Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Communication

Testing the Retrieval Effort Theory

Evidence from the Time-Dependent Effect of Testing on Memory for English-Chinese Paired Associates

Published Online:August 12, 2019https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000229

Abstract

Abstract. Testing effect refers to the phenomenon that, relative to relearning, retrieval practice enhances delayed memory performance. In two experiments, this study tested the retrieval effort theory proposed to explain the enhancement effect of testing. In Experiment 1, participants learned English words with their corresponding Chinese definitions. Then they were tested on half of the encoded items and restudied the remaining half under three delays after encoding (0 min, 20 min, and 40 min). All participants took delayed memory tests 60 min after the end of the initial encoding phase. The result showed that testing conducted 20 min after encoding, but not immediately or 40 min after encoding, enhanced memory retention. In Experiment 2, feedback was provided to ensure more equitable exposure across the conditions, and then the final memory test was conducted 24 h after the end of learning. The result showed that testing enhanced memory retention across the three delay conditions, and that the size of the testing effect increased with the extension of the interval between initial learning and retrieval practice, thus providing support for the retrieval theory.

References

  • Abel, M., & Roediger, H. L. (2017). Comparing the testing effect under blocked and mixed practice: The mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice are not affected by practice format. Memory & Cognition, 45, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0641-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Agarwal, P. K., Finley, J. R., Rose, N. S., & Roediger, H. L. (2016). Benefits from retrieval practice are greater for students with lower working memory capacity. Memory, 25, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1220579 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Antony, J. W., Ferreira, C. S., Norman, K. A., & Wimber, M. (2017). Retrieval as a fast route to memory consolidation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 573–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bahrick, H. P., & Phelps, E. (1987). Retention of Spanish vocabulary over 8 years. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 344–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.13.2.344 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bjork, R. A. (1999). Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. In D. GopherA. KoriatEds., Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 435–459). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1118–1133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019902 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carpenter, S. K., & DeLosh, E. L. (2005). Application of the testing and spacing effects to name learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 619–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1101 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carpenter, S. K., & DeLosh, E. L. (2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect. Memory & Cognition, 34, 268–276. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193405 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cepeda, N. J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., & Pashler, H. (2008). Spacing effects in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 19, 1095–1102. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Challis, B. H. (1993). Spacing effects on cued-memory tests depend on level of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.389 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Coppens, L. C., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2011). Learning Adinkra symbols: The effect of testing. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.507188 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Coren, S. (1988). Prediction of insomnia from arousability predisposition scores: Scale development and cross-validation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 26, 415–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(88)90076-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cull, W. L. (2000). Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(200005/06)14:3<215::AID-ACP640>3.0.CO;2-1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dempster, F. N. (1987). Effects of variable encoding and spaced presentations on vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.2.162 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Graves, M. F. (2006). The vocabulary book: Learning and instruction, 2–3. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Greene, R. L. (1990). Spacing effects on implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1004–1011. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.6.1004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotional regulations processes: Implications for affect, relationships and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46, 643–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01355.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jones, F. R. (1995). Learning an alien lexicon: A teach-yourself case study. Second Language Research, 11, 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839501100202 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jönsson, F. U., Kubik, V., Sundqvist, M. L., Todorov, I., & Jonsson, B. (2014). How crucial is the response format for the testing effect? Psychological Research, 78, 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0522-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kang, S. H. (2010). Enhancing visuospatial learning: The benefit of retrieval practice. Memory & Cognition, 38, 1009–1017. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.8.1009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kang, S. H., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 528–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440601056620 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Karpicke, J. D., & Aue, W. R. (2015). The testing effect is alive and well with complex materials. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9309-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 704–719. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.704 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 15, 966–968. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152408 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kornell, N., Bjork, R. A., & Garcia, M. A. (2011). Why tests appear to prevent forgetting: A distribution-based bifurcation model. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Landauer, T. K., & Bjork, R. A. (1978). Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In Practical aspects of memory (pp. 625–632). London, UK: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lawson, M. J., & Hogden, D. (1996). The vocabulary-learning strategies of foreign language students. Language Learning, 46, 101–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb00642.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Loprinzi, P. D., Frith, E., Edwards, M. K., Sng, E., & Ashpole, N. (2018). The effects of exercise on memory function among young to middle-aged adults: Systematic review and recommendations for future research. American Journal of Health Promotion, 32, 691–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117117737409 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McDaniel, M. A., Anderson, J. L., Derbish, M. H., & Morrisette, N. (2007). Testing the testing effect in the classroom. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 494–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701326154 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mulligan, N. W., & Picklesimer, M. (2016). Attention and the testing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 42, 938–950. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000227 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rawson, K. A., Vaughn, K. E., & Carpenter, S. K. (2015). Does the benefit of testing depend on lag, and if so, why? Evaluating the elaborative retrieval hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 43, 619–633. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0477-z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus relearning on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1432–1463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037559 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sensenig, A. E., Littrell-Baez, M. K., & DeLosh, E. L. (2011). Testing effects for common versus proper names. Memory, 19, 664–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2011.599935 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, P. R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, A. G. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Walker, M. P., & Stickgold, R. (2004). Sleep-dependent learning and memory consolidation. Neuron, 44, 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.031 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Whitten, W. B. II, & Bjork, R. A. (1977). Learning from tests: Effects of spacing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80040-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar