Reducing Endorsement of Benevolent and Modern Sexist Beliefs
Differential Effects of Addressing Harm Versus Pervasiveness of Benevolent Sexism
Abstract
In two experiments, the present research identifies basic mechanisms for reducing endorsement of benevolent and modern sexist beliefs. Responses to attitudinal measures and a collective action measure on policy beliefs in Study 1 (N = 164) as well as to dating profiles in Study 1 and Study 2 (N = 159) support the hypothesis that endorsement of benevolent sexist beliefs can be reduced by providing information about its harmful consequences. Moreover, women and men become more aware of the full scope of gender discrimination and reduce their endorsement of modern sexist beliefs when they are provided with information about the harmful nature and pervasiveness of benevolent sexism. Theoretical implications regarding the linkage between benevolent and modern sexist beliefs and practical implications for reducing sexism are discussed.
References
2005a). The burden of Benevolent Sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633–642.
(2005b). The perils of political correctness: Men’s and women’s responses to old-fashioned and modern sexist views. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 75–88.
(2010). How nice of us and how dumb of me: The effects of exposure to benevolent sexism on women’s task and relational self-descriptions. Sex Roles, 62, 532–544.
(2010). Why do women endorse hostile and benevolent sexism? The role of salient female subtypes and personalization of sexist contents. Sex Roles, 62, 453–467.
(2011). Seeing the unseen: Attention to daily encounters with sexism as a way to reduce sexist beliefs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 227–242.
(2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 62–77.
(2010). How sexy are sexist men? Women’s perception of male response profiles in the ambivalent sexism inventory. Sex Roles, 62, 568–582.
(1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluated dependence. New York: Wiley.
(2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 764–779.
(2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62–68.
(1998). Leugnung von Diskriminierung: Eine Skala zur Erfassung des Modernen Sexismus [
(Denial of discrimination: A scale measuring modern sexism ]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 29, 224–238.1999). Hostilität und Benevolenz: Skala zur Erfassung des Ambivalenten Sexismus [
(Hostility and benevolence: A scale measuring ambivalent sexism ]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 30, 211–228.2009). Intended and unintended consequences of internal motivation to behave nonprejudiced: The case of benevolent discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1093–1108.
(1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323–1334.
(1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
(2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.
(1994 ). Entwicklung und Validierung eines Inventars zur Erfassung von Bindungsstilen in Partnerschaften [Development and validation of scale measuring attachment styles in couples ]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Philipps University Marburg, Germany..1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
(2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509.
(1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism? Sex Roles, 39, 333–352.
(2008). A real time social norms intervention to reduce male sexism. Sex Roles, 59, 264–273.
(2002). Self-Monitoring und Authentizität: Die verkannten Selbstdarsteller [
(Self-monitoring and authenticity: The misjudged self-presenters ]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 23, 129–148.2007). It’s for your own good: Benevolent sexism and women’s tolerance of paternalistic discrimination by intimate partners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1421–1434.
(in press ). The impact of the “Workshop Activity for Gender Equity Simulation in the Academy,” (WAGES-Academic) in demonstrating cumulative effects of gender bias. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education.2001). Changing racial beliefs by providing consensus information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 486–496.
(1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214.
(2010). Core dimensions of contemporary measures of sexist beliefs. Manuscript submitted for publication.
(2005). Judgments of sexism. A comparison of the subtlety of sexism measures and sources of variability in judgments of sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 406–411.
(1995). Neosexism: Plus ca change, plus c’est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842–849.
(2005). Power and the creation of patronizing environments: The stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 658–672.
(2006). Entwicklung einer deutschen Kurzskala zur zweidimensionalen Messung von sozialer Erwünschtheit [
(Development of a German survey instrument of two-dimensional social desirability ]. DIW Discussion paper, 579, 1–31.