Abstract
The ability to recognise kin requires the individual to possess a variety of abilities. Individuals must produce a cue which indicates relatedness, they must process this cue to determine relatedness and then must act on this cue. Research has concentrated on the first and final stage of this process, i.e., the cues of kinship and kin correlated behaviour. Little attention has been paid to how individuals process cues to determine relatedness. This paper discusses how individuals ‘recognise’ kin, the exhibition of kin correlated behaviour and considers the role of the MHC in these processes. Two broad theories have emerged to explain how individuals recognise their kin: either a recognition gene(s) or some experiential mechanism. In mammals there is no evidence to suggest that recognition (the processing of the cue) is under genetic control but rather is the result of experience, learning about related individuals during development. Moreover studies on kin recognition in the domestic dog suggest that all kin are not recognised by the same process but different classes of kin, parents, siblings may well be recognised using different means. Studies of kin correlated behaviour suggest that the behaviour exhibited towards kin by Mongolian gerbils is mediated by the environment. Factors of environmental familiarity, sex and developmental age all affect the response of individuals to kin and non‐kin. In these situations the ability to recognise kin does not change but the exhibition of kin correlated behaviour changes according to environmental conditions. These studies indicate that kin recognition may not be the ‘unified’ process previously thought and thus any explanations of the proximate and ultimate causation of kin recognition need to encompass this complexity. The question remains of whether the MHC is complex enough to do so.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, R.M., K.J. Gerhardt & A.J.M. Peters, 1995. Transmission of sound and vibration to the fetus, pp. 315-330 in Fetal Development. A Psychobiological Perspective, edited by J.P. Lecanuet, W.P. Fifer, N.A. Krasnegor and W.P. Smotherman. LEA, Hillsdale.
Barnard, C.J., 1991. Kinship and social behaviour: the trouble with relatives. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 310-312.
Bateson, P.P.G., 1979. How do sensitive periods arise and what are they for? Anim. Behav. 27: 470-486.
Bateson, P.P.G., 1981. Control of sensitivity to the environment during development, pp. 432-453 in Behavioral Development. The Bielefield Interdisciplinary Project, edited by K. Immelmann, G.W. Barlow, L. Petrinovich and M. Main. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Boyse, E.A., G.K. Beauchamp, K. Yamazaki & J. Bard, 1991. Genetic components of kin recognition in mammals, pp. 148- 161 in Kin Recognition, edited by P.G. Hepper. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Brown, J.L., 1983. Some paradoxical goals of cells and organisms: the role of the MHC, pp. 111-124 in Ethical Questions in Brain and Behavior, edited by D.W. Pfaff. Springer, New York.
Brown, J.L. & A. Eklund, 1994. Kin recognition and the major histocompatibility complex: an integrative review. Am. Natur. 143: 435-461.
Byers, J.A. & M. Bekoff, 1986. What does ‘kin recognition’ mean. Ethology 72: 342-345.
Cleland, J.A., 1993. Parent-offspring interactions in the Mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus. PhD Thesis, The Queen's University of Belfast.
Colgan, P., 1983. Comparative Social Recognition. Wiley, New York.
Dawkins, R., 1982. The Extended Phenotype. W.H. Freeman, Oxford.
DeCasper, A.J. & W.P. Fifer, 1980. Of human bonding: newborns prefer their mothers' voices. Science 208: 1174-1176.
Fletcher, D.J.C. & C.D. Michener, 1987. Kin Recognition in Animals. Wiley, Chichester.
Grafen, A., 1990. Do animals really recognise kin? Anim. Behav. 39: 42-55.
Grau, H.J., 1982. Kin recognition in white-footed deermice (Peromyscus leucopus). Anim. Behav. 30: 497-505.
Grobstein, P., 1988. On beyond neuronal specificity: problems in going from cells to networks and from networks to behavior. Adv. Neural Behav. Dev. 3: 1-58.
Hamilton, W.D., 1964a. The genetical evolution of social behaviour I. J. Theo. Biol. 7: 1-16.
Hamilton, W.D., 1964b. The genetical evolution of social behaviour II. J. Theo. Biol. 7: 17-52.
Hepper, P.G., 1983. Sibling recognition in the rat. Anim. Behav. 31: 1177-1191.
Hepper, P.G., 1986a. Can recognition genes for kin recognition exist? pp. 31-35 in The Individual and Society, edited by L. Passera and J.-P. Lachaud. Privat, IEC, Toulouse.
Hepper, P.G., 1986b. Kin recognition: functions and mechanisms. A review. Biol. Rev. 61: 63-93.
Hepper, P.G., 1987. The amniotic fluid: an important priming role in kin recognition. Anim. Behav. 35: 1343-1346.
Hepper, P.G., 1990. Fetal olfaction, pp. 282-288 in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates V, edited by D.W. Macdonald, D. Muller-Schwarze and S.E. Natynzcuk. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hepper, P.G., 1991a. Kin Recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hepper, P.G., 1991b. Recognizing kin: ontogeny and classification, pp. 259-288 in Kin Recognition, edited by P.G. Hepper. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hepper, P.G., 1992a. Fetal psychology. An embryonic science, pp. 129-156 in Fetal Behaviour, edited by J.G. Nijhuis. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hepper, P.G., 1992b. Comparative prenatal learning and behaviour. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 44B (special issue).
Hepper, P.G., 1994. Long-term retention of kinship recognition established during infancy in the domestic dog. Behavioural Processes 33: 3-14.
Holmes, W.G. & P.W. Sherman, 1983. Kin recognition in animals. American Scientist 71: 46-55.
Kareem, A.M. & C.J. Barnard, 1982. The importance of kinship and familiarity in social interactions between mice. Anim. Behav. 30: 594-601.
Lawlor, D.A., J. Zemmour, P.D. Ennis & P. Parham, 1990. Evolution of class 1MHCgenes and proteins: from natural selection to thymic selection. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 8: 23-63.
Lawson, J.W. & D. Renouf, 1987. Bonding and weaning in Harbor seals, Phoca vitulina. J. Mammal. 68: 445-449.
Nei, M. & A.L. Hughes, 1990. Polymorphism and evolution of the major histocompatibility complex loci in mammals, pp. 222-247 in Evolution at the Molecular Level, edited by R.K. Selander, A.G. Clark and T.S, Whittam. Sinauer, Mass.
Porter, R.H., J.A. Matochik & J.W. Makin, 1983. Evidence for phenotype matching in spinymice (Acomys cahirinus). Anim. Behav. 31: 978-984.
Porter, R.H., 1988. The ontogeny of sibling recognition in rodents: superfamily Muroidea. Behav. Genet. 18: 483-494.
Querlen, D., X. Renard, C. Boutteville & G. Crepin, 1989. Hearing by the human fetus? Seminars in Perinatology 13: 409-420.
Ridley, M. & A. Grafen, 1981. Are green beard genes outlaws? Anim. Behav. 29: 954-955.
Schaal, B., P. Orgeur & C. Arnould, 1995. Olfactory preferences in newborn lambs: possible influence of prenatal experience. Behaviour 132: 351-365.
Stuart, R.J., 1991. Kin recognition as a functional concept. Anim. Behav. 41: 1093-1094.
Waldman, B. 1987. Mechanisms of kin recognition. J. Theo. Biol. 128: 159-185.
Yamazaki, K., G.K. Beauchamp, D. Kupniewski, J. Bard, L. Thomas & E.A. Boyse, 1988. Familial imprinting determines H-2 selective mating preferences. Science 240: 1331-1332.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hepper, P.G., Cleland, J. Developmental aspects of kin recognition. Genetica 104, 199–205 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026477724836
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026477724836