrete and abstract verbs. In , Proceedings of the 23rd annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 873–878). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 512–516.
(2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1–21.
(2009). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1135–1141.
(2009). Control over the association of power and size. Social Cognition, 27, 1–19.
(1982). Dominance cues in nonverbal behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 114–120.
(1973). Judgments of verticality and response availability. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1, 196–198.
(1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 515–557.
(1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Monograph Supplement, 9, 1–27.
(in press). Mighty metaphors: Behavioral and ERP evidence that power shifts attention on a vertical dimension. Manuscript submitted for publication.
(2009). Mental simulation in language comprehension and social cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1142–1150.
