Abstract
In the December 2000 issue of the Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, we published a set of papers presenting secondary analyses of the Multimodal Treatment Study of ADHD (MTA), and R. A. Barkley (2000) provided a commentary. A critique of the design of the study (MTA Cooperative Group, 1999) was presented based on a theoretical perspective of a “behavioral inhibition” deficit that has been hypothesized as the core deficit of ADHD (R. A. Barkley, 1997). The commentary questioned the design and analysis of the MTA in terms of (1) the empirical criteria for selection of components of behavioral (Beh) intervention, (2) the effectiveness of the Beh intervention, (3) the methods for analyses at the group and individual level, (4) implications of the MTA findings for clinical practice, (5) the role of genetics in response to treatment, and (6) the lack of a nontreatment control group. In this response, we relate the content of the papers to the commentary, (1) by reviewing the selection criteria for the Beh treatment, as outlined by K. C. Wells, W. E. Pelham, et al. (2000), (2) by addressing the myth that the MTA Beh treatment was ineffective (Pelham, 1999), (3) by describing the use of analyses at the level of the individual participant, as presented by J. S. March et al. (2000) and W. E. Pelham et al. (2000) as well as elsewhere by J. M. Swanson et al. (2001) and C. K. Conners et al. (2001), (4) by relating some of the suggestions from the secondary analyses about clinically relevant factors such as comorbidity (as presented by J. S. March et al., 2000) and family and parental characteristics (as presented by B. Hoza et al., 2000, S. P. Hinshaw et al., 2000, and K. C. Wells, J. N. Epstein, et al., 2000), (5) by discussing the statistical concept of heritability and the lack of a significant difference in the presence of ADHD symptoms in parents of the MTA families compared to parents in the classmate-control families (as presented by J. N. Epstein, et al., 2000), and (6) by acknowledging that an ethically necessary weakness of the MTA design is that it did not include a no-treatment control group. We discuss the use of secondary analyses to suggest how, when, and for what subgroups effectiveness of the Beh treatment may have been manifested. Finally, we invite others to use the large and rich data set that will soon be available in the public domain, to perform secondary analyses to mine the meaning of the MTA and to evaluate theories of ADHD and response to treatments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abikoff, H., & Hechtman, L. (1994). Methylphenidate and multimodal treatment for ADHD. In B. Geller (Chair), Advanced topics in psychopharmacology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York.
Arnold, L. E., Abikoff, H., Cantwell, D. P., et al. (1997). National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Multimodality Treatment Study of Children with ADHD (the MTA). Archives of General Psychiatry, 54, 865-870.
Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 65-94.
Barkley, R. A. (1999). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. In E. J. Mash & D. A. Wolfe (Eds.), Abnormal child psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Barkley, R. A. (2000). Commentary on the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 595-599.
Boyle, M. H., Jadad, A. R., & Racine, Y. (1999). Applying lessons from large trials to the MTA study. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 44, x-y.
Conners, C. K., Epstein, J. N., March, J. S., et al. (2001). Multimodal treatment of ADHD in the MTA: An alternative outcome analysis. Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 159-167.
Epstein, J. N., Conners, C. K., Erhardt, et al. (2000). Familial Aggregation of ADHD Characteristics. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 585-594.
Gibbons, R., Hedecker, D., Waternaux, C., & Davis, J. (1988). Random regression models: A Comprehensive approach to the analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data. Psychopharmacological Bulletin, 24, 438-443.
Gibbons, R. D., Hedeker, D. R., Elkin, I., et al. (1993). Some conceptual and statistical issues in analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 739-750.
Haldane, J. B. S. (1946). The interaction of nature and nurture. Annals of Eugenics, 13, 197-205.
Hinshaw, S. P., Owens, E. B., Wells, K. C., et al. (2000). Family processes and treatment outcome in the MTA: Negative/ineffective discipline parenting practices in relation to multimodal treatment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 555-568.
Hoza, B., Owen, J. S., Pelham, W. E., et al. (2000). Parent cognitions as predictors of child treatment response in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 569-583.
Jacobson, N. S., Roberts, L. J., Berns, S. B., & McGlinchey, J. B. (1999). Methods for defining and determining the clinical significance of treatment effects: Description, application, and alternatives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 300-307.
Jensen, P. (1999). Facts vs fancies concerning the MTA. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 975-980.
March, J. S., Swanson, J. M., Arnold, L. E., et al. (2000). Anxiety as a predictor and outcome variable in the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD (MTA). Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 527-541.
MTA Co-operative Group. (1999). A 14-month randomized clinical trial of treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 1073-1086.
Pelham, W. E. (1999). President's message: The NIMH multimodal treatment study for ADHD: Just say yes to drugs? Clinical Child Psychology Newsletter, 14, 1-10.
Pelham, W. E., Gnagy, E. M., Greiner, A. R., et al. (2000). Behavioral versus behavioral and pharmacological treatment in ADHD attending a summer treatment program. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 507-525.
Pelham, W. E., Wheeler, T., & Chronis, A. (1998). Empirically supported psychosocial treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 190-205.
Reiss, D., & Neiderhiser, J. M. (2000). Interplay of genetic influences and social processes in developmental theory: Specific mechanisms are coming into view. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 357-374.
Sergeant, J. A., Oosterlaan, J., & van der Meere, J. (1999). Information processing and energetic factors in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In H. Quay & A. Hogan (Eds.), Handbook of disruptive behavior disorders. New York: Plenum.
Speer, C. D., & Greenbaum, P. E. (1995). Five methods of computing significant individual client change and improvement rates: Support for an individual growth curve approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 1044-1048.
Swanson, J. M., Hanley, T., Simpson, S., Davies, M., Schulte, A., Wells, K., et al. (2000). Evaluation of learning disorders in children with a psychiatric disorder: An example from the Multimodal Treatment Study for ADHD (MTA Study). In L. L. Greenhill (Ed.), Learning disabilities: Implications for psychiatric treatment (Vol. 19, pp. 97-125). American Psychiatry Association, Washington, DC.
Swanson, J. M., Kraemer, H. C., Hinshaw, S. P., et al. (2001). Clinical relevance of the primary findings of the MTA: Success rates based on severity of symptoms of ADHD and ODD symptoms at the end of treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 168-179.
Tanksley, S. D. (1993). Mapping polygenes. Annual Review of Genetics, 27, 205-233.
Tannock, R. (2000). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Advances in cognitive, neurobiological, and genetic research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 65-99.
Wells, K. C., Epstein, J. N., Hinshaw, S. P., et al. (2000). Parenting and family stress treatment outcomes in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): An empirical analysis in the MTA study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 543-553.
Wells, K. C., Pelham, W. E., Kotkin, R. A., et al. (2000). Psychosocial treatment strategies in the MTA study: Rationale, methods, and critical issues in design and implementation. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 483-505.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Swanson, J.M., Arnold, L.E., Vitiello, B. et al. Response to Commentary on the Multimodal Treatment Study of ADHD (MTA): Mining the Meaning of the MTA. J Abnorm Child Psychol 30, 327–332 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015709706388
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015709706388