Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Predicting Biological Invasions

  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are various approaches to explain the mechanisms of biological invasions. It is possible (1) to focus on the characteristics of invading species and (2) on those of the ecosystems invaded, (3) to investigate the relationship between these two factors (key–lock approach), or (4) to differentiate the invasion process in time. Each of these approaches may serve to improve the understanding of some aspects of biological invasions, and each of them is in some way suitable for the purpose of predicting invasions. We discuss the usefulness and the limitations of these approaches, focusing on case studies from central Europe. An example of the fourth approach, a model of steps and stages of plant invasions that describes the invasion process in greater detail, illustrates some general limitations in predicting biological invasions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alerternst B (1998) Biologie, Ökologie, Verbreitung und Kontrolle von Reynoutria-Sippen in Baden-Württemberg. Verlag des Institutes für Landespflege der Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, 198 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker HG (1965) Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In: Baker HG and Stebbins GL (eds) The Genetics of Colonizing Species, pp 147–172. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhmer HJ, Heger T and Trepl L (2001) Fallstudien zu gebietsfremden Arten in Deutschland. Case Studies on Alien Species in Germany. Umweltbundesamt, Berlin, 126 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock JH, Child LE, de Waal LC and Wade PM (1995) The invasive nature of Fallopia japonica is enhanced by vegetative regeneration from stem tissues. In: Pyšek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M and Wade PM(eds) Plant Invasions - General Aspects and Special Problems, pp 131–139. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson PL and Case TJ (1986) Overview: Nonequilibrium community theories: Chance, variability, history and coexistence. In: Diamond JM and Case TJ (eds) Community Ecology. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius R, Schultka W and Meyer G (1990) Zum Invasionspotential florenfremder Arten. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie 19: 20–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1987) What makes a community invasible? In: Gray AJ, Crawley MJ and Edwards KR (ed) Colonization, Succession and Stability, pp 429–453. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Daehler CC and Carino DA (2000) Predicting invasive plants: Prospects for a general screening system based on current regional models. Biological Invasions 2: 93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1859) Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection 1998 ed, Wordsworth Editions Ltd, Ware, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis MA, Grime JP and Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: A general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology 88: 528–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Castri F (1990) On invading species and invaded ecosystems: The interplay of historical chance and biological necessity. In: Di Castri F, Hansen AJ and Debussche M (eds) Biological Invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin, pp 3–16. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton CS (1958) The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Methuen & Co. Ltd, London, 181 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin BJ, McAllister AJ and Fahrig L (1999) Predicting invasiveness of plant species based on biological information. Conservation Biology 13(2): 422–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb PJ (1985) Plant populations and vegetation in relation to habitat, disturbance and competition: Problems of generalization. In: White J (eds) The Population Structure of Vegetation, pp 595–621. Dr W. Junk, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzikova M and Maycock PF (1986) The invasion and expansion of three North American species of goldenrod (Solidago canadensis L. sensu lato, S. gigantea AIT. and S. graminifolia (L.) SALISB.) in Poland. Acta Societas Botanicorum Poloniae 55: 367–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Heger T (2000) Biologische Invasionen als komplexe Prozesse: Konsequenzen für den Naturschutz. Natur und Landschaft 75(6): 250–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Heger T (2001) A model for interpreting the process of invasion: Crucial situations favouring special characteristics of invasive species. In: Brundu G, Brock JH, Camarda I, Child LE and Wade PM (eds) Plant Invasions. Species Ecology and Ecosystem Management, pp 3–10. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins SI and Richardson DM (1998) Pine invasions in the southern hemisphere: Modelling interactions between organism, environment and disturbance. Plant Ecology 135: 79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins SI, Richardson DM, Cowling RM and Trinder-Smith TH (1999) Predicting the landscape-scale distribution of alien plants and their threat to plant diversity. Conservation Biology 13(2): 303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäger EJ (1988) Möglichkeiten der Prognose synanthroper Pflanzenausbreitungen. Flora 180: 101–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenis H and Glavac V (1979) Ñber die Konkurrenzfähigkeit des Indischen Springkrautes (Impatiens glandulifera ROYLE) am Fuldaufer bei Kassel. Philippia 4(1): 47–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolar CS and Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: Predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16(4): 199–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kopecký K (1967) Die flußbegleitenden Neophytengesellschaft Impatienti-Solidaginetum in Mittelmähren. Preslia, Praha 39: 151–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I (1995) Time lags in biological invasions with regard to the success and failure of alien species. In: Pyšek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M and Wade PM (eds) Plant Invasions - General Aspects and Special Problems, pp 15–38. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine JM (2000) Species diversity and biological invasions: Relating local process to community pattern. Science 288: 852–854

