Skip to main content
Log in

Fire Test Comparisons of Smoke Detector Response Times

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As part of an effort to develop objective smoke detector selection criteria, smoldering smoke and flammable liquid fire tests were performed on photoelectric, multicriteria (ion/heat/photo), and laser-photoelectric smoke detectors. Results showed that, when evaluated at similar sensitivities, the laser-photoelectric and multicriteria detectors had response times close to those of the photoelectric detector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bukowski, R. W. and Reneke, P. A., “New Approaches to the Interpretation of Signals from Fire Sensors,” Proceedings AUBE 99, the 11th International Conference on Automatic Fire Detection, Duisburg, Germany, March 16–18, 1999, pp. 11-21.

  2. Bernstein, D. S., “The End of False Alarms?” NFPA Journal, Vol. 92,No. 1 (Jan/Feb 1998), pp. 47-49.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pfister, G., “Multisensor/Multicriteria Fire Detection: A New Trend Rapidly Becomes State of the Art”, Fire Technology, Vol. 33,No. 2 (1997), pp. 115-139.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Milke, J., “Using Multiple Sensors for Discriminating Fire Detection,” Proceedings Fire Suppression and Detection Research Application Symposium, February 24–26, 1999, The Fire Protection Research Foundation, pp. 150-162 (1999).

  5. Gottuk, D. T., Peatross, M. J., Roby, R. J., and Beyler, C. L., “Advanced Fire Detection Using Multi-Signature Alarm Algorithms,” Proceedings AUBE 99, 1999, pp. 237-246.

  6. Qualey, J and Seyouri, R., “Development of a Multisensing Detector,” Proceedings of the Fire Suppression and Detection Research Application Symposium, February 25–27, 1998, NFPA, Quincy, Mass., 1998, pp. 86-97.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, L, Zhu, C., and Wang, J., “A New Type of Intelligent Point Photoelectric Smoke-Heat Combined Fire Detector,” Proceedings AUBE 99, 1999, pp. 262-271.

  8. Conforti, F., “Multi-Sensor, Multi-Criteria Detectors Are Better,” Proceedings AUBE 99, 1999, pp. 247-249.

  9. Anderson, D. D., “Laser Spot Detector Technology for Early Warning of Smoke,” Proceedings AUBE 99, 1999, pp. 447-457.

  10. Cleary, T, Grosshandler, W, and Chernovsky, A, “Smoke Detector Response to Nuisance Alarms,” Proceedings AUBE 99, 1999, pp. 32-41.

  11. UL268, Standard for Smoke Detectors for Fire Protective Signaling Systems, 4th Ed., 12/30/96, (Rev. 1/4/99), Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., Northbrook, III., 1999.

  12. Cleary, T., Chernovsky, A., Grosshandler, W., and Anderson, M., “Particulate Entry Lag in Spot-Type Smoke Detectors,” Sixth International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, Univ. of Poitiers, France, July 5–9, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heskestad, G., “Generalized Characterization of Smoke Entry and Response for Products of Combustion Detectors,” Proceedings of the Fire Detection for Life Safety Symposium, March 31–April 1, 1957, pp. 93-127.

  14. Marrion, C. E., Lag Time Modeling and the Effects of Ceiling Jet Velocity on the Placement of Optical Smoke Detectors, M.S. thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Mass., December 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qualey, J.R. Fire Test Comparisons of Smoke Detector Response Times. Fire Technology 36, 89–108 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015498224060

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015498224060

Keywords

Navigation