Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty Based on the Propagation of Distributions Using Monte Carlo Simulation

  • Published:
Measurement Techniques Aims and scope

Abstract

The uncertainty associated with a value of some quantity is widely recognized throughout scientific disciplines as a quantitative measure of the reliability of that value. In addition, measurement uncertainty is increasingly seen as essential in quality assurance for industry. The Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) provides internationally agreed recommendations for the evaluation of uncertainties. This paper outlines the current situation of uncertainty evaluation in the context of international norms and arrangements. It describes the basic ideas and concepts that underlie the GUM and serves as a brief tutorial on methods for evaluating measurement uncertainty in a manner consistent with the GUM. It recommends an approach to evaluating measurement uncertainty based on the propagation of distributions using Monte Carlo simulation. An example is presented to illustrate Monte Carlo simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. ISO/IEC 17025: General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories, International Organization for Standardization (1999).

  2. Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM): http://www.bipm.fr/pdf/KPMG_report.pdf

  3. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, International Organization for Standardization (1995).

  4. Le Systèm International d'Unités (SI), 7e édition, Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) (1998).

  5. EA-4/02: Expression of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration, European co-operation for Accreditation. See under “documents” on http://www.european-accreditation.org/

  6. W. Wöger, “Information-based probability density function for a quantity,” Izmer. Tekh., No. 9, 3–9 (2003).

  7. M. G. Cox, M. P. Dainton, A. B. Forbes, P. M. Harris, H. Schwenke, B. R. L. Siebert, and W. Wöger, “Use of Monte Carlo Simulation for uncertainty evaluation in metrology,” Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology, Series of Advances in Mathematics for Applied Sciences, ISBN/ISSN 981–0244–94–0, 57, 93–105 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. R. L. Siebert, “Berechnung der Messunsicherheit mit der Monte-Carlo-Methode,” PTB-Mitteilungen, 111, 323–337 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. M. Hammersley and D. C. Handscomb, Monte Carlo Methods, Methuen's Monographs on Applied Probability and Statistics, Methuen, London (1964).

  10. J. R. Rice, Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis, Duxbury Press, Belmont, Ca, USA, second edition (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. G. Cox, M. P. Dainton, and P. M. Harris, “Software specifications for uncertainty evaluation and associated statistical analysis,” Technical Report CMSC 10/01, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK (2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cox, M., Harris, P. & Siebert, B.RL. Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty Based on the Propagation of Distributions Using Monte Carlo Simulation. Measurement Techniques 46, 824–833 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:METE.0000008439.82231.ad

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:METE.0000008439.82231.ad

Navigation