Skip to main content
Log in

An Increased Number of Replaced Embryos Counteracts the Adverse Effect of Hydrosalpinges on IVF/ET Outcome

  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: The relationship between the number of replaced embryos and the outcome of IVF-ET in patients with hydro-salpinges was investigated in a retrospective, nonrandom-ized study performed at a governmental IVF center.

Methods: One hundred patients undergoing 161 IVF cycles ending in embryo transfer were studied. Previously diagnosed hydrosalpinges were evident on transvaginal sonography in 48 cycles in 26 patients (group I) and not evident in 15 cycles in 10 patients (group II). The control group included 98 cycles in 64 patients with tubal lesions other than hydrosalpinx. Pregnancy and implantation rates were the main outcome measures.

Results: Replacement of three or fewer embryos was associated with significantly lower implantation rates in group I compared to controls. Despite the difference in the rank of IVF trial within the same group, significantly lower implantation rates were found when four or fewer embryos were replaced in the control group and not in group I.

Conclusion: An increased number of replaced embryos counteracts the adverse effect of hydrosalpinges on IVF/ ET outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Strandell A, Waldenstrm U, Nilsson L, Hamberger L: Hydrosalpinx reduces in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod 1994;9:861–863

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen AN, Yue Z, Meng FJ, Petersen K: Low implantation rate after in-vitro fertilization in patients with hydrosalpinges diagnosed by ultrasonography. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1935–1938

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vandromme J, Chasse E, Lejeune B, Rysselberge MV, Delvigne A, Leroy F: Hydrosalpinges in in vitro fertilization: an unfavourable prognostic feature. Hum Reprod 1995;10:576–579

    Google Scholar 

  4. Katz E, Akman MA, Damewood MD, Garcia JE: Deleterious effect of the presence of hydrosalpinx on implantation and pregnancy rates with in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1996;66:122–125

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fleming C, Hull MGR: Impaired implantation after in vitro fertilisation treatment associated with hydrosalpinges. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:268–272

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI, Riad R: Fluid accumulation of the uterine cavity before embryo transfer: A possible hindrance for implantation. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1991;8:1157–1159

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mukherjee T, Copperman AB, McCaffery C, Cook CA, Bustillo M, Obasaju MF: Hydrosalpinx fluid has embryotoxic effects on murine embryogenesis: A case for prophylactic salpingectomy. Fertil Steril 1996;66:851–853

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lin Tan S, Royston P, Campbell S, Jacobs HS, Betts J, Mason B, Edwards RG: Cumulative conception and livebirth rates after in vitro fertilization. Lancet 1992;339:1390–1394

    Google Scholar 

  9. van Kooij RJ, Looman CWN, Habbema JDF, Doralnd M, te Velde ER: Age-dependent decrease in embryo implantation rate after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1996;66:769–775

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nijs M, Geerts L, van Roosendaal E, Segal-Bertin G, Vanderz-walmen P, Schoysman R: Prevention of multiple pregnancies in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 1993;59:1245–1250

    Google Scholar 

  11. Azem F, Yaron Y, Amit A, Yovel I, Barak Y, Peyser MR, David MP, Lessing JB: Transfer of six or more embryos improves success rates in patients with repeated in vitro fertilization failures. Fertil Steril 1995;63:1043–1046

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hill GA, Herbert CM, Fleischer AC, Webster BW, Maxon WS, Wenz AC: Enlargement of hydrosalpinges during ovarian stimulation protocols for in vitro fertilization and embryo replacement. Fertil Steril 1986;45:883–885

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tessler FN, Perrella RR, Fleischer AC, Grant EG: Endovaginal sonographic diagnosis of dilated fallopian tubes. AJR 1989;153:523–525

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blazar AS, Alexander K, Seifer DB, Frishman GF, Wheeler CA, Haning RV: Absence of an effect of hydrosalpinx on pregnancy rate in in vitro fertilization (IVF) rates (abstract). Fifty-First Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Seattle, WA, 1995, p 220

  15. Sharara FI, Queenan JT Jr, Springer RS, Scoccia H, Scommegna A: Hydrosalpinx is not associated with poor pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization (abstract). Fifty-First Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Seattle, WA, 1995, pp 115–116

  16. Verhulst G, Vandersteen N, van-Steirteghem AC, Devroey P: Bilateral salpingectomy does not compromise ovarian stimulation in an in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod 1994;9:624–628

    Google Scholar 

  17. Russell JB, Rodriguez Z, Komins JI: The use of transvaginal ultrasound to aspirate bilateral hydrosalpinges prior to in vitro fertilization: A case report. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1991;8:213–215

    Google Scholar 

  18. Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Sattar MA, Awad MM, Amin Y: Transvaginal ultrasonic needle guided aspiration of pelvic inflammatory cystic masses before ovulation induction for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1990;53:311–314

    Google Scholar 

  19. Craft I, Al-Shawaf T: Limiting the number of oocytes and embryos transferred in GIFT and IVF. BMJ 1991;303:185

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abd-El-Maeboud, K.H.I., Khalifa, E.AD.M. & El-Hussein, ES. An Increased Number of Replaced Embryos Counteracts the Adverse Effect of Hydrosalpinges on IVF/ET Outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 15, 22–26 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022522204277

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022522204277

Navigation