Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Emergency and Disaster: Pervasive Risk and Public Bureaucracy in Developing Nations

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Developing nations experience pervasive risk of devastation, human and property loss resulting from human and natural disasters. This level of risk is attributable to socioeconomic stress, aging and inadequate physical infrastructure, weak education and preparedness for disaster and insufficient fiscal and economic resources to carefully implement the preparedness, response, mitigation and recovery components of integrated emergency management. This article examines these dynamics using a conceptual framework derived from chaos theory and emergency management theory and raises several critical methodological issues related to inquiries into disaster and emergency management dynamics in developing nations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albala-Bertrand, J.M. (1993). “Natural Disaster Situations and Growth: A Macroeconomic Model for Sudden Disaster Impacts.” World Development 21(9), 1417–1435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asmeron, H.K. (1993). “The Impact of Structural Adjustment Policy on Administrative Reform and Strategy.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Policy-Making, Bureaucracy and Structural Adjustment in Developing Societies, University of Delhi, February 25–27, p. 9.

  • Bryant, C., and G. White. (1982). Managing Development in the Third World. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caiden, G. (1969). “Development Administration Reform.” International Social Science Journal 21(9), 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caiden, G. (1976). “Implementation: The Achilles Heel of Administrative Reform.” In A.F. Leemans (ed.), The Management of Change in Government. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 142–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comfort, L.K. (1986). “International Disaster Assistance in the Mexico City Earthquake.” New World: A Journal of Latin American Studies 1(2), 12–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comfort, L.K. (1989). “The San Salvador Earthquake.” In U. Rosenthal, M.T. Charles, and P. Thart (eds.), Coping with Crisis: The Management of Disasters, Riots, and Terrorism. Springfield, ILL: Charles C. Thomas, pp. 323–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comfort, L.K. (1990). “Turning Conflict into Cooperation: Organizational Designs for Community Response in Disasters.” International Journal of Mental Health 19(1), 89–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comfort, L.K. (1991). “Designing an Interactive, Intelligent, Spatial Information System for International Disaster Assistance.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 9(3), 339–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denhardt, R.B. (1993). Theories of Public Organization, 2nd Edition. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Waal, A., and R. Omaar. (1993). “Doing Harm by Doing Good? The International Relief Effort in Somalia.” Current History 198–202, May.

  • Drabek, Thomas E. (1997). “Following Some Dreams: Recognizing Opportunities, Posting Interesting Questions, and Implementing Alternative Methods.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 15(1), 21–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, Ali. (2001). “Crisis and Emergency Management: An Introduction.” In Ali Farazmand (ed.), Handbook of Crisis and Emergency Management. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, Ali. (1994). “Organizational Theory: An Overview and Appraisal.” In Ali Farazmand (ed.), Modern Organizations: Administrative Theory in Contemporary Society. Wesport, Connecticut: Praeger, pp. 3–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, Ali. (2001). “Global Crisis in Public Service and Administration.” In Ali Faramand (ed.), Handbook of Crisis and Emergency Management. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 111–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, Ali. (2003). “Chaos and Transformation Theories: A Theoretical Analysis with Implications for Organization Theory and Public Management.” Public Organization Review: A Global Journal 3, 339–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (1999). “Globalization and Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 59(6), November/December.

  • Farazmand, A. (ed.) (1991). Handbook of Comparative and Development Administration. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, Christina H., Hugh, Gladwin, and Walter Gillis, Peacock. (2001). “Modeling Hurricane Evacuation Decisions with Ethnographic Methods.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies 19(2), 117–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L.J. (1994). “Managing Human and Natural Disasters in Developing Nations: The Multidimensional Bureaucratic Role.” In Ali Farazmand (ed.), Handbook of Bureaucracy. Marcel Dekker.

