Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Agency and Voice: The Semantics of the Semitic Templates

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Semitic templates systematically encode two dimensions of verb meaning: (a) agency, the thematic role of the verb’s external argument, and (b) voice. The assumption that this form-meaning correspondence is mediated by syntax allows the parallel compositional construction of the form and the meaning of a verb from the forms and the meanings of its root and template. The root and its arguments are optionally embedded under a light verb v which introduces the agent (Hale and Keyser 1993; Kratzer 1994). But this is only the unmarked case, which, in Semitic, is encoded by the simple templates. Two dimensions of markedness are introduced by two additional types of syntactic heads: (a) agency heads, which modify agency and are morphologically realized as the intensive and causative templates, and (b) voice heads, which modify voice and are morphologically realized as the passive and middle templates. Causative and middle morphemes are thus accounted for within a unified system, which, first, explains their affinity in language in general (both are found crosslinguistically as markers of transitivity alternations), and which, moreover, sheds new light on problems in the interface of semantics and morphology. One problem is the impossibility, mostly ignored in linguistic theory, of deriving the semantics of middle verbs from that of the corresponding transitive verbs. The second is explaining the identity found crosslinguistically between middle and reflexive morphology. The third is determining the grammatical function of the causee in causative constructions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aissen, Judith: 1979, The Syntax of Causative Constructions. Garland Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aissen, Judith and Jorge Hankamer: 1980, ‘Lexical Extension and Grammatical Transformation’, in BLS 6.

  • Alsina, Alex: 1992, ‘On the Argument Structure of Causatives’, Linguistic Inquiry 23, 517–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsina, Alex: 1996, The Role of Argument Structure in Grammar: Evidence from Romance. CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsina, Alex and Smita Joshi: 1991, ‘Parameters in Causative Constructions’, in CLS 27, pp. 1–15. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arad, Maya: 1998, VP-Structure and the Syntax-Lexicon Interface. PhD dissertation, University College, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aranovich, RaÚl: 2000, ‘Split Transitivity and Reflexives in Spanish’, Probus 12, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aranovich, RaÚl: 2002, ‘Restructuring in HPSG and the Lexical Semantics of Causation: Evidence from Spanish’, in V. Di Tommaso and Alessandro Lenci (eds.), Meaning and Computation, Editore Dell’Orso, Alessandria, in press.

  • Aronoff, Mark: 1994, Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark: 1988, Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batel, Outi: 1989, Phonology and Word Structure in Modern Hebrew. PhD dissertation, UCLA.

  • Batel, Outi: 1994, ‘Stem Modification and Cluster Transfer in Modern Hebrew’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12, 571–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergsträsser, Gotthelf: 1983, Introduction to the Semitic Languages (transl. Peter T. Daniels). Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake, Ind.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Ruth: 1978, Modern Hebrew Structure. University Publishing Projects, Tel Aviv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit: 1994, ‘On the Projection of Arguments’, in E. Benedicto and J. Runner (eds.), Functional Projections (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 17), pp. 19–47. GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit: 1998, ‘Deriving Passives without Theta Grids’, in S. Lapointe, D. Brentari, and D. Farrell (eds.), Morphological Interfaces, pp. 60–99. CLSI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit and Yosef Grodzinsky: 1986, ‘Syntactic Cliticization and Lexical Cliticization: The Case of Hebrew Dative Clitics’, in H. Borer (ed.), The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics: Syntax and Semantic 19, pp. 175–217. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan and Jonni Kanerva: 1989, ‘Locative Inversion in Chicheŵa: A Case Study of Factorization in Grammar’, Linguistic Inquiry 20, 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, Anne-Marie and Elizabeth Ritter: 1991, ‘A Non-Unified Analysis of Agentive Verbs’, Proceedings of WCCFL 10, pp. 53–64. CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centineo, Giulia: 1995, ‘The Distribution of si in Italian Transitive/Inchoative Pairs’, in SALT 5, pp. 54–71. CLC Publications, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro: 1989, ‘A Semantics for Unaccusatives and Its Syntactic Consequences’, ms., Cornell University.

