Employing Automatic Approach and Avoidance Tendencies for the Assessment of Implicit Personality Self-Concept
The Implicit Association Procedure (IAP)
Abstract
A new chronometric procedure, the Implicit Association Procedure (IAP), was adapted to assess the implicit personality self-concept of shyness. A sample of 300 participants completed a shyness-inducing role play and, before or after the role play, a shyness IAP, a shyness Implicit Association Test (IAT), and direct self-ratings. The experimental group was instructed to fake nonshyness. The control group did not receive this instruction. IAT and IAP were unaffected by position effects, and were less susceptible to faking than direct self-ratings with regard to mean levels and correlates. Under faking, correlations between direct and indirect measures decreased, and direct but not indirect measures showed higher correlations with social desirability and lower correlations with observed shyness. Despite many similarities, the true correlation between IAT and IAP was estimated only .61, indicating high method-specific variance in both procedures. The findings suggest that indirect measures are more robust against faking than traditional self-ratings but do not yet meet psychometric criteria for practical assessment purposes.
References
(2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380– 393
(2005). Indirectly measuring evaluations of several attitude objects in relation to a neutral reference point. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 346– 368
(1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215– 224
(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4– 27
(1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464– 1480
(2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: 1. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197– 216
(1969). Skalen zur Messung Manifester Angst (MAS) und sozialer Wünschbarkeit (SDS-E und SDS-CM) [Scales for the assessment of manifest anxiety (MAS) and social desirability (SDS-E and SDS-CM)]. Diagnostica, 15, 134– 141
(2004). Attitudes towards people with Aids and avoidance behavior: Automatic and reflective bases of behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 543– 550
in press The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Automatic processes in social thinking and behavior. Psychology Press.
(2004). Does the Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety measure trait and state variance?. European Journal of Personality, 18, 483– 494
(2004). Implicit personality self-concept: Assessment and validation. Doctoral dissertation available at edoc.hu-berlin.de/dissertationen/schnabel-konrad-2004-04-19/PDF/Schnabel.pdf.
in press Assessment of implicit personality self-concept using the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Concurrent assessment of anxiousness and angriness. British Journal of Social Psychology,
(1999). Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität [The social desirability scale 17: Development and first results on reliability and validity]. Diagnostica, 45, 173– 177
(2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220– 247