  • Heady, F. (2001). Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective, 6th Edition. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, H. (1978). “Issue Networks and Executive Establishment.” In A. King (ed.), The New American Political System. Washington, D.C.: The Enterprise Institute, pp. 27–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J.W. (1990). “Intergovernmental Relations in Mexico and the United States.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 56(3), 403–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-American Development Bank. (1999). Facing the Challenge of Natural Disasters in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, D.C.

  • Jain, R.B. (1976). Contemporary Issues in Indian Administration. Delhi, India: Vishal Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantari, Behrooz. (2001). “Public Management and Natural Disasters: A Case Study of Earthquake Management in Iran.” In Ali Farazmand (ed.), Handbook of Crisis and Emergency Management. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 617–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R.E., and K.D. Pijawka. (1985). “Societal Response to Hazard Events: Comparing Natural and Technological Hazards.” Public Administration Review 45, 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khator, R. (1991). Environment, Development and Politics in India. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, M. (1977). Disasters and Coping Mechanisms in Cakchiquel, Guatemala: The Cultural Context. Dallas, Tex.

  • Koehler, Gustav A. (1995). What Disaster Response Management Can Learn from Chaos Theory. Conference Proceedings of May 18–19.

  • Koehler, Gustav A., Guenther G. Kress, and Randi L. Miller. (2001). “What Disaster Response Management Can Learn from Chaos Theory.” In Ali Farazmand (ed.), Handbook of Crisis and Emergency Management. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 617–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreimer, A., and M. Munasinghe. (1992). Environmental Management and Urban Vulnerability. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohman, E.J.A. (1992). Policies, Institution-Building and Legislation for Land-Use Management in Disaster-Prone Countries, United Nations Disaster Relief Organization News, pp. 8–11, May–June.

  • Mosley, W.H., and P. Cowley. (1991). “The Challenge of World Health.” Population Bulletin 46(4), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunberg, B. (1990). Public Sector Management Issues in Structural Adjustment Lending. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palumbo, D.J. (1988). Public Policy in America: Government in Action. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petak, W. (1985). “Emergency Management: A Challenge for Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 45, 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahmato, D. (1987). Famine and Survival Strategies: A Case Study from Northeast Ethiopia, Addis Ababa University, Institute of Development Research.

  • Schneider, S.K. (1992). “Government Response to Disasters: The Conflict Between Bureaucratic Procedures and Emergent Norms.” Public Administration Review 52(2), 135–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, G.B. (1985). “Human Resource Development for Emergency Management.” Public Administration Review 45, 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomaine, N. (1988). “International Solidarity for Armenian Quake Victims.” United Nations Disaster Relief News, pp. 4–7, November–December.

  • Stallings, Robert A. (1997). “Methods of Disaster Research: Unique or Not?” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disaster 15(1), 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylves, Richard T., and William L. Waugh. (1996). Disaster Management in the U.S. and Canada, 2nd Edition. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tien, H.Y. et al. (1992). “China's Demographic Dilemmas.” Population Bulletin 47(1).

  • United Nations Development Program. (2002). Human Development Report.

  • Van Belle, Douglas A. (1999). “Race and U.S. Foreign Disaster Aid.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 17(3), 339–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldo, D. et al. (1970). Temporal Dimensions of Development Administration. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W.A., and F. DeBalogh. (1985). “Decision Support Systems for Disaster Management.” Public Administration Review 45, 134–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, William Lee. (2001). “Managing Terrorism as an Environmental Hazard.” In Ali Farazmand (ed.), Handbook of Crisis and Emergency Management. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 659–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank. (1991). The Reform of Public Sector Management: Lessons from Experience. Washington, D.C.

  • Zimmerman, R. (1985). “The Relationship of Emergency Management to Governmental Policies on Man-Made Disaster.” Public Administration Review 45, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henderson, L.J. Emergency and Disaster: Pervasive Risk and Public Bureaucracy in Developing Nations. Public Organization Review 4, 103–119 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PORJ.0000031624.46153.b2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PORJ.0000031624.46153.b2

Navigation