Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing protein stabilities during zebrafish embryogenesis

  • Published:
Methods in Cell Science

Abstract

The stabilities of many key proteins are regulated, e.g. via ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation, with important biological consequences. We present a convenient method that allows the analysis and comparison of protein stabilities during embryogenesis using early zebrafish development as a model system. Basically, this method involves ectopic overexpression of epitope-tagged proteins via mRNA injections in one-to-four-cell stage embryos and subsequent protein detection after various time points. Indeed, the protein stability of the ubiquitin ligase RLIM, which is able to autoubiquitinate and target itself for proteasomal degradation, was much shorter when compared to a protein consisting of a Myc epitope-tag and a nuclear localization domain. Thus, this method may be used more widely for the study of developmental protein stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pickart CM (2001). Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination. Annu Rev Biochem 70: 503–533.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bach I, Ostendorff HP (2003). Orchestrating nuclear functions: Ubiquitin sets the rhythm. Trends Biochem Sci 28(4): 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Freiman RN, Tjian R (2003). Regulating the regulators. Lysine modifications make their mark. Cell 112(1): 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hicke L (2001). A new ticket for entry into budding vesicles-ubiquitin. Cell 106(5): 527–530.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kloetzel PM (2001). Antigen processing by the proteasome. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2(3): 179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bach I (2000). The LIM domain: Regulation by association. Mech Dev 91(1- 2): 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hobert O, Westphal H (2000). Functions of LIM-homeobox genes. Trends Genet 16(2): 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ostendorff HP, Peirano RI, Peters MA, Schlüter A, Bossenz M, Scheffner M et al. (2002). Ubiquitination-dependent cofactor exchange on LIM homeodomain transcription factors. Nature 416(6876): 99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF (1995). Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn 203(3): 253–310.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schultheiss TM, Xydas S, Lassar AB (1995). Induction of avian cardiac myogenesis by anterior endoderm. Development 121(12): 4203–4214.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Becker T, Ostendorff HP, Bossenz M, Schlüter A, Becker CG, Peirano RI et al. (2002). Multiple functions of LIM domain-binding CLIM/NLI/Ldb cofactors during zebrafish development. Mech Dev 117(1- 2): 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Becker CG, Schweitzer J, Feldner J, Becker T, Schachner M (2003). Tenascin-R as a repellent guidance molecule for developing optic axons in zebrafish. J Neurosci 23(15): 6232–6237.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bach I, Rodriguez-Esteban C, Carriere C, Bhushan A, Krones A, Rose DW et al. (1999). RLIM inhibits functional activity of LIM homeodomain transcription factors via recruitment of the histone deacetylase complex. Nat Genet 22(4): 394–399.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roth MB, Zahler AM, Stolk JA (1991). A conserved family of nuclear phosphoproteins localized to sites of polymerase II transcription. J Cell Biol 115(3): 587–596.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Becker, T., Bossenz, M., Tursun, B. et al. Comparing protein stabilities during zebrafish embryogenesis. Methods Cell Sci 25, 85–89 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MICS.0000006895.03556.9b

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MICS.0000006895.03556.9b

Navigation