  • Cinque, Guglielmo: 1988, ‘On Si Constructions and the Theory of Arb’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 521–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1970, ‘Remarks on Nominalization’, in R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, pp. 184–221. Ginn and Co., Waltham, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Peter: 1976, ‘A Causative Construction in Modern Hebrew: Theoretical Implications’, in P. Cole (ed.), Studies in Modern Hebrew Syntax and Semantics, pp. 99–128. North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Peter and S. N. Shridhar: 1977, ‘Clause Union and Relational Grammar: Evidence from Hebrew and Kannada’, Linguistic Inquiry 8, 700–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, William: 1990, ‘Possible Verbs and the Structure of Events’, in S. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Meaning and Prototypes, pp. 48–73. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald: 1971, ‘Agency’, reprinted in Essays on Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980, pp. 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Henry: 2000, ‘Salish Evidence on the Causative-Inchoative Alternation’, in M. A. Pöchtrager (ed.), Morphologica 96. Holland Academic Graphics, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiSciullo, Anne-Marie and Edwin Williams: 1987, On the Definition of Word. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen: 1988, ‘Impersonal se Constructions in Romance and the Passivization of Unergatives’, Linguistic Inquiry 29, 399–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: 1976, ‘Montague Grammar and the Lexical Decomposition of Causative Verbs’, in B. H. Partee (ed.), Montague Grammar, pp. 201–246. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: 1991, ‘Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection’, Language 67(3), 547–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, Jeanne and Eduardo Raposo: 1986, ‘Clause Union, the Stratal Uniqueness Law and the Chômeur Relation’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4, 295–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane: 1982, ‘On the Lexical Representation of Romance Reflexive Clitics’, in J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, pp. 87–184. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane: 1990, Argument Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Kenneth and Samuel Jay Keyser: 1993, ‘On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations’, in K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20, pp. 53–109. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Kenneth and Alec Marantz: 1993, ‘Distributed Morphology’, in K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20, pp. 111–176. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haspelmath, Martin: 1993, ‘More on the Typology of Inchoative/Causative Verb Alternations’, in B. Comrie and M. Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and Transitivity, pp. 87–120. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene, Howard Lasnik, and Robert May: 1991, ‘Reciprocity and Plurality’, Linguistic Inquiry 22, 63–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James: 1985, ‘On Semantics’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, W. M.: 1985, ‘Morphosyntactic Transitivity and Semantic Markedness’, in CLS 21, pp. 89–104. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katada, Fusa: 1997, ‘Experience versus Non-Experience Asymmetries in the Causative System’, in J. R. Black and V. Motapanyane (eds.), Clitics, Pronouns and Movement, pp. 132–150. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard: 1975, French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, Paul: 1973, ‘“Elsewhere” in Phonology’, in S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, pp. 93–106. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika: 1994, ‘The Event Argument and the Semantics of Voice’, ms., University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda, S.-Y.: 1965, ‘Causative Forms in Japanese’, Foundations of Language 1, 30–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George: 1970, Irregularity in Syntax. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, Idan: 1999, ‘Possessor Raising and the Structure of VP’, Lingua 107, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, Idan: 2002, ‘The Locative Syntax of Experiencer’, paper presented at the 18th annual meeting of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, Bar Ilan University.

  • Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport: 1995, Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David K.: 1973, ‘Causation’, The Journal of Philosophy 70, 556–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Yafei: 1990, ‘X°-binding and Verb-Incorporation’, Linguistic Inquiry 21, 399–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Yafei, 1995, ‘The Thematic Hierarchy and Causativity’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13, 255–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipinski, Edward: 1997, Semitic Languages: Outline of a Comparative Grammar. Peeters, Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, Alec: 1984, On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, Alec: 1985, ‘Lexical Decomposition vs. Affixes as Syntactic Constituents’, in Papers from the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity at CLS 21, pp. 154–171. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, Alec: 1997, ‘No Escape from Syntax: Don't Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon’, in UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics 4.2, pp. 201–225. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John: 1981, ‘A Prosodic Theory of Nonconcatenative Morphology’, Linguistic Inquiry 12(3) 373–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, James D.: 1968, ‘The Role of Semantics in Grammar’, in E. Bach and R. Harms (eds.), Universals of Linguistic Theory, pp. 124–169. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Philip H.: 1992, Clitics and Constituents in Phrase Structure Grammar. Garland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Philip H. and Ivan A. Sag: 1997, ‘French Clitic Movement without Clitics or Movement’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15, 573–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, John: 1991, Reduced Constructions in Spanish, PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedyalkov, V. P. and G. G. Silnitsky: 1973, ‘The Typology of Morphological Causatives’, in F. Kiefer (ed.), Trends in Soviet Theoretical Linguistics, pp. 1–32. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Terence: 1990, Events in the Semantics of English. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara: 1976, ‘Some Transformational Extensions of Montague Grammar’, in B. H. Partee (ed.), Montague Grammar, pp. 51–76. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David: 1987, ‘Binding Problems with Experiencer Verbs’, Linguistic Inquiry 18, 126–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David: 1995, Zero Zyntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, Carl and Ivan A. Sag: 1994, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. CSLI Publications and The University of Chicago Press, Stanford and Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, James: 1995, The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Beth Levin: 1998, ‘Building Verb Meanings’, in M. Butt and W. Geuder (eds.), The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, pp. 97–134. CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Beth Levin: 2000, ‘Classifying Single Argument Verbs’, in P. Coopmans, M. Everaert, and J. Grimshaw (eds.), Lexical Specification and Insertion, pp. 269–304. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, Tanya: 1996, ‘Syntactic Effects of Lexical Operation: Reflexives and Unaccusatives’, OTS Working Papers in Linguistics, University of Utrecht.

  • Reinhart, Tanya and Tal Siloni: 2003, ‘Against the Unaccusative Analysis of Reflexives’, in A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou, and M. Everaert (eds.), The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Studies on the Syntax-Lexicon Interface. Oxford University Press, to appear.

  • Rosen, Sara Thomas: 1990, Argument Structure and Complex Predicates. Garland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, John R.: 1972, ‘Act’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 70–126.

  • Reidel, Dordrecht. Sells, Peter, Annie Zaenen, and Draga Zec: 1987, ‘Reflexivization Variation: Relations between Syntax, Semantics and Lexical Structure’, in M. Iida, S. Wexler, and D. Zec (eds.), Working Papers in Grammatical Theory and Discourse Structure, pp. 169–238. CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, Mandy: 1996, ‘The Template Hitpa'el Decomposed: On the Derivation and Function of the Hebrew Template Hitpa'el’, in E. Doron and S. Wintner (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, pp. 143–167. Akademon, Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stechow, Arnim: 1995, ‘Lexical Decomposition in Syntax’, in U. Egli, P. E. Pause, C. Schwartze, A. von Stechow, and G. Wienold (eds.), Lexical Knowledge in the Organization of Language, pp. 81–117. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullendorff, Edward: 1971, ‘Comparative Semitics’, in C. T. Hodge (ed.), Afroasiatic: A Survey, pp. 27–39. Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ussishkin, Adam: 2000, The Emergence of Fixed Prosody, PhD Dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valin, Robert D. and R. J. LaPolla: 1997, Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valin, Robert D. and David P. Wilkins: 1996, ‘The Case for “Effector”: Case Roles, Agents and Agency Revisited’, in M. Shibatani and S. A. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical Construction, pp. 289–322. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennemann, Theo: 1998, ‘Andromeda and the Apples of the Hesperides’, in Proceedings of the Ninth Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference,1997 (Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Series 28).

  • Wehrli, Eric: 1986, ‘On Some Properties of the French Clitic se’, in H. Borer (ed.), The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics: Syntax and Semantics 19. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, Paul: 1990, The Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past. Otto Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin: 1981, ‘Argument Structure and Morphology’, The Linguistic Review 1, 81–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zribi-Hertz, Anne: 1987, ‘La réflexivité ergative en français moderne’, Le Français Moderne 55(1), 23–52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of English, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91905, Jerusalem, Israel E-mail

    Edit Doron

Authors
  1. Edit Doron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doron, E. Agency and Voice: The Semantics of the Semitic Templates. Natural Language Semantics 11, 1–67 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023021423453

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023021423453

Keywords

Search

Navigation