Abstract
Abstract. The Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP) has been forwarded as one of the most promising alternatives to the Implicit Association Test and the evaluative-priming task for measuring attitudes such as prejudice indirectly. We investigated whether the AMP is indeed able to detect an evaluative out-group bias. In contrast to recent conclusions about the robustness of AMP effects, six out of seven pilot studies indicated that participants did not show any prejudice effects in the AMP. Yet, these pilot studies were not fully conclusive with regard to our research question because they investigated different domains of prejudice, used small sample sizes, and employed a modified AMP version. In a preregistered, high-powered AMP study, we therefore examined whether the standard AMP does reveal prejudice against Turks, the biggest minority in Germany, and found a significant, albeit very small prejudice effect. We discuss possible reasons for the AMP’s weak sensitivity to evaluations in socially sensitive domains.
References
2010). Stereotypes of social groups in Germany in terms of warmth and competence. Social Psychology, 41, 76–81. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000011
(2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380–393. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.380
(2012). The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 543–554. doi: 10.1177/1745691612459060
(2012). Reporting intentional rating of the primes predicts priming effects in the affective misattribution procedure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1194–1208. doi: 10.1177/0146167212446835
(2006). Arbitrary metrics in psychology. The American Psychologist, 61, 27–41. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.1.27
(2012). Sequential priming measures of implicit social cognition: A meta-analysis of associations with behaviors and explicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 330–350. doi: 10.1177/1088868312440047
(2014). Implicit bias and the illusion of conscious ill will. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 500–507. doi: 10.1177/1948550613506123
(2014). Emotional expression is preferentially processed in implicit evaluations of faces varying in race or age. Emotion, 14, 865–877. doi: 10.1037/a0037270
(2009). Category boundaries can be accentuated without increasing intergroup bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relationships, 12, 175–193. doi: 10.1177/1368430208101055
(2008). The extrinsic affective Simon task as an instrument for indirect assessment of prejudice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1033–1043. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.536
(2011). Types of automatically activated prejudice: Assessing possessor-versus other-relevant valence in the evaluative priming task. Social Cognition, 29, 182–209. doi: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.2.182
(2007). Hostility-related prejudice against Turks in adolescents: Masked affective priming allows for a differentiation of automatic prejudice. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 245–256. doi: 10.1080/01973530701503150
(2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347–368. doi: 10.1037/a0014211
(2013). Relationship between implicit and explicit measures of attitudes: The impact of application conditions. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9, 231–245. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v9i2.544
(2015). Watch the target! Effects in the affective misattribution procedure become weaker (but not eliminated) when participants are motivated to provide accurate responses to the target. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1442. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01442
(1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013
(2001). Der Einfluss wahrgenommener Bedrohung auf die Nutzung automatischer Assoziationen bei der Personenbeurteilung
([The influence of perceived threat on the use of automatic associations in person judgments] . Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 32, 249–259. doi: 10.1024/0044-3514.32.4.2492002). What does the Implicit Association Test measure? A test of the convergent and discriminant validity of prejudice-related IATs. Experimental Psychology, 49, 171–180. doi: 10.1026/1618-3169.49.3.171
(2010). Attentional influences on affective priming: Does categorisation influence spontaneous evaluation of multiply categorisable objects? Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1008–1025. doi: 10.1080/02699930903112712
(2014).
(Implicit measures in social and personality psychology . In H. T. ReisC. M. JuddEds., Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed, pp. 283–310). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.2003). Implicit bias in impression formation: Associations influence the construal of individuating information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 573–589. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.166
(2010). Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2008). Understanding the relations between different forms of racial prejudice: A cognitive consistency perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 648–665. doi: 10.1177/0146167207313729
(2004). On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency. Dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 335–542. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.10.005
(2014). What drives priming effects in the affect misattribution procedure? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 3–15. doi: 10.1177/0146167213502548
(2015). Prevention of intention invention in the affect misattribution procedure. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 101–108. doi: 10.1177/1948550614543029
(2015). Statistically small effects of the Implicit Association Test can have societally large effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 553–561. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000016
(1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
(2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41. doi: 10.1037/a0015575
(2006). Synergistic moderator effects of situation and person factors of awareness and adjustment on the consistency of implicit and explicit attitudes. Journal of Individual Differences, 27, 47–56. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001.27.1.47
(2009). Social power increases implicit prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 299–307. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.11.012
(1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141–154. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1031(77)80007-3
(2008). Implicit and explicit attitudes and interracial interaction: The moderating role of situationally available control resources. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11, 69–87. doi: 10.1177/1368430207084847
(2005). What moderates implicit-explicit consistency? European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 335–390. doi: 10.1080/10463280500443228
(2009). Ongoing victim suffering increases prejudice. Psychological Science, 20, 1443–1447. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02457.x
(1971). The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 349–364. doi: 10.1037/h0031617
(2000). “Stechen statt sprechen” : Valenz und Aktivierbarkeit von Stereotypen über Türken
([Valence and activation of stereotypes about Turks] . Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 31, 31–34. doi: 10.1024/0044-3514.31.1.312010). Understanding the role of executive control in the Implicit Association Test: Why flexible people have small IAT effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 595–619. doi: 10.1080/17470210903076826
(1999). Discrimination against ethnic minorities in Germany: Going back to the field. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 402–423. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01394.x
(2012). Disentangling stereotype activation and stereotype application in the Stereotype Misperception Task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 205–224. doi: 10.1037/a0028764
(2014). Sailing from the seas of chaos into the corridors of stability: Practical recommendations to increase the informational value of studies. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 278–292. doi: 10.1177/1745691614528520
(2014). Decisions among the undecided: Implicit attitudes predict future voting behavior of undecided voters. PLoS One, 9, e85680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085680
(2011). Effects of allocation of attention on initial facial race discrimination, Unpublished bachelor’s thesis. Stockholm, Sweden: Lund University.
