Reversing the Manual Digit Bias in Two-Digit Number Comparison
Abstract
Abstract. Though recent work in numerical cognition has supported a strong tie between numerical and spatial representations (e.g., a mental number line), less is known about such ties in multi-digit number representations. Along this line, Bloechle, Huber, and Moeller (2015) found that pointing positions in two-digit number comparison were biased leftward toward the decade digit. Moreover, this bias was reduced in unit-decade incompatible pairs. In the present study, we tracked computer mouse movements as participants compared two-digit numbers to a fixed standard (55). Similar to Bloechle et al. (2015), we found that trajectories exhibited a leftward bias that was reduced for unit-decade incompatible comparisons. However, when positions of response labels were reversed, the biases reversed. That is, we found a rightward bias for compatible pairs that was reduced for incompatible pairs. This result calls into question a purely embodied representation of place value structure and instead supports a competition model of two-digit number representation.
References
(2014). Response dynamics in prospective memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1020–1028. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0771-6
(2016). Spatial coding as a function of handedness and responding hand: Theoretical and methodological implications. PLoS One, 11, e0151979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151979
(2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
(2015). In touch with numbers: Embodied and situated effects in number magnitude comparison. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 478–489. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2014.1001760
(1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 626–641. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.3.626
(2013). How do we convert a number into a finger trajectory? Cognition, 129, 512–529. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.007
(2016). Reach tracking reveals dissociable processes underlying cognitive control. Cognition, 152, 114–126. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.015
(2014). Hand movements reflect competitive processing in numerical cognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 147–151. doi: 10.1037/cep0000021
(2016). Testing a direct mapping versus competition account of response dynamics in number comparison. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28, 825–842. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2016.1191504
(2016). Response trajectories capture the continuous dynamics of the size congruity effect. Acta Psychologica, 163, 114–123. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.010
(2015). Response trajectories reveal the temporal dynamics of fraction representations. Acta Psychologica, 159, 100–107. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.05.013
(2014). Extending the reach of mousetracking in numerical cognition: A comment on fischer and hartmann (2014). Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1436. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01436
(2016). Commentary: Is there any influence of variations in context on object-affordance effects in schizophrenia? Perception of property and goals of action. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1915. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01915
(2008). Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex, 44, 386–392. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.004
(2014). Pushing forward in embodied cognition: May we mouse the mathematical mind? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1315. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01315
(2009). Motions of the hand expose the partial and parallel activation of stereotypes. Psychological Science, 20, 1183–1188. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02422.x
(2010). MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 226–241. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.226
(2011). Hand movements reveal the time-course of shape and pigmentation processing in face categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 705–712. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0097-6
(2011). Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00059
(2014). Reaching towards an end: Numerical end and distance effects in motor movements. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 490–498. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2014.950662
(2010). Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of numberspace interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 180–190. doi: 10.1037/a0017688
(2006). Numbers and space: A computational model of the SNARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 32–44. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.32
(2015). Temporal dynamics of number-space interaction in line bisection: Comment on cleland and bull (2015). The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, , 1–7. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1095773
(2014). Early processing of gendered facial cues predicts the electoral success of female politicians. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 815–824. doi: 10.1177/1948550614534701
(1981). Two-digit number comparison: Use of place information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 890–901. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.7.4.890
(2015). Mouse tracking reveals that bilinguals behave like experts. Bilingualism, 19, 610–620. doi: 10.1017/s1366728915000218
(2006). Interaction between space and number representations during motor preparation in manual aiming. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1009–1016. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.11.008
(1961). The theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(2007). Getting a grip on numbers: Numerical magnitude priming in object grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1400–1409. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1400
(1957). A statistical paradox. Biometrika, 44, 187–192. doi: 10.1093/biomet/44.1-2.187
(2014). Doing arithmetic by hand: Hand movements during exact arithmetic reveal systematic, dynamic spatial processing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1579–1596. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.897359
(2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 679–690. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5
(1992). Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: Evidence from acquired dyscalculia. Cognition, 44, 107–157. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90052-j
(2009). Sequential or parallel decomposed processing of two-digit numbers? Evidence from eye-tracking. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 323–334. doi: 10.1080/17470210801946740
(2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to cousineau (2005). Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 61–64.
(1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519–1520. doi: 10.1038/2151519a0
(2004). On the development of the mental number line: More, less, or never holistic with increasing age? Developmental Psychology, 40, 1199–1211. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1199
(2001). Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins. Cognition, 82, B25–B33. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00142-1
(2005). On the magnitude representations of two-digit numbers. Psychology Science, 47, 52–72.
(2012). Memory in motion: Movement dynamics reveal memory strength. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 906–913. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0281-3
(2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416–442. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.416
. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
(1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 274–278. doi: 10.1037/h0028573
(2011). The processing of two-digit numbers depends on task instructions. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 219, 37–41. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000044
(2006). The Simon effect and handedness: Evidence for a dominant-hand attentional bias in spatial coding. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 1059–1069. doi: 10.3758/bf03193709
(2016). Sequence learning in Parkinson’s disease: Focusing on action dynamics and the role of dopaminergic medication. Neuropsychologia, 93, 30–39. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.09.027
(2008). The SNARC effect does not imply a mental number line. Cognition, 108, 263–270. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.01.002
(2011). Distance in motion: Response trajectories reveal the dynamics of number comparison. PloS One, 6, e25429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025429
(2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 328–331. doi: 10.3758/pbr.16.2.328
(2008). Numeric comparison in a visually-guided manual reaching task. Cognition, 106, 994–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.014
(2007). The continuity of mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
(2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 10393–10398. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503903102
(2015). Choice reaching with a LEGO arm robot (CoRLEGO): The motor system guides visual attention to movement-relevant information. Neural Networks, 72, 3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2015.10.005
(2015). The sound of voice: Voice-based categorization of speakers’ sexual orientation within and across languages. PLoS One, 10, e0128882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128882
(2005). Two-digit comparison: Decomposed, holistic, or hybrid? Experimental Psychology, 52, 195–200. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.3.195
(2005). A model of exact small-number representation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 66–80. doi: 10.3758/bf03196349
(2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779–804. doi: 10.3758/bf03194105
(2006). What do semi-illiterate adults know about 2-digit Arabic numbers? Cortex, 42, 48–56. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70321-6
