Skip to main content
Log in

Mainstreaming: A case for optimism and cynicism

  • Published:
Feminist Legal Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper seeks to evaluate the concept of mainstreaming against a range of feminist critiques of laws and legal systems and to examine the case for the pursuit of feminist politics through mainstreaming strategies. It begins, in section two, by identifying theme sin existing mainstreaming literature, and then in section three considers the potential of mainstreaming to tackle the causes o fine quality. In particular it questions whether mainstreaming can address the patriarchal nature of laws and legal systems and the essentialising tendencies of law, and whether mainstreaming can effectively tackle market-driven inequality. A final section considers the conditions under which feminists might consider engagement with mainstreaming and the limits of such strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beveridge, F., Nott, S. Mainstreaming: A case for optimism and cynicism. Feminist Legal Studies 10, 299–311 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021288101039

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021288101039

Navigation