Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Research Article

Support for Freedom of Speech and Concern for Political Correctness

The Effects of Trait Emotional Intelligence and Cognitive Ability

Published Online:December 21, 2022https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000385

Abstract

Abstract: Freedom of speech and political correctness are recurrent and contentious topics in contemporary society. The present study (N = 300 North-American adults) aimed to advance empirical knowledge on these issues by investigating how cognitive ability and trait emotional intelligence predict individuals’ support for freedom of speech and concern for political correctness, considering empathy and intellectual humility as mediating variables. We demonstrate that both trait emotional intelligence and cognitive ability uniquely predict less concern for political correctness and more support for freedom of speech. Mediation through empathy slightly suppressed the effects of cognitive ability and emotional intelligence on concern for political correctness, whereas intellectual humility no longer served as a mediating variable in the overall path analysis. Possible mechanisms, implications, and avenues for future research are discussed.

References

  • Ammons, R. B., & Ammons, C. H. (1962). Quick Test. Psychological Test Specialists. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, C. B. (1992). Political correctness on college campuses: Freedom of speech v. doing the politically correct thing. SMU Law Review, 46, 171–224. https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol46/iss1/10 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., & Salovey, P. (2011). Emotional intelligence: Implications for personal, social, academic, and workplace success. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00334.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Self-consciousness and reactance. Journal of Research in Personality, 15(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(81)90003-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Conway, L. G., Repke, M. A., & Houck, S. C. (2017). Donald Trump as a cultural revolt against perceived communication restriction: Priming political correctness norms causes more Trump support. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5(1), 244–259. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v5i1.732 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cowan, G., & Khatchadourian, D. (2003). Empathy, ways of knowing, and interdependence as mediators of gender differences in attitudes toward hate speech and freedom of speech. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27(4), 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00110 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cowan, G., Resendez, M., Marshall, E., & Quist, R. (2002). Hate speech and constitutional protection: Priming values of equality and freedom. Journal of Social Issues, 58(2), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00259 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • De keersmaecker, J., Bostyn, D. H., Van Hiel, A., & Roets, A. (2021). Disliked but free to speak: Cognitive ability is related to supporting freedom of speech for groups across the ideological spectrum. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619896168 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • De keersmaecker, J., & Roets, A. (2022). Supplemental materials to “Support for freedom of speech and concern for political correctness: The effects of trait emotional intelligence and cognitive ability” https://osf.io/7gkx4/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Downs, D. M., & Cowan, G. (2012). Predicting the importance of freedom of speech and the perceived harm of hate speech. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(6), 1353–1375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00902.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fernández-Abascal, E. G., & Martín-Díaz, M. D. (2019). Relations between dimensions of emotional intelligence, specific aspects of empathy, and non-verbal sensitivity. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01066 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Galotti, K. M., Clinchy, B. M., Ainsworth, K. H., Lavin, B., & Mansfield, A. F. (1999). A new way of assessing ways of knowing: The Attitudes Toward Thinking and Learning Survey (ATTLS). Sex Roles, 40(9/10), 745–766. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018860702422 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gates, H. L., Griffin, A. P., Lively, D. E., & Strossen, N. (1994). Speaking of race, speaking of sex: Hate speech, civil rights, and civil liberties. New York University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jarvinen, M. J., & Paulus, T. B. (2017). Attachment and cognitive openness: Emotional underpinnings of intellectual humility. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1167944 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kluemper, D. H. (2008). Trait emotional intelligence: The impact of core-self evaluations and social desirability. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(6), 1402–1412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.12.008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., & Rouse, S. V. (2016). The development and validation of the Comprehensive Intellectual Humility Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1068174 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Leary, M. R., Diebels, K. J., Davisson, E. K., Jongman-Sereno, K. P., Isherwood, J. C., Raimi, K. T., Deffler, S. A., & Hoyle, R. H. (2017). Cognitive and interpersonal features of intellectual humility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(6), 793–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217697695 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mayer, J. D. (2002). MSCEIT: Mayer-Salovey-Caruso emotional intelligence test. Multi-Health Systems. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Middleton, J., Buboltz, W., & Sopon, B. (2015). The relationship between psychological reactance and emotional intelligence. The Social Science Journal, 52(4), 542–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2015.08.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moss, J. T., & O’Connor, P. J. (2020). Political correctness and the alt-right: The development of extreme political attitudes. PLoS One, 15(10), Article e0239259. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239259 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Onraet, E., Van Hiel, A., De keersmaecker, J., & Fontaine, J. R. (2017). The relationship of trait emotional intelligence with right-wing attitudes and subtle racial prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 110(1), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.017 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2003). Trait emotional intelligence: behavioural validation in two studies of emotion recognition and reactivity to mood induction. European Journal of Personality, 17(1), 39–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.466 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2006). The role of trait emotional intelligence in a gender specific model of organizational variables. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(2), 552–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00019.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pettersson, K. (2019). “Freedom of speech requires actions”: Exploring the discourse of politicians convicted of hate‐speech against Muslims. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(5), 938–952. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2577 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Qualter, P., Gardner, K. J., Pope, D. J., Hutchinson, J. M., & Whiteley, H. E. (2012). Ability emotional intelligence, trait emotional intelligence, and academic success in British secondary schools: A 5 year longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rix, J. (2006). Does it matter what we call them? Labeling people on the basis of notions of intellect. Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics, 3(4), 22–28. https://oro.open.ac.uk/6515/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenblum, M., Schroeder, J., & Gino, F. (2020). Tell it like it is: When politically incorrect language promotes authenticity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(1), 75–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000206 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shen, F., & Tsui, L. (2018). Revisiting the Asian Values Thesis: An empirical study of Asian values, Internet use, and support for freedom of expression in 11 societies. Asian Survey, 58(3), 535–556. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2018.58.3.535 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shen, L. (2010). Mitigating psychological reactance: The role of message-induced empathy in persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36(3), 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01381.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Siegling, A. B., Saklofske, D. H., & Petrides, K. V. (2015). Measures of ability and trait emotional intelligence. In G. J. BoyleG. MatthewsD. H. SaklofskeEds., Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 381–414). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386915-9.00014-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Strauts, E., & Blanton, H. (2015). That’s not funny: Instrument validation of the concern for Political Correctness Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 80, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.012 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Talbot, M. (2007). Political correctness and freedom of speech. In M. HellingerA. PauwelsEds., Handbook of language and communication: Diversity and change (pp. 751–764). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198539 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • UN General Assembly. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights (217 [III] A). https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/2021/03/udhr.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zagar, R. J., Kovach, J. W., Busch, K. G., Zablocki, M. D., Osnowitz, W., Neuhengen, J., Liu, Y., & Zagar, A. K. (2013). Ammons quick test validity among randomly selected referrals. Psychological reports, 113(3), 823–854. https://doi.org/10.2466/03.04.PR0.113x29z0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar