Universal Phonological Features
Evidence From Phonological Similarity Judgement on Unknown Languages
Abstract
Abstract. The Theory of universal grammar suggests that human languages may share some similarities at the phonological level. Based on this hypothesis, we further propose a language generalization effect (LGE) and hypothesize that people may inherit the universal phonological features from their native languages and then transfer them to foreign languages. To test this hypothesis, in two experiments, participants listened to a pair of normal and syllable reversed recordings (Experiments 1a–1d) or normal and phonemic reversed recordings (Experiments 2a–2d) in unknown and native languages and reported their similarities. The results indicated that participants were more sensitive to the dissimilarities of normal recordings than to reversed ones. These results suggest that participants could identify the universal phonological features from normal recordings, but not reversed ones, and then adopt these features to better verify the dissimilarities of normal recordings. In sum, the current study first proposed the LGE and reported primary evidence to support it.
References
(1989). A middle palaeolithic human hyoid bone. Nature, 338, 758–760. https://doi.org/10.1038/338758a0
(2011). Phonemic diversity supports a serial founder effect model of language expansion from Africa. Science, 332, 346–349. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199295
(2000). Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 512–528. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/10.5.512
(1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2006). Language and mind (3rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2006). Language control in the bilingual brain. Science, 312, 1537–1540. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127761
(2010). Five-point Likert items: t test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 15, 1–12.
(2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x0999094x
(2000). The evolution of speech: A comparative review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01494-7
(2005). The evolution of language: A comparative review. Biology and Philosophy, 20, 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-5597-1
(2011). Unity and diversity in human language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 376–388. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0223
(2014). A language-familiarity effect for speaker discrimination without comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 13795–13798. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1401383111
(2011). The origin and evolution of word order. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 17290–17295. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1113716108
(2014). The evolution of speech: Vision, rhythm, cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.06.004
(2013). A noisy-channel account of crosslinguistic word-order variation. Psychological Science, 24, 1079–1088. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612463705
(2005). Ethnologue: Languages of the world (15 ed.). Dallas, TX: SIL International.
(1988). Maternal speech to infants in a tonal language: Support for universal prosodic features in motherese. Developmental Psychology, 24, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.24.1.14
(2007). Phoneme inventory size and population size. Language, 83, 388–400. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2007.0071
(2000). Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01463-7
(2004). The origin of speech. Science, 303, 1316–1319. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.303.5662.1316
(2011). Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience. Developmental Science, 14, 1002–1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01052.x
(1997). Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. Science, 277, 684–686. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5326.684
(2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 9096–9101. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1532872100
(2015). Ethnologue: Languages of the world (18th ed.). Dallas, TX: SIL International.
(1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(74)90101-5
(1972). Phonetic ability and related anatomy of the newborn and adult human, neanderthal man, and the chimpanzee. American Anthropologist, 74, 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1972.74.3.02a00020
(2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15, 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
(2000). The evolution of syntactic communication. Nature, 404, 495–498. https://doi.org/10.1038/35006635
. (2005). Open Speech Repository. Retrieved from http://www.voiptroubleshooter.com/open_speech/index.html
(2009). Differential neural contributions to native- and foreign-language talker identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1950–1960. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015869
(2007). Learning to recognize speakers of a non-native language: Implications for the functional organization of human auditory cortex. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1899–1910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.015
(1995). The language instinct: The new science of language and mind. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
(2010). The anatomy of language: A review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 62–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05444.x
(2012). A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of pet and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading. Neuroimage, 62, 816–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.062
(2014). Analyzing the rate at which languages lose the influence of a common ancestor. Cognitive Science, 38, 1406–1431. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12112
(2009). Hearing illusory sounds in noise: The timing of sensory-perceptual transformations in auditory cortex. Neuron, 64, 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.10.016
(2007). Hearing illusory sounds in noise: Sensory-perceptual transformations in primary auditory cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 12684–12689. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2713-07.2007
(2014). The semantic origins of word order. Cognition, 131, 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.004
(1996). Perceptual features of unknown foreign languages as revealed by multi-dimensional scaling. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, October 3–6 (pp. 1748–1751). Philadelphia, PA: IEEE.
(1987). A language effect in voice identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350010205