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levine JM and D'Antonio CM (1999) Elton revisited: A review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87: 15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge DM (1993) Biological invasions: Lessons for ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 133–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack RN (1985) Invading plants: Their potential contribution to population biology. In: White J (ed) Studies in Plant Demography: a Festschrift for John L. Harper, pp 127–141. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack RN (1992) Characteristics of invading plant species. In: Stone CP, Smith CW and Tunison JT (eds) Alien Plant Invasions in Native Ecosystems of Hawaii: Management and Research, pp 42–46. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely JA (ed) (2001) The great reshufflling. Human dimensions of invasive alien species. IUCN Biodiversity Policy Co-ordination Division, Gland, Switzerland

  • Noble IR (1989) Attributes of invaders and the invading process: Terrestrial and vascular plants. In: Drake JA, Mooney HJ, Di Castri F, Groves RH, Kruger FJ, Rejmánek M and Williamson M (eds) Biological Invasions: a Global Perspective, pp 301–313. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P (1991) Heracleum mantegazzianum in the Czech Republik: Dynamics of spreading from the historical perspective. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 26: 439–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek P (1998) Is there a taxonomic pattern to plant invasions? Oikos 82: 282–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M (1989) Invasibility of plant communities. In: Drake JA, Mooney HJ, Di Castri F, Groves RH, Kruger FJ, Rejmánek M and Williamson M (eds) Biological Invasions: a Global Perspective, pp 369–388. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M (1995) What makes a species invasive? In: Pyšek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M and Wade PM (eds) Plant Invasions - General Aspects and Special Problems, pp 3–13. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M and Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77(6): 1655–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD and West CJ (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: Concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions 6: 93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy J (1990) In search of the characteristics of plant invaders. In: Di Castri F, Hansen AJ and Debussche M (eds) Biological Invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin, pp 335–352. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuldes H and Kübler R (1991) Neophyten als Problempflanzen im Naturschutz. Landesamt für Umweltschutz Baden-Württemberg, Karlsruhe, Germany, 16 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiger LA (1997) The status of Fallopia japonica (Reynoutria japonica; Polygonum cuspidatum) in North America. In: Brock JH, Wade PM, Pyšek P and Green DM (eds) Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe, pp 95–102. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Sher AA and Hyatt LA (1999) The disturbed resource-flux invasions matrix: A framework for patterns of plant invasion. Biological Invasions 1(2-3): 107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CS, Lonsdale WM and Fortune J (1999) When to ignore advice: invasion prediction and decision theory. Biological Invasions 1(1): 89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starfield AM (1997) A pragmatic approach to modeling for wildlife management. Journal of Wildlife Management 61(2): 261–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Symstad AJ (2000) A test of the effects of functional group richness and composition on grassland invasibility. Ecology 81(1): 99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trepl L (1984) Ñber Impatiens parviflora DC. als Agriophyt in Mitteleuropa. J. Cramer, Vaduz, Lichtenstein, 400 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Trepl L (1990) Zum Problem der Resistenz von Pflanzengesellschaften gegen biologische Invasionen. Verhandlungen des Berliner Botanischen Vereins 8: 195–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Trepl L and Sukopp H (1993) Zur Bedeutung der Introduktion und Naturalisation von Pflanzen und Tieren für die Zukunft der Artenvielfalt. Rundgespräche der Kommission für Ökologie der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 6: 127–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M and Fitter A (1996) The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77(6): 1661–1666

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology, Landscape Ecology, Technische Universität München, Am Hochanger 6, 85350, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany

    Tina Heger & Ludwig Trepl

Authors
  1. Tina Heger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ludwig Trepl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heger, T., Trepl, L. Predicting Biological Invasions. Biological Invasions 5, 313–321 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BINV.0000005568.44154.12

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BINV.0000005568.44154.12

Search

Navigation