Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of State Maternal and Child Health Programs in the Issue of Newborn Discharge

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: Since dramatically shortened newborn hospitalization has shifted the focus of care from the hospital, a central policy question has become how to assure a system of care that extends into the home and community. The objective of this study was to examine the role of the state Maternal and Child Health Title V programs in the assessment of the issue of newborn discharge, the development of policies, and the assurance of appropriate care. Method: The director or their designee in all 50 states and the District of Columbia participated in a structured telephone interview lasting 30–60 minutes. Results: Twenty-eight states reported new or previously implemented mandates for 48 hours of private insurance coverage for postpartum hospitalization. Only 6 states reported mandates concerning private insurance coverage of inpatient services, but 20 states reported mandates for postdischarge services. In the assessment function, only 18 maternal and child health (MCH) programs reported that they had undertaken specific studies on the effects of discharge timing in their states. In policy development, 18 of the 51 respondents reported that the MCH program initiated newborn discharge discussions, 23 reported that the agency participated in discussions, and 10 indicated that they did not participate. In assurance, 29 programs reported that they had taken action to provide technical assistance to local communities in developing follow-up systems. The relationship between the performance of core functions and the development of specific discharge policies in the state was minimal. Conclusions: The MCH programs appear to have played varied, but often limited, roles in the development of discharge policies. It is essential for MCH programs to engage actively in the policy-making process. But in the political environment surrounding newborn discharge policy, where laws and regulations consistent with the well-being of infants and mothers were being enacted, the limited MCH program roles may have been appropriate. Arguing against this conclusion, however, is that only 15 programs believed they had been effective and only 19 were satisfied with the discharge policies in their states, which suggests that a more proactive role may be necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in length of stay for hospital deliveries-United States, 1970–92. MMWR 1995;44:335–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shell E. The hospital hustle. Parenting (February) 1990;57–61.

  3. Annas GJ. Women and children first. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1647–51.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Declerq E, Simmes D. The politics of “drive through deliveries”: Putting postpartum discharge on the legislative agenda. Milbank Quarterly 1997;75:175–202.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Matherlee KR, Par, MJ, Sonosky CA. Shorter maternity stays and minimum stay laws: What do they mean for mothers and infants? Health Policy and Child Health — Special Report 1996;Winter:1–4.

  6. Kessel W, Kiely M, Nora AH, Sumaya CV. Early discharge: In the end it is judgment. Pediatrics 1995;96:739–42.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Hospital stay for healthy term newborns. Pediatrics 1995;96:788–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs. AMCHP position paper on postpartum hospital discharge of mothers and Infants. March 1996.

  9. Dievler A, Grason HA, Guyer B. MCH functions framework: A guide to the role of government in maternal and child health in the 21st century. Maternal and Child Health Journal 1997;1:5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Newborns' and Mothers' Health Protection Act of 1996. Public Law 104–204 (Title VI), September 26, 1996.

  11. Kearney S. Hospital length-of-stay for obstetrical care. CRS report for Congress. October 1996:1–6.

  12. National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health. Legislative Base: Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant. Washington, DC: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kun KE, Muir E. Influences on state legislators. Public Health Rep 1997;112:276–83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lewis H. Margolis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Margolis, L.H., Gay, K. & Humphrey, A.D. The Role of State Maternal and Child Health Programs in the Issue of Newborn Discharge. Matern Child Health J 2, 45–54 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021845609606

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021845609606

Navigation