(2001). The structure of prejudice: Associative strength as a determinant of stereotype endorsement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 609–620. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.69
(1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
(2012). Scientific utopia: I. Opening scientific communication. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 217–243. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.692215
(2014). Registered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000192
(2001). Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 12, 413–417. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00376
(2003). Relations between implicit measures of racial prejudice: What are we measuring? Psychological Science, 14, 636–639. doi: 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1477.x
(2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716
. (2013). Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 171–192. doi: 10.1037/a0032734
(2015). Using the IAT to predict ethnic and racial discrimination: Small effect sizes of unknown societal significance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 562–571. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000023
(2013). Intention invention and the affect misattribution procedure: Reply to Bar-Anan and Nosek (2012). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 375–386. doi: 10.1177/0146167212475225
(2008). Why do implicit and explicit tests diverge? The role of structural fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 16–31. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.16
(2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277
(2008). Automatic attitudes and alcohol: Does implicit liking predict drinking? Cognition and Emotion, 22, 238–271. doi: 10.1080/02699930701357394
(2010). A process model of affect misattribution. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 36, 1397–1408. doi: 10.1177/0146167210383440
(2010). Implicit and explicit prejudice in the 2008 American presidential election. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 367–374. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.11.001
(2014). The Affect Misattribution Procedure: Ten years of evidence on reliability, validity, and mechanisms. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 672–686. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12148
(1998). Reactions towards the new minorities of Western Europe. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 77–103. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.77
(2012). Automatically activated facets of ageism: Masked evaluative priming allows for a differentiation of age-related prejudice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 852–863. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1912
(2012). The role of affect in the control of attention to monoracial and racially ambiguous faces. Unpublished bachelor’s thesis. Williamsburg, VA.
(2012). The infection of bad company: Stigma by association. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 224–241. doi: 10.1037/a0026270
(1979). The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
(2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225–237. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
(2015). Small telescopes: Detectability and the evaluation of replication results. Psychological Science, 26, 559–569. doi: 10.1177/0956797614567341
(2013).
(Investigating the other-race effect of Germans toward Turks and Arabs using multinomial processing tree models . In M. KnauffM. PauenN. SebanzI. WachsmuthEds., Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1330–1335). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.2013). On the controllability of evaluative-priming effects: Some limits that are none. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 632–657. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.732041
(2015).
(Implicit association test . In J. D. WrightEd., International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 11 pp. 703–708). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.2010).
(Practical guide to implicit association test and related tasks . In B. GawronskiB. K. PayneEds., Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. S. 117–139). New York, NY: Guilford Press.2016). Controlling the “Uncontrollable”: Faking effects on the affect misattribution procedure. Cognition and Emotion, 30, 1470–1484. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1070793
(2014, June 27). Replication difficulties of Payne, Hall, Cameron, and Bishara’s (2010) multinomial processing tree model of the affect misattribution procedure. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2459994
(2013). Perspective taking and automatic intergroup evaluation change: Testing an associative self-anchoring account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 786–802. doi: 10.1037/a0031999
(1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Weasley.
(2000). Sozialpsychologische Analysen und Erklärungen von Fremdenfeindlichkeit in Deutschland
([Social psychological analyses and explanations for hostility towards strangers in Germany] . Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 32, 59–79. doi: 10.1024//0044-3514.32.2.592013). Implicit measures of homophobia and stigmatization of same-sex couples. Unpublished master’s thesis. Tempe, AZ.
(2010).
(A practical guide to sequential priming and related tasks . In B. GawronskiB. K. PayneEds., Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 95–116). New York, NY: Guilford Press.2012). A default Bayesian hypothesis test for correlations and partial correlations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 1057–1064. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0295-x
(2012). Using SPSS to obtain a confidence interval for Cohen’s d. Retrieved from http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/SPSS/CI-d-SPSS.pdf
(